• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Kevin Smith to start filming Clerks 2 in January.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: torpid
Originally posted by: Buickbeast
sigh, I would rather see new stuff rather than the same rehashed jokes.

Better stop watching kevin smith films then...

No, it's just alot of us where hoping he would move on after Jay and Silent Bob like he said he would.

Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
another decent movie that will be ruined by its sequel

Originally posted by: SpunkyJones
I thought he retired these characters, and was going to move on?
 
Originally posted by: pulse8
Kevin Smith is done.

He had his time and made some good movies, but unless he does something fresh and new he is going to fade into obscurity.
They said that about george lucas.
 
Originally posted by: SampSon
Originally posted by: pulse8
Kevin Smith is done.

He had his time and made some good movies, but unless he does something fresh and new he is going to fade into obscurity.
They said that about george lucas.

Yea, and star wars sucked ass. Nooge.
 
Originally posted by: amcdonald
Originally posted by: SampSon
Originally posted by: pulse8
Kevin Smith is done.

He had his time and made some good movies, but unless he does something fresh and new he is going to fade into obscurity.
They said that about george lucas.

Yea, and star wars sucked ass. Nooge.
I'd like to produce a series that sucked that much.
 
Originally posted by: amcdonald
Originally posted by: SampSon
Originally posted by: pulse8
Kevin Smith is done.

He had his time and made some good movies, but unless he does something fresh and new he is going to fade into obscurity.
They said that about george lucas.

Yea, and star wars sucked ass. Nooge.

Yeah, and it must suck being one of the richest men in the world because of how bad his series sucked. 😉
 
I was kidding. I have not yet mastered the online sarcasm.
Anyway, Kevin Smith should leave well enough alone and break away from these characters.
I love the movies, but the horse has been dead for awhile... plus, most people don't like it.
 
better be good.. unlike his last film which was beyond bad.
u know..when jlo and affleck mate, they apparently produce a little gremlin.
 
This was posted to another board I lurk on. Someone found it on the ViewAskew forums. Straight from the horse's mouth, so to speak:


- This isn't gonna be a cameo-heavy affair, a'la "Strike Back." The only returning characters are Dante and Randal, and Jay and Silent Bob.

- This isn't gonna be a star-studded affair. The biggest names in the cast are gonna be Brian O'Halloran, Jeff Anderson, and Jason Mewes.

- This isn't an "I'm not even supposed to be here today... AGAIN!"-heavy, wink-wink affair. We barely refer to the first flick (though I do love Lynch's proposed tagline of "They Still Don't Like You"; considering the tone of the script, an even more appropriate tagline would be "They Like You Even Less").

- Jay and Silent Bob have about as much screen time as they had in "Clerks." This is Dante and Randal's flick all the way.

- The title makes sense. Sure, there's a bit of cheekiness in there, but it's pretty appropriate, based on the material.

- This is the funniest thing I've ever written. It's also really poignant.

- We'll still be making a "Clerks" cartoon movie, separate of this.

- This is not a grab at the green. Saying so is kinda laughable, if you're privy to what I make per film now, vs. what I'll make for this film. Part of the idea about doing "Passion" is to strip away the trappings of success we've been enjoying for the last few years, in an effort to get to the raw and pure. None of us are making our usual salaries on this flick; we're all doing it favored-nations style, with deferments. If the flick does well, we'll get paid our full-freight on the back-end. If not, we did it for the love. But if I was "all about the green", I'd be gearing up for "Hornet" or "Fletch" instead. This one's about the passion; the passion of the "Clerks."

- Some of the key players from the "Clerks" saga who've already read the 143 page first draft: Mos, Jeff, Brian, John Pierson, Bob Hawk. Jay's reading the new, refined 119 page second draft this week. Once they were all on board, any doubt or hesitation I might've felt about monkeying with the original's legacy disappeared completely.

