Kerry interview on Hannity and Colmes

[conjur]

Anyone watching this?

I wish Kerry had been interviewed a bit by Hannity. It's always fun seeing Hannity have to eat his words!

 

[Zipp]

Hannity would eat him up and spit him out

 

[CADsortaGUY]

I see that he ducked the UN oil for food scandal question. tisk tisk tisk

Also I thought this was an interesting comment. I'd like to see a vid clip of it to see what he was going to say before he stopped himself

You're going to support $25 billion of emergency spending. Well, like the $87 billion in the past, will you wait to see how that's going to be funded before you put your final stamp on ...

KERRY: I will obviously. Nobody's going to -- if this money is legitimately urgent for the troops, nobody's going to leave the troops without the things that we need right now. But I want to see exactly what the plan is, and I want to see exactly where the money is going, and how much is, in reality, needed.

Nobody's going to vote against funding the troops? Is that what you were about to say? Oh wait...you did that once - good thing you caught yourself

CkG

 

[conjur]

Originally posted by: Zipp
Hannity would eat him up and spit him out

Hannity is a chump. He's a one-dimensional, partisan hack.

EVERY night he brings up the $87 billion bill vote. (Distortion and half-truth)

EVERY night he brings up Kerry voting against EVERY major weapons program (LIE)

EVERY night he brings up Kerry voting 350 times for higher taxes (LIE)


Hannity's key talking points have debunked multiple times but he insanely holds on to them and uses them every night in the hopes that somehow they'll magically become truth.

 

[ThePresence]

Hannity is a moron with NO debating skill whatsoever. That he is so popular is a sad commentary on our society.
Now I'd PAY alot to see Kerry on with Rush! That's be some quality TV/radio!

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: ThePresence
Hannity is a moron with NO debating skill whatsoever. That he is so popular is a sad commentary on our society.

Hannity is a meat faced wanker whose debating skills consist of screaming down those who disagree with him and cutting them off before they have a chance to rebuke his narrow minded arguments.

 

[viivo]

Also, he's ugly.

Really though, that show is a riot. For a while I tried counting how many times he would scream in interviews for the guests' mic to be cut.

I lost count.

 

[Commish]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: ThePresence
Hannity is a moron with NO debating skill whatsoever. That he is so popular is a sad commentary on our society.

Hannity is a meat faced wanker whose debating skills consist of screaming down those who disagree with him and cutting them off before they have a chance to rebuke his narrow minded arguments.

Kind of like O'Reilly.

 

[conjur]

O'Reilly's nowhere near as bad as Hannity. O'Reilly has some good points but he gets combative when on the defensive.

When Hannity is having his ass handed to him, he picks up his papers and shuffles them and taps them on his desk, he looks away or down, mumbles "well..."


It's funny!

 

[Don Vito Corleone]

Originally posted by: Commish

Kind of like O'Reilly.

I wouldn't say that. O'Reilly is certainly guilty of some arrogant bluster, but he is bright, and at least he embraces some issues on both sides of the political spectrum (as I think most reasonable people do). O'Reilly does, from time to time, seem to have an "I'll take my ball and go home" mentality when he appears to be beaten, however.

 

[conjur]

Apparently, Hannity played the full audio portion of the beheading incident. And, apparently, these were his words right after the clip played:

(Audible sigh.) It, this, it's unbelievable. Do you see what we're up against? How could anybody do that to another human being? How is that possible? And this is, I wrote this book, and I, I've not talked about my book purposefully, because I just think so many people just talk their book ad nauseum, and I did not want to do that. I'd love for you to read it. It's in bookstores everywhere and it's on Hannity.com.

 

[Forsythe]

The tape is not that bad. It's just a human getting his head cut off. It happens all the time in chechnya (not sure on spelling), anybody that ever tried slaughtering an animal will have tried something like it. And that stuff about "Do you see what we're up against? How could anybody do that to another human being?" is just silly. Killing happens all the time, even if it's extremist this time. If killing people is that hard, how come it happens all the time?

 

[Strk]

Originally posted by: Forsythe
The tape is not that bad. It's just a human getting his head cut off. It happens all the time in chechnya (not sure on spelling), anybody that ever tried slaughtering an animal will have tried something like it. And that stuff about "Do you see what we're up against? How could anybody do that to another human being?" is just silly. Killing happens all the time, even if it's extremist this time. If killing people is that hard, how come it happens all the time?

I think Conjur isn't talking about that part, more about the fact that he is plugging his book as he says "poor Nick Berg"

 

[EXman]

Originally posted by: Forsythe
The tape is not that bad. It's just a human getting his head cut off. It happens all the time in chechnya (not sure on spelling), anybody that ever tried slaughtering an animal will have tried something like it. And that stuff about "Do you see what we're up against? How could anybody do that to another human being?" is just silly. Killing happens all the time, even if it's extremist this time. If killing people is that hard, how come it happens all the time?

cause there are over 5 billion people on earth bub there are gonna be a few psycho bad apples

 

[kage69]

Hannity is a meat faced wanker whose debating skills consist of screaming down those who disagree with him and cutting them off before they have a chance to rebuke his narrow minded arguments.

