• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Kerry 'Flips Off' Vietnam Vet

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Corn
With apologies to Vic for repeating a similar message.......

The real and thoughful conservatives witihn the Republican party have no use for morons like Edge3d, Passions, and the long gone Texmaster. Do us all a favor and and help to improve our image by refraining from opening you ignorant mouths, puh-leeze.

That invitation is also extended to those morons who fit the same mold as the above mentioned three, but with opposing political sensibilities. You know who you are.

Thank you all and good day.
:beer::beer::beer:
 
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
So, um, Alchemize? Anyone else pick up this story and verify it today? I sure hope we didn't spend so much time responding to a completely fabricated story. Otherwise, you ga some 'splainen to do. 😛

What's to explain? I'm not a journalist, or a documentary maker (although the latter certainly doesn't need multiple verifiable sources). I report, you decide 😉

washington times picked up up, but just another newsmax posting How's that for another unimpeachable news source? 😉

Edit: Updated! May be caught on film!!

Just as I suspected -- there's nothing to this story. Looks like pure fabrication to me. Let me know when you dig up some real dirt . . . preferably with video next time.

Confirmed by another source!! 😉
 
Originally posted by: Corn
Removing the religious right's influence from the Republican Party will make me infinitely happier than their support of candidates who truely don't fit the values of the Republican party.
Corn! You bring a tear of genuine appreciation to my eye! :heart:
 
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
So, um, Alchemize? Anyone else pick up this story and verify it today? I sure hope we didn't spend so much time responding to a completely fabricated story. Otherwise, you ga some 'splainen to do. 😛

What's to explain? I'm not a journalist, or a documentary maker (although the latter certainly doesn't need multiple verifiable sources). I report, you decide 😉

washington times picked up up, but just another newsmax posting How's that for another unimpeachable news source? 😉

Edit: Updated! May be caught on film!!

Just as I suspected -- there's nothing to this story. Looks like pure fabrication to me. Let me know when you dig up some real dirt . . . preferably with video next time.

Confirmed by another source!! 😉
Is a drug addict a reliable source?😉
 
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
So, um, Alchemize? Anyone else pick up this story and verify it today? I sure hope we didn't spend so much time responding to a completely fabricated story. Otherwise, you ga some 'splainen to do. 😛

What's to explain? I'm not a journalist, or a documentary maker (although the latter certainly doesn't need multiple verifiable sources). I report, you decide 😉

washington times picked up up, but just another newsmax posting How's that for another unimpeachable news source? 😉

Edit: Updated! May be caught on film!!

Just as I suspected -- there's nothing to this story. Looks like pure fabrication to me. Let me know when you dig up some real dirt . . . preferably with video next time.

Confirmed by another source!! 😉

So far you have a tabloid reporting an incident, a right-wing rag parroting that incident, and then a right-wing blowhard talking about it on his talk radio infotainment show.

Wow...hard to beat that!
 
Oh my god, edge3d was so owned it's not even funny. Well actually, it is. LOLOLOLOLOLOL.

Anyway... Wait a minute, they're talking about TED SAMPLEY!?

Ted Sampley, the one who told a family of a pilot shot down over iraq and missing as MIA that their son had been cut into several pieces and those pieces distributed among iraqis? Then later when the pilot was recovered and returned home alive, sampley admitted he made the whole thing up?

http://www.miafacts.org/prankster.htm

The same ted sampley who claimed John McCain was brainwashed by the north vietnamese and worked for the KGB? The same ted sampley who beat up one of McCain's staffers?

THAT ted sampley?!?! Alchemize, you need to find a better source than that shill troll of a 'news' organization, newsmax.
 
Originally posted by: Corn
With apologies to Vic for repeating a similar message.......

The real and thoughful conservatives witihn the Republican party have no use for morons like Edge3d, Passions, and the long gone Texmaster. Do us all a favor and and help to improve our image by refraining from opening you ignorant mouths, puh-leeze.

That invitation is also extended to those morons who fit the same mold as the above mentioned three, but with opposing political sensibilities. You know who you are.

Thank you all and good day.

I'd also add heartsurgeon to that list. He's the biggest republican kool-aid drinking shill on this forum. And he WANTS socialized health care, isn't that a hoot?
 
Wow. I recall ALL the liberals who used to say that military records meant nothing back when it was Clinton vs. Dole. Clinton dodged the draft, and all the liberals said it meant nothing. Now it's a big issue. Hypocrites...
 
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Wow. I recall ALL the liberals who used to say that military records meant nothing back when it was Clinton vs. Dole. Clinton dodged the draft, and all the liberals said it meant nothing. Now it's a big issue. Hypocrites...

Ah, the ole 'Clinton' throwback again. Yes Clinton dodged the draft, but did he lie or try to hide it? No. Did Bush try to hide why he never went from reserves to active duty in vietnam? Yes.
 
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: Gaard

Yep, one more name gets added to the 'yellow' list.

What's the yellow list?


It's just a mental list of members who run away after being disproven, caught in a lie, or just refuse to admit to being wrong.
 
Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: Gaard

Yep, one more name gets added to the 'yellow' list.

What's the yellow list?


It's just a mental list of members who run away after being disproven, caught in a lie, or just refuse to admit to being wrong.

You are lying, this list doesn't exist. I gotta go.
 
Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: Gaard

Yep, one more name gets added to the 'yellow' list.

What's the yellow list?


It's just a mental list of members who run away after being disproven, caught in a lie, or just refuse to admit to being wrong.

Can you share it with us? (This thread has veered radically off-topic as it is).

I have noticed there's those that start threads and basically never come back (or maybe they post once again). I find this especially bothersome. It seems like a very odd thing to do considering this is a discussion board. Why post if you don't want to see the replies? Actually, I'm thinking of one person in particular.
 
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: Gaard

Yep, one more name gets added to the 'yellow' list.

What's the yellow list?


It's just a mental list of members who run away after being disproven, caught in a lie, or just refuse to admit to being wrong.

Can you share it with us? (This thread has veered radically off-topic as it is).

I have noticed there's those that start threads and basically never come back (or maybe they post once again). I find this especially bothersome. It seems like a very odd thing to do considering this is a discussion board. Why post if you don't want to see the replies? Actually, I'm thinking of one person in particular.


This thread not only is a good example, I also supply a few links to some other examples.
 
Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: Gaard

Yep, one more name gets added to the 'yellow' list.

What's the yellow list?


It's just a mental list of members who run away after being disproven, caught in a lie, or just refuse to admit to being wrong.

Can you share it with us? (This thread has veered radically off-topic as it is).

I have noticed there's those that start threads and basically never come back (or maybe they post once again). I find this especially bothersome. It seems like a very odd thing to do considering this is a discussion board. Why post if you don't want to see the replies? Actually, I'm thinking of one person in particular.


This thread not only is a good example, I also supply a few links to some other examples.

heh heh

I can think of several others, too.

They're typically the ones most acerbic in their postings and also more firmly in support of Bush. Funny how that works.
 
Originally posted by: PELarson

Here is a more interesting story. Same day and same location, with John Kerry!

"A Brother as President
Leonard Ignatowski is a member of VVA Chapter 227 in northern Virginia. He sent in this account of his visit to the Wall on Memorial Day. "

Here is a more interesting story. Same day and same location, with John Kerry but no Ted Sampley!
 
Back
Top