Exactly $2,943,660.75 as of noon today. Exchange rates, whee.Originally posted by: Luden 1.8 million pounds is about 3 million US dollars correct?
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
Originally posted by: spliffstar69
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
I always like saying if I'm a hired hitman and some of that blood money goes to say AIDS, Cancer research will it matter they wont know how the $$ was attained.
So now you're comparing what he does to being a hitman?!?!?!
I'm saying I don't know Reeves personally do you? If you do then having high regards for him is great.
If you don't and you still have high regards for him based on what you read or heard is ok also but.....
If you were to find out he's a drug smuggler tomorrow will you have that same respect that you had yesterday?
I guess it can be given and taken in a blink of an eye but for me it has to be more involved.
Well hell, i guess if you're going to live your life assuming outrageous things about people's character, then you're not going to have much respect for anybody.
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Those of you who think this makes him a role model should look at Bill Gates. The guy is giving his entire fortune to charity over the course of his life (100 Billion, I believe) and leaving only $10 million to each of his children. Of course his children will have many benefits and probably much more in assets by then, but Bill Gate is giving away a lot more, yet people call him evil. I agree that it is great that Keanu is giving this money away and I hope it makes him happy and I have lots of respect for him for doing it. However, I find most people's double standards a bit confusing. How can you love a guy who gives 50 million pounds to people who worked on a film, yet hate a guy who gives $100 billion to charity? I would argue that Keanu hardly did anything to earn that money (not that he doesn't deserve it) compared to Gates. I think this is the point that Viper is trying to make. All you people think he's a saint for simply giving money away, yet you don't even know the guy.
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Those of you who think this makes him a role model should look at Bill Gates. The guy is giving his entire fortune to charity over the course of his life (100 Billion, I believe) and leaving only $10 million to each of his children. Of course his children will have many benefits and probably much more in assets by then, but Bill Gate is giving away a lot more, yet people call him evil. I agree that it is great that Keanu is giving this money away and I hope it makes him happy and I have lots of respect for him for doing it. However, I find most people's double standards a bit confusing. How can you love a guy who gives 50 million pounds to people who worked on a film, yet hate a guy who gives $100 billion to charity? I would argue that Keanu hardly did anything to earn that money (not that he doesn't deserve it) compared to Gates. I think this is the point that Viper is trying to make. All you people think he's a saint for simply giving money away, yet you don't even know the guy.
Originally posted by: MachFive
Originally posted by: Cuda1447
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: Cuda1447
Wow, great guy. Is it really true that he's gay though? Just curious I heard he was.
Who gives a sh|t?
Im just curious if its true or not.
Why? Do you care who Meg Ryan bangs on weekends? Then why do you care who Keanu does?
Originally posted by: MachFive
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Those of you who think this makes him a role model should look at Bill Gates. The guy is giving his entire fortune to charity over the course of his life (100 Billion, I believe) and leaving only $10 million to each of his children. Of course his children will have many benefits and probably much more in assets by then, but Bill Gate is giving away a lot more, yet people call him evil. I agree that it is great that Keanu is giving this money away and I hope it makes him happy and I have lots of respect for him for doing it. However, I find most people's double standards a bit confusing. How can you love a guy who gives 50 million pounds to people who worked on a film, yet hate a guy who gives $100 billion to charity? I would argue that Keanu hardly did anything to earn that money (not that he doesn't deserve it) compared to Gates. I think this is the point that Viper is trying to make. All you people think he's a saint for simply giving money away, yet you don't even know the guy.
Please don't bring up Bill Gates.
Personally, I believe in the saying, "Your inheritance should be big enough that your children can do anything they want, but not big enough that they never have to do anything."
I believe in that. If I were Gates, I'd set up $10 million for each child in a trust fund that they could not touch until they graduated from college. And after I died, the rest would go to various charities.
$10 billion per child is DISGUSTING. No human being needs $10 billion to live.
And I'm right-leaning, for christsakes.
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
Originally posted by: MachFive
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Those of you who think this makes him a role model should look at Bill Gates. The guy is giving his entire fortune to charity over the course of his life (100 Billion, I believe) and leaving only $10 million to each of his children. Of course his children will have many benefits and probably much more in assets by then, but Bill Gate is giving away a lot more, yet people call him evil. I agree that it is great that Keanu is giving this money away and I hope it makes him happy and I have lots of respect for him for doing it. However, I find most people's double standards a bit confusing. How can you love a guy who gives 50 million pounds to people who worked on a film, yet hate a guy who gives $100 billion to charity? I would argue that Keanu hardly did anything to earn that money (not that he doesn't deserve it) compared to Gates. I think this is the point that Viper is trying to make. All you people think he's a saint for simply giving money away, yet you don't even know the guy.
