Keep it classy Trump

[fskimospy]

What is the %?

Who knows? Who cares? Haven't you shit your pants enough for one thread?

 

[agent00f]

Sure it is. One is a group that can't vote bow but hill and crew want to bring them here so they can vote in future elections. That's what the dems are about. Import as may votes as possible and buy them shit. Who cares what they believe. As long as they aren't white.

Yeah I guess it's pretty terrible that the white nationalists can't dictate which ethnicities can or can't be voters.

 

[LegendKiller]

Who knows? Who cares? Haven't you shit your pants enough for one thread?

Since you like labeling racists you should have no qualms in labeling other races, racist. Now why don't you go ahead and do that.

 

[LegendKiller]

Yeah I guess it's pretty terrible that the white nationalists can't dictate which ethnicities can or can't be voters.

Yeah, pretty terrible thst dems are focusing on bringing the next protected class in en masse and forgetting the last one quite easily. After all, who gives a shit about Americans, we need to worry about the rest of the world first.

 

[PokerGuy]

He should really bring Juanita Broaddrick to the debate. She's one of Bill Clinton's rape victims and a woman that Hillary Clinton attempted to destroy.

Agree with this, she would have been a good person to have there, so illary's hypocritical lines about supporting women and such tripe can be seen for what they are -- just more political lies.

 

[zinfamous]

No one in attendance, front row or otherwise, can participate in the debate. The only reason Mark Cuban would be in attendance and seated in the front row would be to throw off Trump. Its psychological warfare. She made the first move, he responded in kind. It's not that Trump isn't being sleazy, but sinking to his level is a mistake.

It is sad that Monday's debate will not center to policy or meaningful discussion. It will be each candidate seeing how deeply they can crawl under one another's skin to force an error.

Agreed with the first point, not so much the second. The Clinton's are shrewd and effective politicians and it has been the mistake of many over the last several decades to underestimate their skill.

I've heard from every single republican here that Hillary is sneaky and conniving, so it wonders me that anyone would be shocked she would pull such a sneaky maneuver as this?

And it really isn't that sneaky--Trump's weaknesses are both legion and quite plain. It's like he walks around with his carotid artery in full display for anyone willing to take a swipe and begin the bleeding of his fragile ego. Putting Cuban in direct line of fragile Trump--an actually successful, actually self-made, far wealthier businessman that is far better at Trump at everything Trump claims he is good at--indeed: the only ways that Trump defines himself (and Trump knows this)--is brilliance. This isn't sinking to his level. It's dropping the gauntlet and thrashing him at his own game before the opening bell.

As to your final statement: I'm not sure if you have ever watched one of these presidential "debates" before, but that is all they are ever meant to be. Nixon/Kennedy came close to actual policy debate and discussion--in retrospect, if you actually watch the tape, those guys were remarkably civil and agreed with each other far more often than not--but that was a one-off event that disappeared over the next decade and a half of presidential campaigns and as we all know, is only remembered for how "terrible" Nixon looked. Most who watch it/hear it agree that Nixon pretty much won on merit. This "debate" only reappeared with the first Carter campaign, as a necessary tactic such that the voters could actually be introduced to this Carter guy for the first time.

Lincoln/Douglass is the gold crown of such events, but that wasn't even attended. It was a discussion between the two individuals, known only after a long gap through letters and news releases. Nothing like that will ever happen again.

 

[zinfamous]

Yeah, pretty terrible thst dems are focusing on bringing the next protected class in en masse and forgetting the last one quite easily. After all, who gives a shit about Americans*, we need to worry about the rest of the world first.

*whites only need apply, obv

added salient annotation

 

[LegendKiller]

added salient annotation

There's only one side (uniparty) that is for practically unfettered immigration at the cost of all us workers while certain demographics have high unemployment.

 

[zinfamous]

There's only one side (uniparty) that is for practically unfettered immigration at the cost of all us workers while certain demographics have high unemployment.

please tell me, though, how immigration has hurt the Americans and the specific jobs that those Americans claim to want? How does sending them back to Mexico mean more jobs for US workers? Don't you think that a guy like Trump who prefers to hire cheap Mexican and Bangladeshi labor to make his crappy clothes would just send those jobs along with the cheap labor he ships back across his wall? You bet he would! And he'd be laughing all the way with dollar signs in his--erp, I mean his family's "blind trust"--eyes!

I don't like illegal immigration either--probably something you will never believe--but I don't know why sending away an actual revenue base: rent, sales tax, food, consumer income--is going to improve those communities in this country that actually depend on those laborers. I hope you are willing to pick those strawberries for $4 an hour, because otherwise many of those fields are going to find themselves in Mexico.

