Kiss your gfs and mothers goodbye.. Bill instituting draft introduced (and died)

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

XCLAN

Platinum Member
Mar 22, 2001
2,401
0
0
Originally posted by: kevin000
Originally posted by: Valinos
EDIT: To clear it up, since it sounds like I contradict myself. I don't necessarily think it is our deal to keep peace in the middle east, but at the same time I think a good ass-whipping is in order for Saddam. It is time to finish what we started.

werd
 

Mill

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
28,558
3
81
Originally posted by: Valinos
Originally posted by: Millenium
Originally posted by: Valinos
Originally posted by: Millenium
Originally posted by: Valinos
Originally posted by: Millenium
In WWII, Mainland America was not being directly attacked. How many of you would have rallied against us entering the war then? Sure you may say Pearl Harbor, and my response to that is 9/11(case for Afghanistan) and Saddam becoming increasingly unstable and paying money to terrorists. It would have been nice if we could have gotten Hitler before he became such a dastardly leader. Should we wait around for Saddam to do the same? He has already attacked Iran and Kuwait because he had expansionist ideals much like Stalin or Hitler.

Give me a break. I will fight when the war gets here. What a load of crap. By that time it will be too late.

I have to laugh every time someone compares Saddam to Hitler and Iraq to WW2 Germany. Gimme a frickin' break. Iraq simply does not have the technology or manpower to take over the middle east. Saddam hasn't, nor has the power, to kill millions of people like Hitler. The U.S. to Iraq is like China to Tibet.

WTF do you think WMD are for? That is your millions of people right there. Boy you people make me LMAO with some of your absurd rebuttals. No one thinks Saddam has a large and powerful army(it was a large army at one time). He has chemical and biological weapons and either has or is close to nuclear weapons.

What do you think the point of WMD are? To cuddle with at night?

You think Israel doesn't have the means to fight back? Iran? Saudi Arabia? If Iraq threatened Israel in particular, there'd be a lot of dead Iraqis. I don't think it is our deal, let them screw with each other. If the time comes that Iraq is a threat to our nation, then let's go blow them up. That'll never happen though, because his army is weak and his technology sucks. If Iraq started invading countries in the middle east, their neighbors would become extremely apprehensive and probably fight back. Iran and Israel in particular aren't on very good terms with Iraq.

Thing is, Saddam isn't Hitler. Iraq isn't Germany. At the mention of U.S. troops, Iraqi soldiers run in fear.

Don't get me wrong, I have no problem with an invasion of Iraq, but to compare him with Hitler is just outrageous.

EDIT: To clear it up, since it sounds like I contradict myself. I don't necessarily think it is our deal to keep peace in the middle east, but at the same time I think a good ass-whipping is in order for Saddam. It is time to finish what we started.


I agree Saddam needs to be removed from power, but Iraq is a threat to us right now. Your scenario of Saudi Arabia and Iran fighting along side Israel is impossible. Saddam has clear expansionist ideals and Saudi Arabia and Iran could not contain him. If Saddam were to attack Israel first and try to overrun them, other Arab countrys would be dying to help. Sorry, but Iran and Saudi Arabia will NOT hold Iraq in check. Your scenario is asking for a dangerous confrontation and WMD would be used.

I don't think Saudi Arabia and Iran would HELP Iraq annihilate Israel, because they would be threatened afterwards. Also, if you look at the statistics that Millenium gives, they show that Iran actually has a larger army and more artillery pieces than Iraq. I don't think Iraq would win any war with Iran without horrible casualties. Also, remember...Israel actually has nuclear capabilities. Iraq may, we don't know for sure, but they do have bio and chem weapons. I think Iraq would be hesitant to attack Israel, considering Israel has much better weaponry and nukes at their disposal...and they're not afraid to use 'em.



Iraq has attacked Israel in the past with Scud missiles. Iraq's arsenal is not limited to conventional means and neither is Iran. Iraq has more control over its citizenship and has more people to draft immediately than Iran could do with its current leadership. Trust me we do not need another Iraq-Iran war. Saudi Arabia would love to get rid of Israel and if you don't believe that you are delusional.
 

Aceman

Banned
Oct 9, 1999
3,159
0
0
Originally posted by: bthorny
Canada here i come :)

Don't let the border crossing gates hit you in the ass on the way out. And please, make sure you stay there.