Bingo.

 

[tallest1]

Originally posted by: conjur
Apparently, Hannity played the full audio portion of the beheading incident. And, apparently, these were his words right after the clip played:

(Audible sigh.) It, this, it's unbelievable. Do you see what we're up against? How could anybody do that to another human being? How is that possible? And this is, I wrote this book, and I, I've not talked about my book purposefully, because I just think so many people just talk their book ad nauseum, and I did not want to do that. I'd love for you to read it. It's in bookstores everywhere and it's on Hannity.com.

funniest book plug ever

 

[conjur]

Originally posted by: Forsythe
The tape is not that bad. It's just a human getting his head cut off. It happens all the time in chechnya (not sure on spelling), anybody that ever tried slaughtering an animal will have tried something like it. And that stuff about "Do you see what we're up against? How could anybody do that to another human being?" is just silly. Killing happens all the time, even if it's extremist this time. If killing people is that hard, how come it happens all the time?

You have no problem with Sean using that audio clip as a way to boost sales of his book (that has peaked and dropping down the lists now)?

 

[EXman]

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: Zipp
Hannity would eat him up and spit him out

Hannity is a chump. He's a one-dimensional, partisan hack.

EVERY night he brings up the $87 billion bill vote. (Distortion and half-truth)

EVERY night he brings up Kerry voting against EVERY major weapons program (LIE)

EVERY night he brings up Kerry voting 350 times for higher taxes (LIE)


Hannity's key talking points have debunked multiple times but he insanely holds on to them and uses them every night in the hopes that somehow they'll magically become truth.

what are you smoking that vote was against 87 billion plain and simple how can you distort a fact? It happened.

Kerry has voted against so many weapons programs it makes your head spin

Kerry does like taxes no matter how you spin that regardless of the number.

If you think they been debunked by a voting record and not some liberal rag then go ahead and prove it otherwise your "Opinion of the facts" is not correct. You should work for the NY Times

 

[Strk]

Originally posted by: EXman

what are you smoking that vote was against 87 billion plain and simple how can you distort a fact? It happened.

Kerry has voted against so many weapons programs it makes your head spin

Kerry does like taxes no matter how you spin that regardless of the number.

If you think they been debunked by a voting record and not some liberal rag then go ahead and prove it otherwise your "Opinion of the facts" is not correct. You should work for the NY Times

There is a bit of half-truth to the $87 billion, but there is no denying that he voted against it, although you can only beat a dead horse so much.(but Hannity seems to want to beat it until it is extraordinarily dead apparently)

Yes, he voted against weapons programs, but he also voted against a lot of useless programs that were supported by people like Dick Cheney and George Bush Sr. Some of the programs were dumb to vote against, but there were just as many, if not more, programs that were quite worthwhile to vote against.

Taxes? Well, you have to list them out. Sure, low taxes are good, but depending on what is being taxed, they aren't always evil.(well, to some they are )

 

[Forsythe]

Conjur; yes i absolutely do, but i no longer get surprised by stupid sales tricks, human stupidity will surprise me no more. Btw, i have no idea who he is, i was just trying to make a point!

 

[conjur]

Originally posted by: EXman

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: Zipp
Hannity would eat him up and spit him out

Hannity is a chump. He's a one-dimensional, partisan hack.

EVERY night he brings up the $87 billion bill vote. (Distortion and half-truth)

EVERY night he brings up Kerry voting against EVERY major weapons program (LIE)

EVERY night he brings up Kerry voting 350 times for higher taxes (LIE)


Hannity's key talking points have debunked multiple times but he insanely holds on to them and uses them every night in the hopes that somehow they'll magically become truth.

what are you smoking that vote was against 87 billion plain and simple how can you distort a fact? It happened.

Kerry has voted against so many weapons programs it makes your head spin

Kerry does like taxes no matter how you spin that regardless of the number.

If you think they been debunked by a voting record and not some liberal rag then go ahead and prove it otherwise your "Opinion of the facts" is not correct. You should work for the NY Times

Since ignorance is bliss, you're obviously the happiest dumbfvck on the face of the earth!!

Try some reading for a change:

http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=177
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=167
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=159
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=155
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=153
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=154
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=147

 

[EXman]

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: EXman

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: Zipp
Hannity would eat him up and spit him out

Hannity is a chump. He's a one-dimensional, partisan hack.

EVERY night he brings up the $87 billion bill vote. (Distortion and half-truth)

EVERY night he brings up Kerry voting against EVERY major weapons program (LIE)

EVERY night he brings up Kerry voting 350 times for higher taxes (LIE)


Hannity's key talking points have debunked multiple times but he insanely holds on to them and uses them every night in the hopes that somehow they'll magically become truth.

what are you smoking that vote was against 87 billion plain and simple how can you distort a fact? It happened.

