• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

koch brothers throwing their full support in for rubio

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
feralkid said:
What does that have to do with suggesting Democrats would go out and vote for Rubio or Cruz?
Click to expand...

Yes because.

a) Voting for Sanders is a wasted vote
b) Trump unfortunately is more electable than Rubio or Cruz. He is a populist and he polls well with moderate democrats. Republicans won't sit out this election and will have suck it up and vote for him when he gets the nomination


Hillary or Sanders I don't think could beat Trump. Cruz or Rubio they may.
 
CaptainGoodnight said:
Yes because.

a) Voting for Sanders is a wasted vote
b) Trump unfortunately is more electable than Rubio or Cruz. He is a populist and he polls well with moderate democrats. Republicans won't sit out this election and will have suck it up and vote for him when he gets the nomination


Hillary or Sanders I don't think could beat Trump. Cruz or Rubio they may.
Click to expand...


I get your logic; I just think it's erroneous that you expect Democrats to think like that.
 
CaptainGoodnight said:
I am being a realist. Sanders is not going to get the nomination.
Click to expand...

CaptainGoodnight said:
Yes because.

a) Voting for Sanders is a wasted vote
b) Trump unfortunately is more electable than Rubio or Cruz. He is a populist and he polls well with moderate democrats. Republicans won't sit out this election and will have suck it up and vote for him when he gets the nomination


Hillary or Sanders I don't think could beat Trump. Cruz or Rubio they may.
Click to expand...

There is a much better with Sanders at beating Trump. Clinton I am not so sure anymore. There is just too much from the well to choose regarding Clinton and Trump is good at getting people to see through the veneer. Look at how Bush imploded spectacularly, he did a great job showing and reminding voters what the Bush family really stands for.

I would love to see Trump nominated just to see the fireworks, Clinton will no longer be shielded and she will get exposed for what she really is, just like Jeb.
 
hal2kilo said:
Yea, except they pronounce it Coke.
Click to expand...

Igor: Dr. Frankenstein...
Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: "Fronkensteen."
Igor: You're putting me on.
Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: No, it's pronounced "Fronkensteen."
Igor: Do you also say "Froaderick"?
Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: No... "Frederick."
Igor: Well, why isn't it "Froaderick Fronkensteen"?
Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: It isn't; it's "Frederick Fronkensteen."
Igor: I see.
Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: You must be Igor.
[He pronounces it ee-gor]
Igor: No, it's pronounced "eye-gor."
Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: But they told me it was "ee-gor."
Igor: Well, they were wrong then, weren't they?


Some things just work that way I guess.


:colbert:
 
Looks like they might be willing to spend 400-900 million to get trump out, they already sent some operatives to work with the rubio campaign staff.

They are serious, its the manhattan project to get rid of Trump.

No one spends that much money and not expect a return. Sad that we have our democracy hijacked by a cabal of special interest who are gutting our democracy little by little.
 
sandorski said:
No. He simply was not in any sense a Socialist. Which would be why he sought to eradicate them.
Click to expand...

He sought to eliminate them because there was no room for them in his brand of socialism. He was very much a socialist and this is fact really can't be argued since we have record of how Hitler ran Germany. The only people saying otherwise are Democratic Socialists that are butthurt that socialism's name has been dragged through the mud. Many socialists today defend Hilter for that reason. Like see below.

https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/695638493855379457?ref_src=twsrc^tfw
 
CaptainGoodnight said:
He sought to eliminate them because there was no room for them in his brand of socialism. He was very much a socialist and this is fact really can't be argued since we have record of how Hitler ran Germany. The only people saying otherwise are Democratic Socialists that are butthurt that socialism's name has been dragged through the mud. Many socialists today defend Hilter for that reason. Like see below.

https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/695638493855379457?ref_src=twsrc^tfw
Click to expand...

Uhh, no.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top