• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

korean karate holy shiz!

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
And I partially agree with your comment that in simplest terms says "it is not the size of the dog in the fight, it is the size of the fight in the dog. But it has very real limits. The Gracie challenges that were filmed back in the 80's resulted in very good fighters, chinese martial artists among them, getting raped. You have to have a ground fighting game or a ground fighter will dominate you. Even when there is a substantial physical disparity.

yeah. though in a street fight how smart is useing BJJ? if 1 on 1 sure. even then..

Even the Gracie's were shown to be outdated. mastering 1 straight craft is nto the best. you can and will lose.

The best martial arts i have seen cross train. Many styles are changing from a strict traditional art to more flowing cross training type. My son was in a Karate class that was strict traditional (but a mcdojo). it was not doing him any good.

At my daughter gymnastics academy there is a TWD place. They have a few different class's. 1 for sport TWD (they do well too), one he call's "self defense TWD" witch has traditional TWD AND a ton of stuff from other arts from wrestling, judo and jj. sparing is mandatory and again its a wide range of stuff they learn.

They also teach kickboxing, a "MMA" class (haven't got to see wtf they do in that) and weapons class (looks like a dance with weapons).
 
If you were taught to be tight in the shoulders in Shotokan, or just not taught not to be, your senseis failed you terribly.

I was a bit surprised at that as well. I was not aware of any Shotokan factions that adopted the shoulder up style, since it doesn't work well at all for that kind of competition.
 
yeah. though in a street fight how smart is useing BJJ? if 1 on 1 sure. even then..
I have training partners that have used it, quite successfully too. But, you have to keep in mind that BJJ and GJJ are not always the same. I have trained with BJJ teams that train specifically for comps like IBBJF, Grappler's Quest, NAGA, etc.

But in the BJJ for MMA classes, and GracieJJ, dealing with strikes is integral to the training. And Draculino has some nice vids for showing how ineffective trying to bite a good BJJer is. The BJJ is not good for the streets mantra is being spread by haters. The common jokes about "the streets" include the ground as lava, being utterly riddled with razor sharp shards of broken glass, and always unseen attackers just waiting for an opportunity to soccer kick you.

The fact is that the Gracies and others fought in the streets of Brazil and wrecked cats lacking a strong ground game. GJJ has a strong self defense syllabus too. And throws and takedowns are trained many places. One of my favorite things about Dave Camarillo's Guerilla Jiu Jitsu is how he stresses the impact control position from throws and takedowns. You don't just put the guy down, you do it with an emphasis on being in superior position, often setup to finish the fight against someone with little or no sub defense - good judo. Presuming the throw did not finish them. Since lack of good ukemi means hitting very badly far more often than not.

Jumping or pulling guard in the street is a more dubious a proposition. But, you should be able to get it to the ground if you want it there, without having to resort to it anyways. Unfortunately, I do read a lot of BJJers have a weak takedown games and jump guard early and often in matches. Mostly because they don't lose points that way in most comps. That sportified mentallity is definitely not the best street strategy.

My point is that there ARE BJJ and GJJ places that teach atemi waza (striking techniques) and how to defend against them. Locally most bJJ is in MMA gyms, and other classes like boxing, kickboxing, MT, or MMA are right before or right after. So, getting a well rounded skill set is as easy as taking more than one class.

And, there are submissions performed standing too. Making it possible to use BJJ or GJJ without being horizontal.

Even the Gracie's were shown to be outdated. mastering 1 straight craft is not the best. you can and will lose.
That is not really a fair statement though. Yes, Gracies have been beat by better fighters, but not because they lacked some essential skill set necessary to succeed. They lose to better fighters. Roger is still a work in progress, but has beaten other professional fighters under MMA rules. And it is not equitable to talk about self defense application, but then reference results between professional combat athletes.
 
Last edited:
I don't think TKD's one of the most effective martial arts around, either, but we shouldn't be denigrating kicks as a whole. Kicks can be quite effective in many situations.

TKD is like boxing...good for in the ring with the rules you have to follow.

Most kicks would send you flying.
 
I would not want to take a fight to the ground in about 90% of the situations I have been in.

You are setting yourself up to get stomped on by any of the dude's friends. I get in and get the f out of dodge.
 
