Sounds moderate and sensible to me.''I've been a hunter all my life, and I'm a gun owner, and I've never thought of going hunting with an AK-47. I believe in the Second Amendment.''
Novak article
Sounds moderate and sensible to me.''I've been a hunter all my life, and I'm a gun owner, and I've never thought of going hunting with an AK-47. I believe in the Second Amendment.''
No difference whatsoever and quite legal if used with magazines (ex: 5-shot) conforming to local regulations. Some states frown on .223 for larger game though. Service rifles generally have a longer barrel life too.Originally posted by: shinerburke
If I remember correctly Kerry is a duck hunter...nobody in their right mind would hunt ducks with an AK or any kind of rifle for that matter. However I know more than a few deer hunters who use AK's, AR15's, etc....to hunt with since they make damn good hunting rilfes. No different than my Remington Woodsmaster 740 30.06 really.....
I'm going to give Kerry the benefit of the doubt here. I believe Kerry when he professes belief in and support of the Second Amendment. Unfortunately, it is equally apparent to me that Kerry doesn't understand or perhaps has never read the Second Amendment.''I've been a hunter all my life, and I'm a gun owner, and I've never thought of going hunting with an AK-47. I believe in the Second Amendment.''
Originally posted by: tcsenter
I'm going to give Kerry the benefit of the doubt here. I believe Kerry when he professes belief in and support of the Second Amendment. Unfortunately, it is equally apparent to me that Kerry doesn't understand or perhaps has never read the Second Amendment.''I've been a hunter all my life, and I'm a gun owner, and I've never thought of going hunting with an AK-47. I believe in the Second Amendment.''
Does he think the Second Amendment is about hunting ducks? Among the many uses of the word "militia" I've ever encountered, none were used to mean "a party of duck hunters".
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Originally posted by: tcsenter
I'm going to give Kerry the benefit of the doubt here. I believe Kerry when he professes belief in and support of the Second Amendment. Unfortunately, it is equally apparent to me that Kerry doesn't understand or perhaps has never read the Second Amendment.''I've been a hunter all my life, and I'm a gun owner, and I've never thought of going hunting with an AK-47. I believe in the Second Amendment.''
Does he think the Second Amendment is about hunting ducks? Among the many uses of the word "militia" I've ever encountered, none were used to mean "a party of duck hunters".
Do you seriously think an armed citizenry is going to protect us from a despotic government?
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Originally posted by: tcsenter
I'm going to give Kerry the benefit of the doubt here. I believe Kerry when he professes belief in and support of the Second Amendment. Unfortunately, it is equally apparent to me that Kerry doesn't understand or perhaps has never read the Second Amendment.''I've been a hunter all my life, and I'm a gun owner, and I've never thought of going hunting with an AK-47. I believe in the Second Amendment.''
Does he think the Second Amendment is about hunting ducks? Among the many uses of the word "militia" I've ever encountered, none were used to mean "a party of duck hunters".
Do you seriously think an armed citizenry is going to protect us from a despotic government?
Foreign or domestic?
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Do you seriously think an armed citizenry is going to protect us from a despotic government?
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Just look at Iraq for example. As a nation, even under Saddam they were some of the most heavily armed people on earth. Having an armed citizenry did absolutely nothing however to protect thier rights against either thier own government or foreign invaders.
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Just look at Iraq for example. As a nation, even under Saddam they were some of the most heavily armed people on earth. Having an armed citizenry did absolutely nothing however to protect thier rights against either thier own government or foreign invaders.
They were going from the tyranny of a dictator to the bumbling of a new democracy...what did they have to fight for? We've lived under freedom and democracy for centuries and will all probably prefer to die than be placed under any other form of government.
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Originally posted by: tcsenter
I'm going to give Kerry the benefit of the doubt here. I believe Kerry when he professes belief in and support of the Second Amendment. Unfortunately, it is equally apparent to me that Kerry doesn't understand or perhaps has never read the Second Amendment.''I've been a hunter all my life, and I'm a gun owner, and I've never thought of going hunting with an AK-47. I believe in the Second Amendment.''
Does he think the Second Amendment is about hunting ducks? Among the many uses of the word "militia" I've ever encountered, none were used to mean "a party of duck hunters".
Do you seriously think an armed citizenry is going to protect us from a despotic government?
I am however baffelled when people think that guns are the final arbriter of freedom. Your guns are useless against the power of the state.
In this country, perhaps not "protect" against the despot in the classical sense, but rather dissuade those holding despotic aspirations.Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Do you seriously think an armed citizenry is going to protect us from a despotic government?
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Anyone remember that the 'Citizens' of Iraq are armed to the teeth -
with weapons that we would never allow in the hands of US citizens ?
Wasn't much help against their 'Despotic Government', was it.
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Anyone remember that the 'Citizens' of Iraq are armed to the teeth -
with weapons that we would never allow in the hands of US citizens ?
Wasn't much help against their 'Despotic Government', was it.
I already mentioned that.![]()
Whether any given armed citizenry would prevail over any given tyrannical government remains and will remain an open [academic] question.Do you seriously think an armed citizenry is going to protect us from a despotic government?
Algeria, Vietnam and Somalia were not movies.Originally posted by: BDawg
Either / Or
Any army that can get enough troops here to invade will whip the crap out of local militias. Red Dawn was just a movie.
Originally posted by: burnedout
Algeria, Vietnam and Somalia were not movies.Originally posted by: BDawg
Either / Or
Any army that can get enough troops here to invade will whip the crap out of local militias. Red Dawn was just a movie.
From another perspective, if two ex-GIs can obliterate 166 people in Oklahoma City, imagine what 20,000 similarly trained and motivated individuals might accomplish.
