• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Kavanaugh SCOTUS Senate Judicial Hearing

Page 126 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Fair points all. 60% is not “almost always” per my original post. It is not “almost always”. It is 60% if the time, and I will let all of you label that frequency by however you see fit. I will say that 60% is not insignificant.

Given the claims against Kavanaugh, at 60% probability, there is a high likelihood of there being at least one victim with injuries sufficient to attract the attention of a parent, school nurse or physician.

So you were pulling facts out of your ass. Thanks for playing. Next.
 
Read the allegation, it's ......it's an allegation.

An allegation reported by a MAN, who beat the shit out of Kavanaugh and Judge when he found them raping his friend. He only recognized them as the perps when he saw their photos on the news.

Could be a case of mistaken identity, but if it’s on a boat they should have witnesses and at least investigate whether Kavanaugh and Judge were even there.
 
As many as they need to come up with until this nominee either fails or is seated. The next ones will start to happen with the next nominee.

Are you willing to bet your anandtech life on that claim? If Kavanagh fails and the next nominee is NOT lambasted with charges of sexual assault or similar claims, will you stop posting on p&n until after the 2020 election?
 
Last edited:
So IF Kavanaugh is confirmed, does SCOTUS/Chief Justice have any authority to refuse to seat him? I’m rusty on my Constitutional law...but I remember the Senate has that power (back from the Roy Moore battle.) Not sure how the other branches are setup.
 
C'mon, Mitch! Taint the SCOTUS with this for the next 30 years. Tell us how it will elevate the Court in the eyes of the People. Show us how much you care about the Constitution & the institutions that serve it.
 
Fair points all. 60% is not “almost always” per my original post. It is not “almost always”. It is 60% if the time, and I will let all of you label that frequency by however you see fit. I will say that 60% is not insignificant.

Given the claims against Kavanaugh, at 60% probability, there is a high likelihood of there being at least one victim with injuries sufficient to attract the attention of a parent, school nurse or physician.

Do you think teenage daughters, who are drinking illegally, typically go to their parents when they are raped? Do you think parents today see their daughters junk in enough detail to come to their own conclusion when their daughter hasn't said anything to them?

I guess those are all possibilities in the mind of a hermit with zero real world experience.
 
An allegation reported by a MAN, who beat the shit out of Kavanaugh and Judge when he found them raping his friend. He only recognized them as the perps when he saw their photos on the news.

Could be a case of mistaken identity, but if it’s on a boat they should have witnesses and at least investigate whether Kavanaugh and Judge were even there.
lol, you guys are getting cute with this kind of claim.
 
Interesring the GOP is now releasing anonymous allegations though. Almost like they want to make them all seem frivolous by comparison.

Edit. Just saw the witness for the Rhode Island accusation on the bot also has calledd for the military over throw of Trump extensively on Twitter. The GOP brought this up extensively in the call involving Kavanaugh.

Yeah. They are trying to taint all accusers.
 
I already set my DVR to record the whole kavanugh hearing. I'll be able to watch the start of it live. This is going to be SO AWESOME. Douchebag rapist conservative judge gets questioned by senators live on TV. It's gonna be brutal!
 
lol, you guys are getting cute with this kind of claim.

“You guys?” I'm reacting to this shit storm in real time. I had my doubts when it was just Ford, and I didn't even think Ramirez's allegation amounted to sexual assault. The game has changed my friend.

Perhaps Democrats will be guilty of the greatest political hit job in history. Not likely. There are serious concerns Republicans are releasing the 4th and 5th allegations to muddy the waters (or try to force Kavanaugh's withdrawal so they can save face and blame Democrats.)

But hey, we're in the post-truth era. Own it. Revel in it. Trump made this shit mainstream.
 
Do you think teenage daughters, who are drinking illegally, typically go to their parents when they are raped? Do you think parents today see their daughters junk in enough detail to come to their own conclusion when their daughter hasn't said anything to them?

I guess those are all possibilities in the mind of a hermit with zero real world experience.
I think there are possibilities and explanations I already covered that you won’t acknowledge because you’re a little waterboy.
 
Back
Top