In my experience, the high kicks of taekwondo tend to lack power and even the slightest block will deflect if not unstablize the kicker. Several of those kicks I've taken to the head without significant pain or distraction, ESP the round house kick, if it doesn't hit the jaw it will do nothing to the parietal skull. It counts for points but not in damage.
 
In my experience, the high kicks of taekwondo tend to lack power and even the slightest block will deflect if not unstablize the kicker. Several of those kicks I've taken to the head without significant pain or distraction, ESP the round house kick, if it doesn't hit the jaw it will do nothing to the parietal skull. It counts for points but not in damage.

You're probably referring to their round kick, not their less-used roundhouse. Pretty different strikes in terms of form, purpose, and power.

Round kick:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIawbHsotgI

Roundhouse:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSzvkAydKuM
 
You're probably referring to their round kick, not their less-used roundhouse. Pretty different strikes in terms of form, purpose, and power.

Round kick:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIawbHsotgI

Roundhouse:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSzvkAydKuM

No the higher full roundhouse was very popular amongs the TKD trained fighters in our dojo. If you watch the second video he demonstrates a high roundhouse. The main difference is the angle of impact. The round kick would come up at about a 45 degree angle while the roundhouse is closer to horizontal or even with a slight downward declination.
I don't know if its just me, but the bodily rotation of the roundhouse alway urged me to step into the kick and block counterattack. Often with a slight rotation of the sideblock toward upward block, about 45 deg, the block would lift the kicker off his planted foot, and reverse the rotation. Several times this was enough to take them down onto the knee with enough force to end Kumate. Unfortunately it did result in one fractured patella at our dojo, (hard multipurpose room floor, it was the 80's and dedicated dojo's were rare)
We were teaching Isshinryu so, we had to start discouraging kicks to the head, mostly for safety, but from a point of style and function, sensai felt that the high kicks lacked enough power to warrant the risk. We were full contact, and unless the blow seemed to have impact it was not scored. No little taps for points with sensai Matsko.
 
The main problem I have found with many martial arts is the students only know 'point sparring' and thus never really develop their striking strength.

High kick or not will have a tremendous amount of power. They jumping / leaping kicks are the ones that are usually lesser in power, but done to prepare/feint into a much more powerful blow.

Also too many try to punch from too far away and/or kick while to close. IMHO kicks are your long range, punches mid and knees and elbows up close and personal. The latter two almost always forbidden in point sparring and in many full-contact arenas.
 
knees and elbows up close and personal. The latter two almost always forbidden in point sparring and in many full-contact arenas.
Yep. Which is why they need to be spammed during pad, bag, and partner drills. You cannot throw them when sparring, and expect to make a steady diet of it. They are too injurious, and the motto is 'Train today, so you can train tomorrow."
 
Yep. Which is why they need to be spammed during pad, bag, and partner drills. You cannot throw them when sparring, and expect to make a steady diet of it. They are too injurious, and the motto is 'Train today, so you can train tomorrow."

Exactly. Unfortunately too many schools just give the students what they want vs need.

Sometimes you are limited to insurance / charter / etc...I'd recommend extra-cirricular is that is the case. Many instructors will facilitate this 'after-hours'.
 
Exactly. Unfortunately too many schools just give the students what they want vs need.

Sometimes you are limited to insurance / charter / etc...I'd recommend extra-cirricular if that is the case. Many instructors will facilitate this 'after-hours'.
With a lot of places that don't train it, it is simply because the instructors were never trained that way. There are a metric shit ton of watered down dojos in the U.S. Then there are all the frauds and LARPers compounding the problem.

Hence why MMA gyms are on the rise; the training is much more complete than the vast majority of karate, TKD, kung fu, etc. places. I still don't like to dub most of them traditional martial arts because many forms of wrestling, boxing, and even Judo, are older than, for instance, Shotokan or TKD. Even the Chinese martial arts suffered horribly when the communists took over the country. Much the way karate did after WWII.

The WTF part of so few karateka outside of knockdown styles, having good knees and elbows, is that they are in the katas. But the understanding of the bunkai in dojos I have visited to train with, is very punch, kick, block centric. And they tend to clinch wrong, like grabbing the shoulders to knee. Or how they understand and use hikite.

Dead on about giving them what they want. They have to, to keep the doors open, if they are not a kiddy krotty kare.
 