Please don't bring up Bill Gates.
Personally, I believe in the saying, "Your inheritance should be big enough that your children can do anything they want, but not big enough that they never have to do anything."
I believe in that. If I were Gates, I'd set up $10 million for each child in a trust fund that they could not touch until they graduated from college. And after I died, the rest would go to various charities.
$10 billion per child is DISGUSTING. No human being needs $10 billion to live.
And I'm right-leaning, for christsakes.
Um, he's not leaving 10 billion per child... he's leaving 10 MILLION per child.
lol, that's funny on a couple levelsOriginally posted by: MachFive
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
Originally posted by: MachFive
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Those of you who think this makes him a role model should look at Bill Gates. The guy is giving his entire fortune to charity over the course of his life (100 Billion, I believe) and leaving only $10 million to each of his children. Of course his children will have many benefits and probably much more in assets by then, but Bill Gate is giving away a lot more, yet people call him evil. I agree that it is great that Keanu is giving this money away and I hope it makes him happy and I have lots of respect for him for doing it. However, I find most people's double standards a bit confusing. How can you love a guy who gives 50 million pounds to people who worked on a film, yet hate a guy who gives $100 billion to charity? I would argue that Keanu hardly did anything to earn that money (not that he doesn't deserve it) compared to Gates. I think this is the point that Viper is trying to make. All you people think he's a saint for simply giving money away, yet you don't even know the guy.
Please don't bring up Bill Gates.
Personally, I believe in the saying, "Your inheritance should be big enough that your children can do anything they want, but not big enough that they never have to do anything."
I believe in that. If I were Gates, I'd set up $10 million for each child in a trust fund that they could not touch until they graduated from college. And after I died, the rest would go to various charities.
$10 billion per child is DISGUSTING. No human being needs $10 billion to live.
And I'm right-leaning, for christsakes.
Um, he's not leaving 10 billion per child... he's leaving 10 MILLION per child.
**OFFICIAL** I got owned, can't read, and am an idiot **CONFIRMED**
;-)
Originally posted by: MachFive
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
Originally posted by: MachFive
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Those of you who think this makes him a role model should look at Bill Gates. The guy is giving his entire fortune to charity over the course of his life (100 Billion, I believe) and leaving only $10 million to each of his children. Of course his children will have many benefits and probably much more in assets by then, but Bill Gate is giving away a lot more, yet people call him evil. I agree that it is great that Keanu is giving this money away and I hope it makes him happy and I have lots of respect for him for doing it. However, I find most people's double standards a bit confusing. How can you love a guy who gives 50 million pounds to people who worked on a film, yet hate a guy who gives $100 billion to charity? I would argue that Keanu hardly did anything to earn that money (not that he doesn't deserve it) compared to Gates. I think this is the point that Viper is trying to make. All you people think he's a saint for simply giving money away, yet you don't even know the guy.
Please don't bring up Bill Gates.
Personally, I believe in the saying, "Your inheritance should be big enough that your children can do anything they want, but not big enough that they never have to do anything."
I believe in that. If I were Gates, I'd set up $10 million for each child in a trust fund that they could not touch until they graduated from college. And after I died, the rest would go to various charities.
$10 billion per child is DISGUSTING. No human being needs $10 billion to live.
And I'm right-leaning, for christsakes.
Um, he's not leaving 10 billion per child... he's leaving 10 MILLION per child.
**OFFICIAL** I got owned, can't read, and am an idiot **CONFIRMED**
;-)
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
Originally posted by: MachFive
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
Originally posted by: MachFive
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Those of you who think this makes him a role model should look at Bill Gates. The guy is giving his entire fortune to charity over the course of his life (100 Billion, I believe) and leaving only $10 million to each of his children. Of course his children will have many benefits and probably much more in assets by then, but Bill Gate is giving away a lot more, yet people call him evil. I agree that it is great that Keanu is giving this money away and I hope it makes him happy and I have lots of respect for him for doing it. However, I find most people's double standards a bit confusing. How can you love a guy who gives 50 million pounds to people who worked on a film, yet hate a guy who gives $100 billion to charity? I would argue that Keanu hardly did anything to earn that money (not that he doesn't deserve it) compared to Gates. I think this is the point that Viper is trying to make. All you people think he's a saint for simply giving money away, yet you don't even know the guy.
Please don't bring up Bill Gates.
Personally, I believe in the saying, "Your inheritance should be big enough that your children can do anything they want, but not big enough that they never have to do anything."