- This isn't about "Jersey Girl." While disappointed that we didn't do double the theatrical business we crawled to, I understand why what happened to that flick happened (considering how poorly "Gigli" did, I consider us kinda lucky that we got to 25m). If this is a reaction to anything, it's more of a reaction to "Green Hornet", and the trajectory my budgets have been taking lately. Before (and if) I direct "Hornet", I wanted to do something small and more me-like. While working on the "Clerks X" dvd, it became clear to me that "Passion" was the way to go.

- We almost did this flick three years ago, instead of "Strike Back." I'm glad we didn't, because I was able to say much more now than I would've then.

- There are gonna be lots of folks expressing disappointment or downright hostility with the idea of this movie. Let 'em vent. If it's all that bad, Xtian will just sweep it off the board. But the last thing I'm interested in is opinions on what I'm doing this early in the process, if at all. The beauty of making that first flick was being able to do it in a vacuum. Granted, I could've kept my mouth shut about it 'til we were done shooting; but with "Clerks X" coming out, it just felt right to share. Regardless - I don't want folks running here with reports of what's being said about the idea of this film at other boards. Don't waste your/my time with the braying of the jackasses. There's not even a movie to bray about yet. Once there is, if you still still feel the need to tell me what some random, knuckle-headed Talk Backer has to say about the finished product, then God bless. But until then, leave it in the locker room.

- Oh, who am I kidding? This flick makes me so happy, I'm not even bothered by the bitching (could still be even happier without it, though). I'm in love with this flick. If other folks aren't, I can't really say I'm concerned. I've read the script; they haven't. I have the benefit of insight into the flick beyond the title and the notion of it; they don't. The reaction is pretty much what I thought it'd be: a ton of positive, and minimal amount of bitching. Even if the equation was reversed, I'd still feel as good as I do now.

- At this point in my life, this flick makes absolute ****ing sense.

- I can't wait to shoot it, and I can't wait 'til you all see it.
 
Originally posted by: Encryptic
This was posted to another board I lurk on. Someone found it on the ViewAskew forums. Straight from the horse's mouth, so to speak:


- This isn't gonna be a cameo-heavy affair, a'la "Strike Back." The only returning characters are Dante and Randal, and Jay and Silent Bob.

- This isn't gonna be a star-studded affair. The biggest names in the cast are gonna be Brian O'Halloran, Jeff Anderson, and Jason Mewes.

- This isn't an "I'm not even supposed to be here today... AGAIN!"-heavy, wink-wink affair. We barely refer to the first flick (though I do love Lynch's proposed tagline of "They Still Don't Like You"; considering the tone of the script, an even more appropriate tagline would be "They Like You Even Less").

- Jay and Silent Bob have about as much screen time as they had in "Clerks." This is Dante and Randal's flick all the way.

- The title makes sense. Sure, there's a bit of cheekiness in there, but it's pretty appropriate, based on the material.

- This is the funniest thing I've ever written. It's also really poignant.

- We'll still be making a "Clerks" cartoon movie, separate of this.

- This is not a grab at the green. Saying so is kinda laughable, if you're privy to what I make per film now, vs. what I'll make for this film. Part of the idea about doing "Passion" is to strip away the trappings of success we've been enjoying for the last few years, in an effort to get to the raw and pure. None of us are making our usual salaries on this flick; we're all doing it favored-nations style, with deferments. If the flick does well, we'll get paid our full-freight on the back-end. If not, we did it for the love. But if I was "all about the green", I'd be gearing up for "Hornet" or "Fletch" instead. This one's about the passion; the passion of the "Clerks."

- Some of the key players from the "Clerks" saga who've already read the 143 page first draft: Mos, Jeff, Brian, John Pierson, Bob Hawk. Jay's reading the new, refined 119 page second draft this week. Once they were all on board, any doubt or hesitation I might've felt about monkeying with the original's legacy disappeared completely.

- This isn't about "Jersey Girl." While disappointed that we didn't do double the theatrical business we crawled to, I understand why what happened to that flick happened (considering how poorly "Gigli" did, I consider us kinda lucky that we got to 25m). If this is a reaction to anything, it's more of a reaction to "Green Hornet", and the trajectory my budgets have been taking lately. Before (and if) I direct "Hornet", I wanted to do something small and more me-like. While working on the "Clerks X" dvd, it became clear to me that "Passion" was the way to go.