No the higher full roundhouse was very popular amongs the TKD trained fighters in our dojo. If you watch the second video he demonstrates a high roundhouse. The main difference is the angle of impact. The round kick would come up at about a 45 degree angle while the roundhouse is closer to horizontal or even with a slight downward declination.
I don't know if its just me, but the bodily rotation of the roundhouse alway urged me to step into the kick and block counterattack. Often with a slight rotation of the sideblock toward upward block, about 45 deg, the block would lift the kicker off his planted foot, and reverse the rotation. Several times this was enough to take them down onto the knee with enough force to end Kumate. Unfortunately it did result in one fractured patella at our dojo, (hard multipurpose room floor, it was the 80's and dedicated dojo's were rare)
We were teaching Isshinryu so, we had to start discouraging kicks to the head, mostly for safety, but from a point of style and function, sensai felt that the high kicks lacked enough power to warrant the risk. We were full contact, and unless the blow seemed to have impact it was not scored. No little taps for points with sensai Matsko.

The basic mechanics behind the full roundhouse of the TKD, tae tud of Muay Thai, and jodan mawashi geri of knockdown styles of Karate aren't really that different. Even the area of impact for the head-level one isn't that different, with MT and KD aiming for using the low shin (but in practice often hitting with instep at that height), while TKD tending to use the instep. I doubt there's a more often used head-level kick in top level striking competition (ie. K1).

Some may argue the slight differences in base foot turning/placement, degree of hip rotation, angle of swing at the knee, body lean, etc, but when it gets down to the nuts and bolts, they're surprisingly similar. Given an equal training regiment and fighter skill, the difficulty blocking it would be virtually identical.
 
With a lot of places that don't train it, it is simply because the instructors were never trained that way. There are a metric shit ton of watered down dojos in the U.S. Then there are all the frauds and LARPers compounding the problem.

Hence why MMA gyms are on the rise; the training is much more complete than the vast majority of karate, TKD, kung fu, etc. places. I still don't like to dub most of them traditional martial arts because many forms of wrestling, boxing, and even Judo, are older than, for instance, Shotokan or TKD. Even the Chinese martial arts suffered horribly when the communists took over the country. Much the way karate did after WWII.

The WTF part of so few karateka outside of knockdown styles, having good knees and elbows, is that they are in the katas. But the understanding of the bunkai in dojos I have visited to train with, is very punch, kick, block centric. And they tend to clinch wrong, like grabbing the shoulders to knee. Or how they understand and use hikite.

Dead on about giving them what they want. They have to, to keep the doors open, if they are not a kiddy krotty kare.

yeap.

when looking for a place for my son we went to a few different ones. we were presently surprised to find one that was in the same gym as my daughters gymnastics (though she moved gyms so that sucks).

I was surprised to find while its a TWD place they don't just offer the traditional point sparing (witch alky is dead on with) TWD. they do a hybrid of a few different styles and wrestling with the TWD forms (he explained why he still did the forms but gotta admit i didn't catch it. i was dead tired).

My son loves to get down on the floor and wrestle/fight. though he has been in both martial arts and wrestling for years (and gymnastics but no place does that around here)


We pulled him from a Karate "McDojo". He was not learning shit and getting a belt every time the class ended (6 week class).


also this place reminds me more of the hapkido i took when younger. sure you learned the kickes (sucked at those. i was great on the ground though) but that was not all it was. The idea is if you are in a fight you are the one walking home. It's more self-defense geared then sport
 
yeap.

when looking for a place for my son we went to a few different ones. we were presently surprised to find one that was in the same gym as my daughters gymnastics (though she moved gyms so that sucks).

I was surprised to find while its a TWD place they don't just offer the traditional point sparing (witch alky is dead on with) TWD. they do a hybrid of a few different styles and wrestling with the TWD forms (he explained why he still did the forms but gotta admit i didn't catch it. i was dead tired).

