Keith Ellison resigns from DNC post

[fskimospy]

Is that like the woman accusing Kavanaugh said her best friend was there... but her best friend said she has no memory of anything or being at a party with Brett Kavanaugh.

Nope, not in the slightest. Her friend said she couldn’t remember either way but that she believed her. So really it’s the polar opposite. In that case Ford became even more credible and in this case the woman became much less credible.

Don’t be silly, you already knew that I’m sure.

 

[Thump553]

Typical "So what"... Are you saying that it matters or not?

I didn't win, America won, due process.
The whole innocent until proven guilty thing. The same thing hold true for Ellison also, they need more than she said.

Do you honestly not understand Kavanaugh was NOT in a criminal trial? He was in a job interview process. to determine whether he met the ethical and legal abilities to sit on the top court in the land. During which he lied repeatedly in his sworn testimony and also in his sworn testimony vowed to retaliate against liberals, Democrats and others he deemed to be his political enemies? And you honestly think due process had anything to do with placing a joker like that on the Court?

 

[umbrella39]

Do you honestly not understand Kavanaugh was NOT in a criminal trial? He was in a job interview process. to determine whether he met the ethical and legal abilities to sit on the top court in the land. During which he lied repeatedly in his sworn testimony and also in his sworn testimony vowed to retaliate against liberals, Democrats and others he deemed to be his political enemies? And you honestly think due process had anything to do with placing a joker like that on the Court?

I've had it with that poster's intellectual dishonesty now, too. Another to the plonk list. Fuck these traitors until 2020...

 

[fskimospy]

Do you honestly not understand Kavanaugh was NOT in a criminal trial? He was in a job interview process. to determine whether he met the ethical and legal abilities to sit on the top court in the land. During which he lied repeatedly in his sworn testimony and also in his sworn testimony vowed to retaliate against liberals, Democrats and others he deemed to be his political enemies? And you honestly think due process had anything to do with placing a joker like that on the Court?

It’s bizarre how these clowns think that people in job interviews have the same rights as people the state might try to imprison or execute.

I really wonder if they have ever held real jobs in life. How else would you not know this?

 

[Jhhnn]

Ka-va-naugh! is the new Conservative self righteousness routine of distraction. But Hillary! has apparently lost its flavor.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

His Ex claims abuse. Yet there's no evidence of it, eh?

If it's he said / she said, then I fully endorse taking no action against the man.

Investigate it, proceed with whatever findings the investigation renders.

 

[pcgeek11]

The most important part in all of this is that the Fox headline is dishonest & inflammatory. The OP fell for it, and I suspect a lot of others have as well. The accusation against Ellison never was sexual assault.

I agree.

 

[pcgeek11]

Nope, not in the slightest. Her friend said she couldn’t remember either way but that she believed her. So really it’s the polar opposite. In that case Ford became even more credible and in this case the woman became much less credible.

Don’t be silly, you already knew that I’m sure.

"Her friend said she couldn’t remember either way"

That doesn't increase credibility. It means nothing either way. Both women made claims and neither have any real evidence to back it up.

 

[pcgeek11]

I've had it with that poster's intellectual dishonesty now, too. Another to the plonk list. Fuck these traitors until 2020...

LOL, Go for it spunky.

 

[fskimospy]

"Her friend said she couldn’t remember either way"

That doesn't increase credibility. It means nothing either way. Both women made claims and neither have any real evidence to back it up.

Ellison’s accuser stated she had video evidence to back up her claim and then refused to produce it. This indicates she was lying about it, which tanks her credibility.

In Ford’s case her friend did not say she was lying, she said that she couldn’t remember but believes Ford. That’s a statement to her character and it increases her credibility.

That should settle it.

 

[pcgeek11]

Ellison’s accuser stated she had video evidence to back up her claim and then refused to produce it. This indicates she was lying about it, which tanks her credibility.

In Ford’s case her friend did not say she was lying, she said that she couldn’t remember but believes Ford. That’s a statement to her character and it increases her credibility.

That should settle it.

