melloyellow
Member
So I still have some old computers that have been replaced with new computers, and so I'm trying to decide what to do with the old computers - which parts to keep and which parts to scrap. Case/PSU/drives seem simple enough to reuse, but cpu/mobo/ram is less clear.
It seems the cheapest new set is to get an A6-6400k from microcenter for $45, and they throw in a free mobo. Then newegg sells 2x4gb ddr3 for $45, so I can either use all 8gb on one system, or split it between two systems. So cpu/mobo/ram for about $70 or $90, that seems super cheap. I don't think there's anything cheaper available new, not even am1 or atom systems, right?
So of the old computers I've got lying around, the newest system has a core 2 duo e6600, and even though amd apus are not highly regarded, that a6-6400k looks like it's still significantly faster than the e6600.
So I guess what I'm saying is that if the e6600 can easily handle whatever i decide to use it for, then I can keep using it, but if it ever has noticeable slowdowns, then I should probably just replace it with the a6 rather than deal with any frustrations. Anything older, I should probably just scrap then I guess. Maybe keep the hsf if it's reusable and better than stock.
So does that all sound about right?
Also, what's a e6600/a6-6400k system good for? Web browsing, general office work, htpc, experimenting with Linux... Anything but gaming and serious work stuff? I assume it can handle all 1080p playback, right?
It seems the cheapest new set is to get an A6-6400k from microcenter for $45, and they throw in a free mobo. Then newegg sells 2x4gb ddr3 for $45, so I can either use all 8gb on one system, or split it between two systems. So cpu/mobo/ram for about $70 or $90, that seems super cheap. I don't think there's anything cheaper available new, not even am1 or atom systems, right?
So of the old computers I've got lying around, the newest system has a core 2 duo e6600, and even though amd apus are not highly regarded, that a6-6400k looks like it's still significantly faster than the e6600.
So I guess what I'm saying is that if the e6600 can easily handle whatever i decide to use it for, then I can keep using it, but if it ever has noticeable slowdowns, then I should probably just replace it with the a6 rather than deal with any frustrations. Anything older, I should probably just scrap then I guess. Maybe keep the hsf if it's reusable and better than stock.
So does that all sound about right?
Also, what's a e6600/a6-6400k system good for? Web browsing, general office work, htpc, experimenting with Linux... Anything but gaming and serious work stuff? I assume it can handle all 1080p playback, right?