My son loves to get down on the floor and wrestle/fight. though he has been in both martial arts and wrestling for years (and gymnastics but no place does that around here)


We pulled him from a Karate "McDojo". He was not learning shit and getting a belt every time the class ended (6 week class).


also this place reminds me more of the hapkido i took when younger. sure you learned the kickes (sucked at those. i was great on the ground though) but that was not all it was. The idea is if you are in a fight you are the one walking home. It's more self-defense geared then sport
Fortunately, you have trained enough to know what's what. Saves your kid from ending up with false confidence or worse, from getting handed a black belt in some worthless shat. Think of the parents that don't know better. Their own fault for not doing the research, I suppose. Still sucks that they drop little Johnny and Suzy off for karate and they would get better self defense skills at soccer practice. 😛
 
i love parent's that defend their 10 year old black belts.

yeah. I know 1 12 yr old black belt i would NOT mess with. the kid is damn good (just won a TWD national sparing competition). but the most i have seen are..questionable.


there are 2 "assistant" teachers at my kids place. one is 15 the other 17. both black belts (though they been in it 5 days a week for over 10 years.. that's fucking insane).


at the karate place my son went to? the black belt class was full of 9-11 yr olds and they couldn't do shit. i bet money my kid NOW at 6 would woop any of there ass's. sure they are bigger and stronger but i bet my kid knows how to throw a punch and kick better then they do.


edit: thinking about it. my daughter has maybe 5 months of TWD and i bet she is could kick any of there ass's and she is a tiny girl (strong though).
 
Last edited:
at the karate place my son went to? the black belt class was full of 9-11 yr olds and they couldn't do shit. i bet money my kid NOW at 6 would woop any of there ass's. sure they are bigger and stronger but i bet my kid knows how to throw a punch and kick better then they do.

That seems to happen a lot in many point style karate studios. I have yet to see that in even one single knockdown karate place though.
 
That seems to happen a lot in many point style karate studios. I have yet to see that in even one single knockdown karate place though.
My only criticism on most the KD styles, is that they don't punch to the head in comp. I understand it is a must because they don't glove up. And facial damage and horor movie levels of blood would result. But, given how often they get dropped with high kicks, they should go ahead and compromise. Wear the MMA 4oz, and start fighting like it really goes down in life. IE. people trying to punch you in the head.

Point karate has its positives too. But as a stand alone it is definitely FAIL. It is great for developing timing, distance, focus, ashi and tai sabaki (footwork and body movement) The best lesson it teaches, is that it is better to give than receive. Hit but not be hit. Where it fails hard, is that it encourages bad habits in so far as defending yourself goes. Quick strikes that lack authority, like the back fist (not spinning) and kick combos where a leg is constantly in the air popping around like an old rainbird sprinkler. And as bad as that is, what makes it worse, is the kicks have little juice in them. The stop and go fighting becomes habitual as well. I have sparred many tournament fighters that throw pot shots almost exclusively. And have no idea how to shell or respond when pressured with combos, in-fighting, and clinching. Hard to train that out of them. Sadly, that seems to be the Open tournament scene now. tip tap, stop&go, games of tag.

I did almost 7yrs on the Fl. tournament circuits '80-'87. FBBA (Fl. Black Belt Assc.) were some of my favorite tournaments. FAME started sucking hard fast, when it took over. Smaller ones could be wild and fun as hell. Many were full contact to the body, and even a head kick TKO/KO did not necessarily get you DQ''d. Sometimes you won by forfeit because they could not continue. If there was facial damage a penalty point was assured. If you drew blood, auto DQ. But even that depended on how highly rated the tournament was, and who held it. Brown belt was dog eat dog almost always. The judges knew that is the stage of training when you are looking to prove you deserve your shodan. In a good dojo, by those last few ranks as a mudansha, you have developed power striking, but still don't have many settings on your power dial yet. I had matches every bit as tough physically, as ammy kickboxing matches. Except the gloves were a lot lighter and open fingered, no wraps, and you could grab each others' gi.

Some tournaments were continuous rounds scored like boxing. Some were stop&go, but a good, clean, shot, was the only way to score. Everything else was a clash. And we would frequently trade for a good 5 seconds or more before they would break us. Mostly due to certain ashi barai (foot sweeps) a few throws below the hip and a 2 second window to hit them after they were down, might be sanctioned for the tournament. Also, 2 warnings for leaving the ring, and the penalty points kick in. Those rings were small too 15'x15' iirc for most, so you were going to mix it up.

The U.S. Open was always the most pussified IME. We would get more warnings for excessive contact and penalty points than every other event that year, put together.

Cliffs: Point fighting is not what it used to be. And, it is still a useful tool if part of a fighting system, and not the dominate core of it.

