Kroger and the fallacy of zero sum economics

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Lanyap

Elite Member
Dec 23, 2000
8,106
2,157
136
That media attention is coming from Kroger telling the media that the hazard pay requirement is the reason for the closures, and not because Kroger is getting their ass kicked by their competition in a highly affluent market.


The two under performing stores were already scheduled to be closed. The hazard pay increase accelerated the closures. Yes, it’s an ass move and Kroger/QFC is trying to make a point about the hazard pay. Hopefully they will allow the affected employees to transfer to other Kroger/QFC stores.

QFC employees seem to be making a decent salary for grocery clerks according to indeed.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,217
14,900
136
The two under performing stores were already scheduled to be closed. The hazard pay increase accelerated the closures. Yes, it’s an ass move and Kroger/QFC is trying to make a point about the hazard pay. Hopefully they will allow the affected employees to transfer to other Kroger/QFC stores.

QFC employees seem to be making a decent salary for grocery clerks according to indeed.

Lol that’s not decent pay. Where the fuck did you get that idea from?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DAPUNISHER

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,415
14,305
136
The two under performing stores were already scheduled to be closed. The hazard pay increase accelerated the closures. Yes, it’s an ass move and Kroger/QFC is trying to make a point about the hazard pay. Hopefully they will allow the affected employees to transfer to other Kroger/QFC stores.

QFC employees seem to be making a decent salary for grocery clerks according to indeed.
One of the points I'm trying to make here is that the reason Kroger is making the "ass move" of blaming the closures of these "underperforming" stores on the hazard pay is because their competitors' stores in the same markets aren't underperforming, with or without the hazard pay.
 

NWRMidnight

Platinum Member
Jun 18, 2001
2,930
2,558
136
The two under performing stores were already scheduled to be closed. The hazard pay increase accelerated the closures. Yes, it’s an ass move and Kroger/QFC is trying to make a point about the hazard pay. Hopefully they will allow the affected employees to transfer to other Kroger/QFC stores.

QFC employees seem to be making a decent salary for grocery clerks according to indeed.
That's not accurate for Seattle, with Washington's Minimum wage at $13.69 an hour? ($13.50 last year). An a Associate manager is only making $17 an hour.. that's shit wages for management.
 

Lanyap

Elite Member
Dec 23, 2000
8,106
2,157
136
Lol that’s not decent pay. Where the fuck did you get that idea from?



I’m not familiar with the cost of living in that area. What would you consider a decent wage for someone who stocks the shelves and checks you out in a grocery store in that area?
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,415
14,305
136
I’m not familiar with the cost of living in that area. What would you consider a decent wage for someone who stocks the shelves and checks you out in a grocery store in that area?
The cost of living in that area is very high. But if the wage increases aren't the cause of the closures, as we've determined, then why continue to talk about it?
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
26,066
23,934
136
I’m not familiar with the cost of living in that area. What would you consider a decent wage for someone who stocks the shelves and checks you out in a grocery store in that area?
A living wage perhaps? And if we're asking some of the lowest paid people in our society to make themselves more vulnerable to a potentially deadly disease while their company makes record profits and uses that money to juice the stock price to benefit shareholders maybe we should do something about that.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,562
29,163
146
They will close it because of ridiculous bureaucratic requirements that you attempt to jam down their throat as a means of demanding unskilled labor is worth x - even though it isn't actually worth that. You simply can't demand wage worth, the world of economics doesn't work that way sugar ;)

to this day it amazes me that you seem to consider yourself a skilled worker.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meghan54

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
28,433
20,423
146
A living wage perhaps? And if we're asking some of the lowest paid people in our society to make themselves more vulnerable to a potentially deadly disease while their company makes record profits and uses that money to juice the stock price to benefit shareholders maybe we should do something about that.
Well said Bryce.

The fuck is wrong with some of you? FYI: it is a rhetorical question, you dimwits. It has been observed, I think correctly, that it comes down to a lack of empathy. You are a bunch of callous sociopaths. I suspect your ancestors were the cock suckers whipping the slaves at the salt mines.

You rail against "freeloaders on society getting handouts" but somehow when they work their asses off, you still do not support their having the right to a fair standard of living. So, you want them all to work, but not be able to enjoy any of the fruits of their hard labor. Because you have decided on an arbitrary set of rules for what qualifies as worthy of a living wage.

Billy Mays enters the chat: But wait, there's more! Even if they do get a degree, you will now further stratify the living wage standard. Now that they have learned a skill, you will say sorry, you chose the wrong one. If we pursue this line of thinking to its conclusion, then everyone gets "the right degrees". Do these fields have the capability of employing everyone? Of course the don't, which is why it is simply an excuse to be wantonly cruel to others. And that is completely disregarding the myriad of difficulties involved in obtaining that higher education in the U.S. for most of its citizens. And of course while they pursue that degree, most are forced to work those unskilled jobs, and you won't support paying them enough to meet all their needs. So now they end up saddled with huge debts with interest, and being for all practical purposes indentured servants for decades of their lives.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
23,410
10,301
136
Kroger has always been a 2nd class store to begin with. My Dad would shop at 2 different grocery stores (Giant and Safeway), he didn't trust my mom to use coupons. He never, ever shopped at Kroger. And I have never lived in an area since that I had to shop at one. Unfortunately, I just googled to see what other chains that they own. Ralph's and Lucky's those were down in SoCal, I think Food 4 Less also. I walked into a Food 4 Less once in Anaheim close to Disneyland and walked out. Fred Meyers stores probably have the best microbrew section of any of the store chains up here in the Northwest, they aren't a bad store though.
Of course with this meandering post, I forgot the original offender QFC, is actually a little better than the Safeway in Belfair, WA. I currently do the bulk of my shopping at Winco. Which has it's pluses and minuses. First plus, prices (employee owned), meats can be very resaonable also. Selection sucks, and the aisles are kind of narrow.
 
Last edited:

Gardener

Senior member
Nov 22, 1999
758
540
136
Fuck QFC/Kroger. No one wanted that store in Wedgwood, it is a small location and for 20 years that location was occupied by a locally owned Matthew's Red Apple market. QFC outbid them, and took the lease. That store was already slated for closure, they just timed the announcement to make it appear to coincide with the hazard pay resolution.

@Lanyap

Seattle's minimum wage is $16.39, it covers grocery store workers.