- We almost did this flick three years ago, instead of "Strike Back." I'm glad we didn't, because I was able to say much more now than I would've then.

- There are gonna be lots of folks expressing disappointment or downright hostility with the idea of this movie. Let 'em vent. If it's all that bad, Xtian will just sweep it off the board. But the last thing I'm interested in is opinions on what I'm doing this early in the process, if at all. The beauty of making that first flick was being able to do it in a vacuum. Granted, I could've kept my mouth shut about it 'til we were done shooting; but with "Clerks X" coming out, it just felt right to share. Regardless - I don't want folks running here with reports of what's being said about the idea of this film at other boards. Don't waste your/my time with the braying of the jackasses. There's not even a movie to bray about yet. Once there is, if you still still feel the need to tell me what some random, knuckle-headed Talk Backer has to say about the finished product, then God bless. But until then, leave it in the locker room.

- Oh, who am I kidding? This flick makes me so happy, I'm not even bothered by the bitching (could still be even happier without it, though). I'm in love with this flick. If other folks aren't, I can't really say I'm concerned. I've read the script; they haven't. I have the benefit of insight into the flick beyond the title and the notion of it; they don't. The reaction is pretty much what I thought it'd be: a ton of positive, and minimal amount of bitching. Even if the equation was reversed, I'd still feel as good as I do now.

- At this point in my life, this flick makes absolute ****ing sense.

- I can't wait to shoot it, and I can't wait 'til you all see it.

good read.... hope the movie works.....

 
Every film since mallrats has been unwatchable. I consider Dogma to be one of the all time worst movies ever EVER. But I liked clerks, maybe this will be ok.
 
Originally posted by: mugs
I thought he was done with that series. Clerks was way overrated.

thats what i thought too.

i couldve swore he said no more jay and silent bob movies.

anyways, clerks was great.
 
i cant wait for it. i mean, smith hyped up a new clerks movie anyways years ago, so i see it as only living up to his promise, albeit a bit later. no crime there. i just hope he keeps the same flavor, pacing, and different story directions magic he used in the original. b&w would be nice, but if it does come out in color, i wont fault it. perhaps a choice for the viewer when the dvd drops?? :Q
 
Originally posted by: Encryptic
This was posted to another board I lurk on. Someone found it on the ViewAskew forums. Straight from the horse's mouth, so to speak:
[/i]

Great post :thumbsup:
I'm totally amped now 😀

 
Originally posted by: Jigga
I'm too lazy to read all this...only have one question.

Will it be filmed in black and white?

Originally posted by: anxi80
i cant wait for it. i mean, smith hyped up a new clerks movie anyways years ago, so i see it as only living up to his promise, albeit a bit later. no crime there. i just hope he keeps the same flavor, pacing, and different story directions magic he used in the original. b&w would be nice, but if it does come out in color, i wont fault it. perhaps a choice for the viewer when the dvd drops?? :Q

b&w doesnt really do it for me in the original film anyway, I really wouldn't have a preference... but I think it could go either way, based on the hype; The same but different *shrug*

 
Clerks is okay, it was GREAT at the time... Jay & Silent Bob Strike Back, Chasing Amy, Mall Rats, were all watchable and entertaining, nothing great... laughs throughout the movies.. Dogma was awesome ("naked chicks with big tits just don't fall out of the sky you know!") A lot of laughs, and it actually had somewhat of a plot. I'll watch Clerks 2 - I'm sure I'll be entertained by it. The plot will probably suck, but.. it's a friggin comedy! Comedies aren't about plots... Dramas are about plots. Comedies are about making you laugh, and almost all of Kevin Smith's movies have been pretty successful at doing that.

For those of you who feel the need to post something negative about the flick, may I suggest moviepoopshoot.com
 
Back
Top