Republican voters have been duped so many cycles in a row it's fascinating when you find some that are actually capable of tying their shoes.

 

[Ackmed]

Hokay. Just embrace the fact that your candidate is the preferred candidate of white supremacists. More people on board the Trump Train, right???

Are you going to embrace the fact that your candidate is the preferred candidate for black racists? No, you won't. You'll deny like usual. Claiming the other side is worse, etc. Between you and a few more race gets injected too often when it's not a factor. Agent00f uses it more than anyone, saying "Brown people" like 4 times on one page of a topic. Always making reference to klans, white supremacist, etc. Getting to be just like him you are.

Keeping on harping about one sides racism while ignoring the other is hypocritical, but you still do it a lot.

added salient annotation

While he's usually way out there, seems to be pretty accurate about this one. Trying to get as many to vote for Hillary as possible.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...to-swear-in-new-citizens-due-to-election.html

 

[fskimospy]

Are you going to embrace the fact that your candidate is the preferred candidate for black racists? No, you won't. You'll deny like usual. Claiming the other side is worse, etc. Between you and a few more race gets injected too often when it's not a factor. Agent00f uses it more than anyone, saying "Brown people" like 4 times on one page of a topic. Always making reference to klans, white supremacist, etc. Getting to be just like him you are.

Keeping on harping about one sides racism while ignoring the other is hypocritical, but you still do it a lot.

I've never once denied such a thing and claiming that the other side is worse is not only okay, but is a totally logical thing that rational people should care about. These are all just attempts at deflection.

You have to admit it, the right has a serious racism problem.

 

[agent00f]

Yeah, pretty terrible thst dems are focusing on bringing the next protected class in en masse and forgetting the last one quite easily. After all, who gives a shit about Americans, we need to worry about the rest of the world first.

Thanks for demonstrating again that you think of americans as white, not to be sullied with those ethnics from the rest of the world.

Are you going to embrace the fact that your candidate is the preferred candidate for black racists? No, you won't. You'll deny like usual. Claiming the other side is worse, etc. Between you and a few more race gets injected too often when it's not a factor. Agent00f uses it more than anyone, saying "Brown people" like 4 times on one page of a topic. Always making reference to klans, white supremacist, etc. Getting to be just like him you are.

Yes, pretty much every minority group votes against the klan for rather obvious reasons. Just fyi, I use klan as shorthand for people dedicated to ensuring america remains a white controlled country.

 

[soundforbjt]

While he's usually way out there, seems to be pretty accurate about this one. Trying to get as many to vote for Hillary as possible.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...to-swear-in-new-citizens-due-to-election.html

Do you realize the yuuuuge jump in number of applications for citizenship since Trump's infamous "Mexico" speech at the start of his campaign?

 

[Roflmouth]

So Clinton gives Mark Cuban a ticket to the debate. He is an outspoken critic of Trump. So Trump responds by going classy, and suggests he will invite Gennifer Flowers to the debate. He could go with a myriad of Clinton critics but instead wants to be Trump-ish and stay classy. You go Donald you sleezeball.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/24/polit...fer-flowers-hillary-clinton-debate/index.html

"Washington (CNN)Donald Trump threatened Saturday to bring Gennifer Flowers, with whom Bill Clinton admitted to having a sexual relationship decades ago, to Monday's presidential debate.

The taunt is a response to prominent Trump critic Mark Cuban's plans to sit in the front row of the debate at the invitation of Hillary Clinton's campaign. It's the Republican nominee's latest public reference to the 42nd president's infidelity, which he has occasionally cited in his campaign to criticize his Democratic challenger.
"If dopey Mark Cuban of failed Benefactor fame wants to sit in the front row, perhaps I will put Jennifer Flowers right alongside of him!" Trump tweeted Saturday afternoon.
He soon deleted the original message and tweeted again with the correct spelling of Flowers' first name."

LOL, Clinton outflanked by Trump again. Maybe she should go back to complaining about cartoon frogs.

 

[agent00f]

LOL, Clinton outflanked by Trump again. Maybe she should go back to complaining about cartoon frogs.

Trump should invite you to show that enthusiasm for ethnically cleansing muslims or whatever else group you don't like. Really get out that genocide vote.

 

[Roflmouth]

Trump should invite you to show that enthusiasm for ethnically cleansing muslims or whatever else group you don't like. Really get out that genocide vote.

That's quite all right, I'm perfectly happy to remain here and shove your anti-black racist posts back into your fat face.

 

[agent00f]

That's quite all right, I'm perfectly happy to remain here and shove your anti-black racist posts back into your fat face.

You also make a pretty good tool to illustrate the simple trailer park mentality of his constituency. Really the sort of thing many conservatives these days are proud to exhibit and presumably vote for.