If she has no memory of it how does it increase the credibility. In my opinion it doesn't. We disagree as always. You're welcome to your opinion as always and I mine.

 

[fskimospy]

If she has no memory of it how does it increase the credibility. In my opinion it doesn't. We disagree as always. You're welcome to your opinion as always and I mine.

Now your backpedaling because you don’t want to admit your comparison was wrong.

 

[SlowSpyder]

Now your backpedaling because you don’t want to admit your comparison was wrong.

He made a perfectly logical statement. You are very petty.

 

[pcgeek11]

Now your backpedaling because you don’t want to admit your comparison was wrong.

No, I'm not back pedaling at all. My comparison was spot on.

Neither had any evidence other than their words. Just because her "Best Friend" don't remember and believes her anyway is not supporting evidence.

 

[fskimospy]

No, I'm not back pedaling at all. My comparison was spot on.

Neither had any evidence other than their words. Just because her "Best Friend" don't remember and believes her anyway is not supporting evidence.

One of them made a statement that now appears to be false. The other did not. In any court, anywhere, one is vastly more credible than the other.

Why can’t you admit you made a mistake?

 

[pcgeek11]

One of them made a statement that now appears to be false. The other did not. In any court, anywhere, one is vastly more credible than the other.

Why can’t you admit you made a mistake?

Because I didn't make a mistake. Neither have any supporting evidence for their verbal claims.

Why can't you admit that your logic is flawed?

 

[feralkid]

Just revisited this thread...sorry for the poor choice of words. Ellison is NOT leaving due to sexual assault claims. I went ahead and edited the original post

Really? I'm still seeing it.

amid sexual assault claims:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/keith-ellison-resigns-from-dnc-post-amid-sexual-assault-claims


#1 echo4747, Yesterday at 9:13 AM
Last edited: Yesterday at 1:38 PM

 

[fskimospy]

Because I didn't make a mistake. Neither have any supporting evidence for their verbal claims.

Why can't you admit that your logic is flawed?

You tried to claim they were equally credible and that was clearly wrong. My logic is correct and you know it.

You never know when to stop digging, haha.

 

[Jhhnn]

Really? I'm still seeing it.

amid sexual assault claims:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/keith-ellison-resigns-from-dnc-post-amid-sexual-assault-claims


#1 echo4747, Yesterday at 9:13 AM
Last edited: Yesterday at 1:38 PM

You mean... Fox News lies?!

 

[jackstar7]

You tried to claim they were equally credible and that was clearly wrong. My logic is correct and you know it.

You never know when to stop digging, haha.

Your mistake is stating that he knows it.

He's a modern know-nothing.

 

[pcgeek11]

You tried to claim they were equally credible and that was clearly wrong. My logic is correct and you know it.

You never know when to stop digging, haha.

No, I don't know it. They both have no evidence to back them up.

Just because you say something doesn't make it so.

 

[brycejones]

No, I don't know it. They both have no evidence to back them up.

Just because you say something doesn't make it so.

Whahhh....you can't make me listen to the logic and shit....whaaaahhhh

Petulant man baby speaks again.

 

[fskimospy]

No, I don't know it. They both have no evidence to back them up.

Just because you say something doesn't make it so.

Of course not, the facts I laid out that you are now ignoring make it so. Stop pouting about being wrong, it happens to everyone.

 

[pcgeek11]

Of course not, the facts I laid out that you are now ignoring make it so. Stop pouting about being wrong, it happens to everyone.

The facts, indeed.

The facts are that neither has any evidence to back up their claims.

1.) Said she had a video. She did not.
2.) Said she had witness'. She did not.

All we have in either case is she said... With no further evidence to back it up.

 

[fskimospy]

The facts, indeed.

The facts are that neither has any evidence to back up their claims.

1.) Said she had a video. She did not.
2.) Said she had witness'. She did not.

All we have in either case is she said... With no further evidence to back it up.

Ford did not claim she had witnesses that would testify in her support. The sign that you are wrong is that you’re now reduced to making things up about Ford to avoid admitting it.

You should have taken my advice to stop digging. I’m trying to help you!