Kavanaugh SCOTUS Senate Judicial Hearing

Page 249 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

SteveGrabowski

Diamond Member
Oct 20, 2014
8,949
7,661
136
Regardless...
Look at these OLD FARTS up there.
Totally dismissing all of Ford's testimony and blowing it off just because, well just because.
A bunch of old men, Grassley, etc, they should not be there.
We need term limits. Seriously....
No individual should be in congress for life. That should never be allowed and I am sure was never the intension of the founding fathers.

So, we have this poor woman, Ford, out there on one side all by herself.
And a group of old farts on the other side against Ford.
I wonder what old Grassley would have said if he had been the one assaulted, and everyone dismissed his accusations as nonsense?
Well, with Kavanagh on the court maybe we will get the chance to find out.

I guess democrats will need to revert to plan B.
Win in November, do a REAL investigation into Kavanagh, then impeach him off the court.

Grassley would have been happy to take a d*** to get another Republican seat on the supreme court.
 

jackstar7

Lifer
Jun 26, 2009
11,679
1,944
126
Why am I a piece of shit though?
I assume it has to do with how you were raised, and lingering feelings of inadequacy plaguing an ego that yearns to be more without putting in any effort, supplemented by looking down on others you deem less than.

Just speculation on my part, but it would fit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Caesar
Jul 9, 2009
10,758
2,086
136
last-week-tonight-scotus-1200x670.jpg
She's a vote for Kavanaugh and i'm not disappointed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IJTSSG

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,081
136
Collins: "It appears to be a very thorough investigation"

What a joke!

Damn, media sucks btw. It's always "The Democrats say this, the Republicans say that." They need to call the Republicans out on this sham.

One week. No interviews. No field work: "ITS A VERY THOROUGH INVESTIGATION!!"

Spend a whole year finding criminals working for Trump: "ITS A WITCH HUNT!!"
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,293
32,792
136
Over a year after what he testified about.
So let me get this...

Are you claiming his yearbook is one definition and when his roommate heard him talking the definition "evolved"? Really?

And then then while he was testifying as to the "drinking game" someone tried to "evolve" the definition on Wikipedia?

So we could have this...

Well week 1 it means this
Week 2 it means this
Week 3 it means something else?

You really that good at lying to yourself? A true Baby Trump.
 

JEDI

Lifer
Sep 25, 2001
29,391
2,738
126
hm.. 2 senators (Republican Fluke and that other female republican) still haven't come forward on what their vote will be yet?

so it's 49-49 right now?

and they BOTH need to vote no else kavanaugh is in?
 

BAMAVOO

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
8,087
41
91
One week. No interviews. No field work: "ITS A VERY THOROUGH INVESTIGATION!!"

Spend a whole year finding criminals working for Trump: "ITS A WITCH HUNT!!"
There is your problem. No evidence toward Kav was found. They are trying to find something on Trump, but can't, so they keep digging to nly find more corruption from dems. If they had anything it would have come to light by now. Just suck your thumbs until Trump finishes his second term.
 
  • Like
Reactions: imported_tajmahal

VRAMdemon

Diamond Member
Aug 16, 2012
7,827
10,220
136
Keep an eye on Gamble v United States case coming before the Supreme Court...

In a nutshell, the case above could possibly give the President the power to pardon state crimes. Kavanaugh would be predicted to vote for this. The result would be that Trump could then pardon federal and state crimes and use this newly granted power to try to effectively shut down the Russia prob. This case could result in more executive powers in regards to stronger Presidential pardon. Kavanaugh has a notably strong view of presidential powers.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-gamble-court-case/
 
  • Like
Reactions: imported_tajmahal

momeNt

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2011
9,290
352
126
I assume it has to do with how you were raised, and lingering feelings of inadequacy plaguing an ego that yearns to be more without putting in any effort, supplemented by looking down on others you deem less than.

Just speculation on my part, but it would fit.

I think this is essentially payback for the nuclear option, and Ford and Kavanaugh are just pawns in the game. I'm also a victim here, I don't deserve to be called a piece of shit. You are better than that.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,293
32,792
136
Keep an eye on Gamble v United States case coming before the Supreme Court...

In a nutshell, the case above could possibly give the President the power to pardon state crimes. Kavanaugh would be predicted to vote for this. The result would be that Trump could then pardon federal and state crimes and use this newly granted power to try to effectively shut down the Russia prob. This case could result in more executive powers in regards to stronger Presidential pardon. Kavanaugh has a notably strong view of presidential powers.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-gamble-court-case/
Usually these kind of changes apply to the next President.
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,041
136
Keep an eye on Gamble v United States case coming before the Supreme Court...

In a nutshell, the case above could possibly give the President the power to pardon state crimes. Kavanaugh would be predicted to vote for this. The result would be that Trump could then pardon federal and state crimes and use this newly granted power to try to effectively shut down the Russia prob. This case could result in more executive powers in regards to stronger Presidential pardon. Kavanaugh has a notably strong view of presidential powers.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-gamble-court-case/
He could also pardon Manafort, and Pence could use it to free trump & clan from charges should he be impeached.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,758
2,086
136
So let me get this...

Are you claiming his yearbook is one definition and when his roommate heard him talking the definition "evolved"? Really?

And then then while he was testifying as to the "drinking game" someone tried to "evolve" the definition on Wikipedia?

So we could have this...

Well week 1 it means this
Week 2 it means this
Week 3 it means something else?

You really that good at lying to yourself? A true Baby Trump.
Nope, I don't know, it's a guess. Keep on working to prove that the Bermuda Triangle really means a menage-a-trois.
 

jackstar7

Lifer
Jun 26, 2009
11,679
1,944
126
I'm also a victim here, I don't deserve to be called a piece of shit. You are better than that.
I play to the level of the player, so in your case, I'm playing down.

You up your game, then I'll meet you there and we can talk about things more thoughtfully and perhaps you might shake my certitude about your basically being excrement.

Here's a starter: explain how Kav is a victim? Who victimized him?

Answer key: If your answer isn't himself, then you're not being honest.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,758
2,086
136
Keep an eye on Gamble v United States case coming before the Supreme Court...

In a nutshell, the case above could possibly give the President the power to pardon state crimes. Kavanaugh would be predicted to vote for this. The result would be that Trump could then pardon federal and state crimes and use this newly granted power to try to effectively shut down the Russia prob. This case could result in more executive powers in regards to stronger Presidential pardon. Kavanaugh has a notably strong view of presidential powers.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-gamble-court-case/
How cool is that!
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,566
10,243
136
hm.. 2 senators (Republican Fluke and that other female republican) still haven't come forward on what their vote will be yet?

so it's 49-49 right now?

and they BOTH need to vote no else kavanaugh is in?

Manchin is a confirmed no? I missed that.
 

momeNt

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2011
9,290
352
126
I play to the level of the player, so in your case, I'm playing down.

You up your game, then I'll meet you there and we can talk about things more thoughtfully and perhaps you might shake my certitude about your basically being excrement.

Here's a starter: explain how Kav is a victim? Who victimized him?

Answer key: If your answer isn't himself, then you're not being honest.

I said Ford and Kavanaugh are pawns. I am the victim.
 
  • Like
Reactions: imported_tajmahal
Jul 9, 2009
10,758
2,086
136
  • Like
Reactions: IJTSSG
Jan 25, 2011
17,076
9,554
146
Wow. John Stevens just said that Kavanaugh's performance in the hearing should disqualify him. That's lifelong Republican former Justice John Stevens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jackstar7