Lakers vs. Wolves Game 3

[manly]

Originally posted by: Wolverine27
3 on 2 and Martin pulls up for a 3!?! Horrible shot selection. That cost 'em any chance of coming back.

T-Wolves would have had a chance if Martin drained those shots down the stretch. With the game clock running down, any open shot is a good shot. Besides Sprewell, they didn't have any crunch-time offensive spark and still managed to challenge the Lakers down the stretch.

 

[Stark]

Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Kings in 2005!!!!

i think the maloofs should trade webber, christie and bobby jackson for tmac.

brad miller is good power forward and peja went to crap when webber came back. he was eurobird when he was the focus of the offense.

hopefully it won't happen and the lakers will win back to back next year.

 

[Nitemare]

Originally posted by: manly

Originally posted by: Wolverine27
3 on 2 and Martin pulls up for a 3!?! Horrible shot selection. That cost 'em any chance of coming back.

T-Wolves would have had a chance if Martin drained those shots down the stretch. With the game clock running down, any open shot is a good shot. Besides Sprewell, they didn't have any crunch-time offensive spark and still managed to challenge the Lakers down the stretch.

He was probably still shaken by that Karl Malone flagrant foul...incidentally the Lakers won by 11, Karl Malone scored 11. Guess the NBA commissioners plan to keep the Lakers in the final and totally ignoring Malone's cheap shots is still on target.

 

[masterxfob]

Originally posted by: Stojakapimp
How can you possibly be a fan of the Lakers?

Have they done anything besides shoot free throws in the 4th quarter? This is just ridiculous. So boring to watch

you are one of the biggest lakers haters out there, bar none; and a kings fanboy to boot.

 

[kermalou]

Originally posted by: Nitemare

Originally posted by: manly

Originally posted by: Wolverine27
3 on 2 and Martin pulls up for a 3!?! Horrible shot selection. That cost 'em any chance of coming back.

T-Wolves would have had a chance if Martin drained those shots down the stretch. With the game clock running down, any open shot is a good shot. Besides Sprewell, they didn't have any crunch-time offensive spark and still managed to challenge the Lakers down the stretch.

He was probably still shaken by that Karl Malone flagrant foul...incidentally the Lakers won by 11, Karl Malone scored 11. Guess the NBA commissioners plan to keep the Lakers in the final and totally ignoring Malone's cheap shots is still on target.

you people all suck, all bow down to the great and mighty Lakers.......

there is a saying, if you can't beat em join em (that is what karl malonw and gary payton did) and you should to.

 

[masterxfob]

Originally posted by: Nitemare

Originally posted by: manly

Originally posted by: Wolverine27
3 on 2 and Martin pulls up for a 3!?! Horrible shot selection. That cost 'em any chance of coming back.

T-Wolves would have had a chance if Martin drained those shots down the stretch. With the game clock running down, any open shot is a good shot. Besides Sprewell, they didn't have any crunch-time offensive spark and still managed to challenge the Lakers down the stretch.

He was probably still shaken by that Karl Malone flagrant foul...incidentally the Lakers won by 11, Karl Malone scored 11. Guess the NBA commissioners plan to keep the Lakers in the final and totally ignoring Malone's cheap shots is still on target.

i won't argue that the lakers winning it all is good for business, but i feel malone's punishment was just. if malone was suspended, then sprewell should have as well for the hit he put on derek fisher. derek fisher was knocked down just as hard, if not harder, and yet they called a blocking foul on him. also, when several of the wolves players were asked about malone's flagrant, they said that they didn't think it was a nasty hit.

 

[Ranger X]

Originally posted by: masterxfob

Originally posted by: Stojakapimp
How can you possibly be a fan of the Lakers?

Have they done anything besides shoot free throws in the 4th quarter? This is just ridiculous. So boring to watch

you are one of the biggest lakers haters out there, bar none; and a kings fanboy to boot.

That's a gimme. Just by the name, we can conclude that he's a Kings fanboy. Since he's a Kings fanboy, he's a Laker hater.

The Kings should trade Webber. I like the idea of getting T-Mac (what someone said earlier).
C- Divac, PF - Miller, SF - Peja, SG - T-Mac, G - Bibby ... nice a bad starting 5.

 

[pyonir]

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/playoffs2004/columns/story?columnist=aldridge_david&id=1808516

 

[masterxfob]

Originally posted by: Ranger X

Originally posted by: masterxfob

Originally posted by: Stojakapimp
How can you possibly be a fan of the Lakers?

Have they done anything besides shoot free throws in the 4th quarter? This is just ridiculous. So boring to watch

you are one of the biggest lakers haters out there, bar none; and a kings fanboy to boot.

That's a gimme. Just by the name, we can conclude that he's a Kings fanboy. Since he's a Kings fanboy, he's a Laker hater.

The Kings should trade Webber. I like the idea of getting T-Mac (what someone said earlier).
C- Divac, PF - Miller, SF - Peja, SG - T-Mac, G - Bibby ... nice a bad starting 5.

it would be nice, except for vlade in the middle. there's no way at his age, that he can compete for 40 minutes a game. he's best used as a backup playing maybe 25-30 minutes a game. also, t-mac is a slight risk with his back problems.

edit: that songaila kid might not be a bad choice to split minutes with vlade though, he looked good in a couple of games against the wolves. he just needs to spend some time in the weight room.

 

[Nitemare]

Originally posted by: masterxfob

Originally posted by: Nitemare

Originally posted by: manly

Originally posted by: Wolverine27
3 on 2 and Martin pulls up for a 3!?! Horrible shot selection. That cost 'em any chance of coming back.

T-Wolves would have had a chance if Martin drained those shots down the stretch. With the game clock running down, any open shot is a good shot. Besides Sprewell, they didn't have any crunch-time offensive spark and still managed to challenge the Lakers down the stretch.

He was probably still shaken by that Karl Malone flagrant foul...incidentally the Lakers won by 11, Karl Malone scored 11. Guess the NBA commissioners plan to keep the Lakers in the final and totally ignoring Malone's cheap shots is still on target.

i won't argue that the lakers winning it all is good for business, but i feel malone's punishment was just. if malone was suspended, then sprewell should have as well for the hit he put on derek fisher. derek fisher was knocked down just as hard, if not harder, and yet they called a blocking foul on him. also, when several of the wolves players were asked about malone's flagrant, they said that they didn't think it was a nasty hit.

Spree doesn't make a habit of taking players out....only coaches

 

[Ilmater]

GO LAKERS!!! I hate basketball, so the Lakers paying for an all-star team and winning everything every year is fine with me. The biggest reason I like the Lakers is because I love underdogs! Everyone in the bar last night was chearing for the Wolves, but not me!!! I'm not a conformistl