• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Lakeside home for sale

Texashiker

Texashiker

Lifer
I saw this article a couple of weeks ago, and have been debating on whether or not to start a thread on it.

So here goes.

Joseph Goebbels’ lakeside love nest goes on sale after being left to rot for more than two decades

Berlin city government to sell Nazi propaganda minister's country home
Hitler gave the estate to Goebbels as a gift just as WWII started
Click to expand...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ar-Berlin-goes-sale-left-rot-two-decades.html

For liberals this may be a none issue. After all, slaughtering jews was legal at the time. Morals and values aside, as long as it was legal, right? But for civilized people, who you want to own a home with such a "rich" history?

Such a place would probably be best preserved as a museum, or national monument, or maybe bulldoze the house and make a part out of the land? But a home to have children in?

At a good price would you consider buying this lakeside home?

I could see some of the liberal members of the forum who like to hide behind the shield of law buying the house. What Goebbels did was legal. So there should be no issue.

I just could not imagine my kids or grandkids being in a house that harbored so much hate. When hate becomes law, what are people supposed to do?



Placed in P&N because of the political overtone and political history.
 
Last edited:
Texashiker said:
For liberals this may be a none issue. After all, slaughtering jews was legal at the time. Morals and values aside, as long as it was legal, right? But for civilized people, who you want to own a home with such a "rich" history?
Click to expand...

WTF is wrong with you?

piyathltt
 
Texashiker said:
<snip>

For liberals this may be a none issue. After all, slaughtering jews was legal at the time. Morals and values aside, as long as it was legal, right?
<snip>

Placed in P&N because of the political overtone and political history.
Click to expand...

Why the attempt to troll? :\

You placed this in P&N for that purpose only. :thumbsdown:
 
brycejones said:
WTF is wrong with you?

piyathltt
Click to expand...

There is nothing wrong with me. In times of doubt I use my moral compass.

To liberals, as long as it is legal anything goes.



cabri said:
Why the attempt to troll? :\

You placed this in P&N for that purpose only. :thumbsdown:
Click to expand...

No trolling. This is a serious question.

There are people out there who will hide their depravity behind the shield of law.
 
brycejones said:
WTF is wrong with you?

piyathltt
Click to expand...

You do realize that is exactly what liberal believe right?

Palestinians wage a war of aggression and get their ass kicked and Israel takes their land. OMG illegal occupiers because of UN!!!!!!

Japan wages a war of agression and gets their ass kicked and US takes Formosa. Haha, totally legal since the UN was founded months later :awe:
 
Texashiker said:
There is nothing wrong with me. In times of doubt I use my moral compass.

To liberals, as long as it is legal anything goes.





No trolling. This is a serious question.
Click to expand...

I think you have you have your political compass backwards. This sounds more like the libertarian position rather than liberal. Far right does not equal far left.
 
Here's a simple question I'm sure you are going to not want to answer without bringing up something else. So here's my challenge to you, answer the following question without bringing up any other topics:

How many liberals support the death penalty because it's legal?
 
thraashman said:
Your moral compass appears to be stuck pointing towards asshole. I'm not sure if it's polar asshole or magnetic asshole.
Click to expand...

Whether it was slavery, the holocaust, abortion,,,, whatever, as long as it is legal everything is fine, right?

There are those who will defend their depravity to their last breath.

Would you buy the home? Sure it needs some fixing up. Maybe turn Goebbels office into a nursery?


MixMasterTang said:
How many liberals support the death penalty because it's legal?
Click to expand...

Liberals do not care about due process.
 
MixMasterTang said:
Here's a simple question I'm sure you are going to not want to answer without bringing up something else. So here's my challenge to you, answer the following question without bringing up any other topics:

How many liberals support the death penalty because it's legal?
Click to expand...

So what you are saying is that liberals are hypocrites? 😀
 
Texashiker said:
Whether it was slavery, the holocaust, abortion,,,, whatever, as long as it is legal everything is fine, right?

There are those who will defend their depravity to their last breath.

Would you buy the home? Sure it needs some fixing up. Maybe turn Goebbels office into a nursery?
Click to expand...

Your arguments just get dumber and dumber every time. And you have this love of Godwinning up and down every topic because you don't have even the slightest hint of an intelligent or viable argument. You're trying to make this claim that "liberals would support blah blah because it's legal blah blah". But liberals support a woman's right to choose to have an abortion because it's the morally right thing to do. Conservatives committed the holocaust and supported slavery and both used the Bible to justify those acts. I do find it a bit amusing that you try to use the most horrific acts of conservatives in the last couple hundred years and equate them to your misunderstanding of the liberal side of an issue. Like, it's hard to even correct you because you're all over the map of idiocy, I don't even know where to start.

Let's make it simple, the best rule of thumb in P&N is if nehalem supports it, there's a 99.8% chance the morally correct way is the opposite.
 
thraashman said:
Your arguments just get dumber and dumber every time. And you have this love of Godwinning up and down every topic because you don't have even the slightest hint of an intelligent or viable argument. You're trying to make this claim that "liberals would support blah blah because it's legal blah blah". But liberals support a woman's right to choose to have an abortion because it's the morally right thing to do. Conservatives committed the holocaust and supported slavery and both used the Bible to justify those acts. I do find it a bit amusing that you try to use the most horrific acts of conservatives in the last couple hundred years and equate them to your misunderstanding of the liberal side of an issue. Like, it's hard to even correct you because you're all over the map of idiocy, I don't even know where to start.

Let's make it simple, the best rule of thumb in P&N is if nehalem supports it, there's a 99.8% chance the morally correct way is the opposite.
Click to expand...

Wrong
polar_house_means.jpg


Note how it was Republicans who freed the slaves while Democrats seceded in order to keep their slaves.

Further note it was Democrats who enacted Jim Crow.
 
thraashman said:
Your arguments just get dumber and dumber every time. And you have this love of Godwinning up and down every topic because you don't have even the slightest hint of an intelligent or viable argument. You're trying to make this claim that "liberals would support blah blah because it's legal blah blah". But liberals support a woman's right to choose to have an abortion because it's the morally right thing to do. Conservatives committed the holocaust and supported slavery and both used the Bible to justify those acts. I do find it a bit amusing that you try to use the most horrific acts of conservatives in the last couple hundred years and equate them to your misunderstanding of the liberal side of an issue. Like, it's hard to even correct you because you're all over the map of idiocy, I don't even know where to start.

Let's make it simple, the best rule of thumb in P&N is if nehalem supports it, there's a 99.8% chance the morally correct way is the opposite.
Click to expand...

Spot on. Spot fucking on.
 
nehalem256 said:
Wrong
polar_house_means.jpg


Note how it was Republicans who freed the slaves while Democrats seceded in order to keep their slaves.

Further note it was Democrats who enacted Jim Crow.
Click to expand...

Um Beavis....... that was back when Republicans were progressives. They left progressive ideals behind years ago.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top