I believe in that. If I were Gates, I'd set up $10 million for each child in a trust fund that they could not touch until they graduated from college. And after I died, the rest would go to various charities.
$10 billion per child is DISGUSTING. No human being needs $10 billion to live.
And I'm right-leaning, for christsakes.
Um, he's not leaving 10 billion per child... he's leaving 10 MILLION per child.
**OFFICIAL** I got owned, can't read, and am an idiot **CONFIRMED**
;-)
So i guess your respect for Bill Gates just went up?
Originally posted by: MachFive
I believe in that. If I were Gates, I'd set up $10 million for each child in a trust fund that they could not touch until they graduated from college. And after I died, the rest would go to various charities.
$10 billion per child is DISGUSTING. No human being needs $10 billion to live.
And I'm right-leaning, for christsakes.
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
Originally posted by: MachFive
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
Originally posted by: MachFive
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Those of you who think this makes him a role model should look at Bill Gates. The guy is giving his entire fortune to charity over the course of his life (100 Billion, I believe) and leaving only $10 million to each of his children. Of course his children will have many benefits and probably much more in assets by then, but Bill Gate is giving away a lot more, yet people call him evil. I agree that it is great that Keanu is giving this money away and I hope it makes him happy and I have lots of respect for him for doing it. However, I find most people's double standards a bit confusing. How can you love a guy who gives 50 million pounds to people who worked on a film, yet hate a guy who gives $100 billion to charity? I would argue that Keanu hardly did anything to earn that money (not that he doesn't deserve it) compared to Gates. I think this is the point that Viper is trying to make. All you people think he's a saint for simply giving money away, yet you don't even know the guy.
Please don't bring up Bill Gates.
Personally, I believe in the saying, "Your inheritance should be big enough that your children can do anything they want, but not big enough that they never have to do anything."
I believe in that. If I were Gates, I'd set up $10 million for each child in a trust fund that they could not touch until they graduated from college. And after I died, the rest would go to various charities.
$10 billion per child is DISGUSTING. No human being needs $10 billion to live.
And I'm right-leaning, for christsakes.
Um, he's not leaving 10 billion per child... he's leaving 10 MILLION per child.
**OFFICIAL** I got owned, can't read, and am an idiot **CONFIRMED**
;-)
So i guess your respect for Bill Gates just went up?
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
Originally posted by: MachFive
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
Originally posted by: MachFive
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Those of you who think this makes him a role model should look at Bill Gates. The guy is giving his entire fortune to charity over the course of his life (100 Billion, I believe) and leaving only $10 million to each of his children. Of course his children will have many benefits and probably much more in assets by then, but Bill Gate is giving away a lot more, yet people call him evil. I agree that it is great that Keanu is giving this money away and I hope it makes him happy and I have lots of respect for him for doing it. However, I find most people's double standards a bit confusing. How can you love a guy who gives 50 million pounds to people who worked on a film, yet hate a guy who gives $100 billion to charity? I would argue that Keanu hardly did anything to earn that money (not that he doesn't deserve it) compared to Gates. I think this is the point that Viper is trying to make. All you people think he's a saint for simply giving money away, yet you don't even know the guy.
Please don't bring up Bill Gates.
Personally, I believe in the saying, "Your inheritance should be big enough that your children can do anything they want, but not big enough that they never have to do anything."
I believe in that. If I were Gates, I'd set up $10 million for each child in a trust fund that they could not touch until they graduated from college. And after I died, the rest would go to various charities.
$10 billion per child is DISGUSTING. No human being needs $10 billion to live.
And I'm right-leaning, for christsakes.
Um, he's not leaving 10 billion per child... he's leaving 10 MILLION per child.
**OFFICIAL** I got owned, can't read, and am an idiot **CONFIRMED**
;-)
So i guess your respect for Bill Gates just went up?
read more about bill gates views on inhereted wealth. he doesn't believe america is about building aristocracies. he's giving most of it away. does he believe in the "death tax" you bet he does.
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
Originally posted by: coldcut
Lizzie Maguire needs to learn from Keanu.
She's been mentioned in this thread again... who is she and what has she done?
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Isn't he in fact rewarding the very people that made the second matrix: suckfest reloaded, a reality? 🙁
And why not?Originally posted by: bigalt
i can't say that i think he deserved a cent of the money that was heaped on him by hollywood, but its pretty cool that he gave it away.
Originally posted by: randal
Wow. He doesn't own a house or anything either.
Originally posted by: Hector13
Originally posted by: randal
Wow. He doesn't own a house or anything either.
doesn't living in a hotel sound more expensive than buying a house?