Kerry has voted against so many weapons programs it makes your head spin

Kerry does like taxes no matter how you spin that regardless of the number.

If you think they been debunked by a voting record and not some liberal rag then go ahead and prove it otherwise your "Opinion of the facts" is not correct. You should work for the NY Times

Since ignorance is bliss, you're obviously the happiest dumbfvck on the face of the earth!!

Try some reading for a change:

http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=177
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=167
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=159
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=155
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=153
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=154
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=147

You are maing yourself look like a goober using that as a referance.

go to the bottom of that page for the goverenment websites it has Kerry voting against any military increase. It also says he voted against SDI, MX Missiles, tomahawks (Clinton's weapon of choice), Apache helicopter and here is a internal memo :

In this 1984 campaign memo (which a Kerry spokesman confirms is genuine) the candidate called for cutting Ronald Reagan?s military budget by between $45 billion and $53 billion through (among other things) cancellation of the MX missile, B-1 bomber, anti-satellite weapons, and the ?Star Wars? anti-missile program, along with several conventional weapons that have become mainstays of the present-day military, including the AH-64 Apache helicopter, the Aegis air-defense cruiser, and the F-14 and F-15 fighters. He also called for a 50% reduction in the Tomahawk cruise missile.

those 4 highlighted are esential parts of the military what we gonna use Huey's, Biplanes , and rowboats?
The Aegis is our Do-All ship how can you vote against that?

 

[conjur]

Originally posted by: EXman

Originally posted by: conjur
Since ignorance is bliss, you're obviously the happiest dumbfvck on the face of the earth!!

Try some reading for a change:

http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=177
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=167
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=159
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=155
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=153
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=154
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=147

You are maing [sic] yourself look like a goober using that as a referance [sic].

go [sic] to the bottom of that page for the goverenment [sic] websites [sic] it [sic] has Kerry voting against any military increase. It also says he voted against SDI, MX Missiles, tomahawks (Clinton's weapon of choice), Apache helicopter and here is a [sic] internal memo :

In this 1984 campaign memo (which a Kerry spokesman confirms is genuine) the candidate called for cutting Ronald Reagan?s military budget by between $45 billion and $53 billion through (among other things) cancellation of the MX missile, B-1 bomber, anti-satellite weapons, and the ?Star Wars? anti-missile program, along with several conventional weapons that have become mainstays of the present-day military, including the AH-64 Apache helicopter, the Aegis air-defense cruiser, and the F-14 and F-15 fighters. He also called for a 50% reduction in the Tomahawk cruise missile.

those 4 highlighted are esential parts of the military what we gonna use Huey's, Biplanes , and rowboats?
The Aegis is our Do-All ship how can you vote against that?

Keep reading, Exman, and you'll find enlightenment.

Why don't you quote the parts that show Cheney opposed those very same programs?

 

[Strk]

Originally posted by: conjur

Keep reading, Exman, and you'll find enlightenment.

Why don't you quote the parts that show Cheney opposed those very same programs?

And complained because he couldn't get all of them

 

[EXman]

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: EXman

Originally posted by: conjur
Since ignorance is bliss, you're obviously the happiest dumbfvck on the face of the earth!!

Try some reading for a change:

http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=177
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=167
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=159
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=155
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=153
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=154
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=147

You are maing [sic] yourself look like a goober using that as a referance [sic].

go [sic] to the bottom of that page for the goverenment [sic] websites [sic] it [sic] has Kerry voting against any military increase. It also says he voted against SDI, MX Missiles, tomahawks (Clinton's weapon of choice), Apache helicopter and here is a [sic] internal memo :

In this 1984 campaign memo (which a Kerry spokesman confirms is genuine) the candidate called for cutting Ronald Reagan?s military budget by between $45 billion and $53 billion through (among other things) cancellation of the MX missile, B-1 bomber, anti-satellite weapons, and the ?Star Wars? anti-missile program, along with several conventional weapons that have become mainstays of the present-day military, including the AH-64 Apache helicopter, the Aegis air-defense cruiser, and the F-14 and F-15 fighters. He also called for a 50% reduction in the Tomahawk cruise missile.

those 4 highlighted are esential parts of the military what we gonna use Huey's, Biplanes , and rowboats?
The Aegis is our Do-All ship how can you vote against that?

Keep reading, Exman, and you'll find enlightenment.

Why don't you quote the parts that show Cheney opposed those very same programs?

Cheney is not Running for pres Kerry is. Kerry is the Vet not Chaney (as you all love to point out) . Chaney does not have a voting record. We are not talking about Cheney and his voting record are we? No

who gives a rip who is the VP not like Bush is gonna take a dirtnap anytime soon.