is it going to be a 2D isometric like BG?
Yes, and here is a Enviroment screenshot:
Its gonna be a good looking game.
is it going to be a 2D isometric like BG?
Yes, and here is a Enviroment screenshot:
Its gonna be a good looking game.
I'm a little concerned about how many stretch goals they've achieved, since they now have to implement all this stuff. Also, I cannot believe that multiplayer support wasn't one of the goals, dammit.
True, but adding a second city sounds like a crap load of work. It's not just something you tack on at the last moment and still think you can hit the release date.
Then again they are all experienced so I'm sure they know what they are doing. I hope.
True, but adding a second city sounds like a crap load of work. It's not just something you tack on at the last moment and still think you can hit the release date.
Then again they are all experienced so I'm sure they know what they are doing. I hope.
I never really understood multiplayer in games like this, as exploring cities, talking to NPC's and making dialogue choices is a huge part of them, and those elements have no appeal in multiplayer, IMO. It seems like most people end up skipping the NPC dialogue and exploration and go straight to the combat, but then they are skipping some of the strongest elements of the games, so they might as well just be playing Diablo. So I think they are making the right choice to not spend man hours on multi.
True, but adding a second city sounds like a crap load of work. It's not just something you tack on at the last moment and still think you can hit the release date.
Then again they are all experienced so I'm sure they know what they are doing. I hope.
Kind of this. I just feel that some of the stretch goals are nice to haves but are potential delayers that might cause longer development time. I would rather have a good solid game with some variety next year (or the following) rather than 'Sky's the limit' game at some point in the far flung future. Provided i don't end up feeling chinced based on what is released, I am always willing to pony up more money for expansions/sequels.
They're a business. They've got this potential goldmine and they want to milk it for all its worth.
They're a business. They've got this potential goldmine and they want to milk it for all its worth.
I am not sure of the relevance here to my comment. Yes, they are a business. But they only make a profit if they actually release something. And if they release something good and solid in a reasonable time frame, they have the added incentive of actually selling expansions and sequels. If they instead offer the moon and the stars but never release it, confidence will eventually erode and they won't make anywhere near as much money. it only stands to reason.
Well no. Its kickstarter. It is not guaranteed to succeed. They could promise a product in a year, then delay for 3 years and still have the funds for the game. They've essentially received the money upfront to make the game and still produce a profit. Selling extra copies after the game releases is gravy.
My response to your post was to point out that yes, they could release a good game in a year without the stretch goals. However, they have a gold mine in front of their eyes, so they'll be stupid not to introduce stretch goals and keep the money flowing.
Well no. Its kickstarter. It is not guaranteed to succeed. They could promise a product in a year, then delay for 3 years and still have the funds for the game. They've essentially received the money upfront to make the game and still produce a profit. Selling extra copies after the game releases is gravy.
It looks like they will reach the last goal, although there is less than a day left to reach it.
