Originally posted by: mdahc
Okay, so you'd be willing to buy a 64-bit notebook without any guarantee that its manufacture will provide 3D drivers? Yes. Most people don't buy notebooks for 64-bit operating systems & 3D performance. Those who do have different priorities, which is fine. Hell, the much used Gateway/Emachines Mobile A64 notebooks have been out for how long now? Has Arima, Gateway, Emachines, or ATI produced drivers? NOOOOOOO! Look at the upcoming Ferrari 4000. It's going to ship with XP 32-bit home edition, and as far as I know there are no 64-bit drivers for the Radeon Xpress 200M chipset or the X700. ATI sure as hell isn't going to produce them, so do you think Acer/Arima will? Hardware and software companies are more interested in selling you more sh*t down the road than they are with compatibility. And as far as modded drivers are concerned, if you f*ck something up and your GPU isn't programmed properly, then you're SOL. First of all, calm down a little. There's no need for language. Second, as I said previously, MOST PEOPLE don't care about a 64-bit operating system. Right now there is limited 64-bit driver support for desktop systems even. That doesn't mean if you buy a 64-bit capable laptop that you won't be able to use it in WinXP 64. Right now you can barely run a desktop in WinXP 64, does that mean you shouldn't buy a 64-bit compatible desktop for that reason? Oh, and as far as modded drivers are concerned: no. You really don't know what you are talking about regarding GPU's, I'm sorry to say. Drivers have ZERO to do with "GPU programming" and the extent of being "SOL" is limited to having to reinstall Windows.
As far as Longhorn is concerned, you might be able to run it on some current notebook architecture, but it will be like running XP on Windows 98 architecture. Who doesn't want to be able to run all the extras? Furthermore, the fact that you can't really upgrade notebook GPU's despite the whole PCIe/MXM/Axiom buzz (w/o voiding your warranty) will limit you more than anything since Aero Glass's performance is supposed to scale with hardware. Lastly, who here likes to run their OS according to MS's recommendations? The recommended amount of RAM for XP 32-bit is 256MB. Anyone here running 256MB on XP and loving it? Nobody is disagreeing with you here. Everyone knows laptops have a much shorter lifespan than desktops, for the sole reason of upgradeability. Your analogy is fairly accurate: Longhorn will work, but it might be somewhat limited. From what I have read of the specifications, Longhorn will be functionally complete and performance more than satisfactory, but you won't have the pretty eye candy the new hardware accelerated interface is supposed to provide. Longhorn is in all reality not a reason to wait to buy a laptop. Say one waits until Longhorn is standard on laptops, woohoo! Oh wait, now there's another post-Longhorn OS on the horizon. Are you going to wait for that come out too? With computers you have to live with the very likely situation that when you buy something, something better will be available at the same or lower price within a short period of time. Deal with it.