And, Machida and Wonder Boy are excellent examples of how the style can be incorporated into the stand up game successfully. Too bad Wonder Boy is a n00b on the mat compared to many MMA fighters.
 
Last edited:
My only criticism on most the KD styles, is that they don't punch to the head in comp. I understand it is a must because they don't glove up. And facial damage and horor movie levels of blood would result. But, given how often they get dropped with high kicks, they should go ahead and compromise. Wear the MMA 4oz, and start fighting like it really goes down in life. IE. people trying to punch you in the head.

Point karate has its positives too. But as a stand alone it is definitely FAIL. It is great for developing timing, distance, focus, ashi and tai sabaki (footwork and body movement) The best lesson it teaches, is that it is better to give than receive. Hit but not be hit. Where it fails hard, is that it encourages bad habits in so far as defending yourself goes. Quick strikes that lack authority, like the back fist (not spinning) and kick combos where a leg is constantly in the air popping around like an old rainbird sprinkler. And as bad as that is, what makes it worse, is the kicks have little juice in them. The stop and go fighting becomes habitual as well. I have sparred many tournament fighters that throw pot shots almost exclusively. And have no idea how to shell or respond when pressured with combos, in-fighting, and clinching. Hard to train that out of them. Sadly, that seems to be the Open tournament scene now. tip tap, stop&go, games of tag.

I did almost 7yrs on the Fl. tournament circuits '80-'87. FBBA (Fl. Black Belt Assc.) were some of my favorite tournaments. FAME started sucking hard fast, when it took over. Smaller ones could be wild and fun as hell. Many were full contact to the body, and even a head kick TKO/KO did not necessarily get you DQ''d. Sometimes you won by forfeit because they could not continue. If there was facial damage a penalty point was assured. If you drew blood, auto DQ. But even that depended on how highly rated the tournament was, and who held it. Brown belt was dog eat dog almost always. The judges knew that is the stage of training when you are looking to prove you deserve your shodan. In a good dojo, by those last few ranks as a mudansha, you have developed power striking, but still don't have many settings on your power dial yet. I had matches every bit as tough physically, as ammy kickboxing matches. Except the gloves were a lot lighter and open fingered, no wraps, and you could grab each others' gi.

Some tournaments were continuous rounds scored like boxing. Some were stop&go, but a good, clean, shot, was the only way to score. Everything else was a clash. And we would frequently trade for a good 5 seconds or more before they would break us. Mostly due to certain ashi barai (foot sweeps) a few throws below the hip and a 2 second window to hit them after they were down, might be sanctioned for the tournament. Also, 2 warnings for leaving the ring, and the penalty points kick in. Those rings were small too 15'x15' iirc for most, so you were going to mix it up.

The U.S. Open was always the most pussified IME. We would get more warnings for excessive contact and penalty points than every other event that year, put together.

Cliffs: Point fighting is not what it used to be. And, it is still a useful tool if part of a fighting system, and not the dominate core of it.

And, Machida and Wonder Boy are excellent examples of how the style can be incorporated into the stand up game successfully. Too bad Wonder Boy is a n00b on the mat compared to many MMA fighters.

Yeah, I agree with what you're saying.

Honestly, for better or worse, every style trains towards its competitions. As much as many KD styles do face punching and grabbing during class, ultimately, it'll remain secondary training because it's not integrated into most competitions.

I think what KD has done well though is training/testing is very tough and standards have remained high. I think this is one thing most BJJ schools have done well too, that the belts actually mean something.

Point karate definitely has its positives, no question (the training philosophy, perhaps a bit less the current style of tournament judging). In fact, for self defense applications, sometimes it's more applicable than continuous fighting styles. If you ask a bouncer, or someone in law enforcement, they'll often tell you the situations they get in most often involve multiple unskilled aggressors. In those cases, it's best to strike hard and fast, and get out of the way.

I enjoy watching Machida and Thompson. It's always interesting seeing the differences and how they integrate that into their game. Thompson definitely has a way to go, since he's so much more used to kickboxing than MMA, but I think he's great in his core competencies, he just needs to fill out the holes. Isn't that what MMA is about these days, training your deficiencies enough to avoid getting caught, fighting defensively, and winning on points? 😉
 
Back
Top