Kavanaugh SCOTUS Senate Judicial Hearing

[Maxima1]

And now the packed supreme court can annul efforts to redistrict.

Or even outright dismantle the independent panels that draw neutral districts in some states. I don't think Roberts liked this.

 

[K1052]

It does seem like the Democrats should probably add DC and Puerto Rico as states next time they have the ability to do so.

DC and all other (peopled) US territories would probably be considered.

 

[fskimospy]

Good luck getting a 2/3 majority in both houses though.

From my understanding it’s a simple majority for both.

 

[ecogen]

Let's get real here...I'm a "disingenuous prick" in your pea-sized brain because you have no other way to cope with facts that don't happen to reinforce your twisted view of reality. The facts being that those sworn statements did not in any way corroborate Ford's account of what she alleges happened to her. Deal with it.

Signed,
Disingenuous Prick

Post one account from any witness not named Judge or Kavanaugh that say that what Ford alleged did not happen. Just one. Not "I don't know", not "I don't remember" but "did not happen".

I'll be waiting, probably forever cause you got jack shit.

 

[HomerJS]

An investigation seems silly, no true bottom line can be found. One person saying it happened, she's sure it was him that can't say who payed for her polygraph vs. a person with a feckless record and a friend that was at the supposed incident and says he has no recollection of such an event happening. Their isn't something here to investigate, there isn't a smoking gun piece of evidence. This isn't a trial, either. To me this is an obvious smear campaign to delay things.

But, it is interesting to see the Dems today argue for holding an alleged crime as a teenager against someone for all their life even if they've been a productive contributing citizen for decades since...

I say they are holding him responsible for lying about it

 

[Zorba]

I didn't get busted over anything. You're the truly ignorant person here. You have little knowledge of the process, and little knowledge of history. You CLEARLY stated they didn't have subpoena power, the Senate DOES!!! FFS get that through your damn head.

Holy shit you a dumd and dishonest mother fucker. The Senate does, the minority party doesn't dumb shit.

 

[fskimospy]

Why stop there...pack the court too. I'm sure you can find a way to rationalize that as well.

I agree! Court packing should definitely be done as well.

Conservatives aren’t great at understanding long term consequences. When you stopped playing by the rules you invite a response. You may not be happy when you get it but you have no one but yourselves to blame.

 

[ecogen]

Ah, the resident fucking psychopath is coming out of the woodwork.

Oh look he's back. How's your "why didn't the Dems ask for a subpoena" talking point going? Oh wait, it got shot down in flames and then you ran like a bitch without admitting you were wrong.

http://www.talkmedianews.com/suprem...ry-committee-declines-to-subpoena-mark-judge/

 

[snoopy7548]

I sure loved it when the GOP delayed Merrick Garland's nomination for nearly a year. Ahhhh, good times.

Wait, what were you complaining about? Oh right, the dirty democrats delaying Kavanaugh's nomination for a couple more weeks.

 

[fskimospy]

Oh look he's back. How's your "why didn't the Dems ask for a subpoena" talking point going? Oh wait, it got shot down in flames and then you ran like a bitch without admitting you were wrong.

http://www.talkmedianews.com/suprem...ry-committee-declines-to-subpoena-mark-judge/

Remember though, all he wants is an honest debate.

 

[Zstream]

Holy shit you a dumd and dishonest mother fucker. The Senate does, the minority party doesn't dumb shit.

Why didn’t the minority request it once they received the letter? Don’t give me this bullshit about confidentiality, as the fucking process is dedicated and supports whistleblowers you dumbfuck. ANSWER THAT! Don’t reply until you can ANSWER that!

 

[K1052]

Good luck getting a 2/3 majority in both houses though.

New states are admitted with a simple majority.

 

[Jhhnn]

From my understanding it’s a simple majority for both.

You're both wrong. Impeachment requires a simple majority in the HOR. Conviction requires a 2/3 majority in the Senate regardless of the position of the accused.

Invoking the 25th amendment for permanent removal of a sitting president requires a 2/3 majority in both houses.

 

[fskimospy]

You're both wrong. Impeachment requires a simple majority in the HOR. Conviction requires a 2/3 majority in the Senate regardless of the position of the accused.

Invoking the 25th amendment for permanent removal of a sitting president requires a 2/3 majority in both houses.

Uhmm, we are talking about admitting new states, not impeachment.

 

[Maxima1]

I sure loved it when the GOP delayed Merrick Garland's nomination for nearly a year. Ahhhh, good times.

Wait, what were you complaining about? Oh right, the dirty democrats delaying Kavanaugh's nomination for a couple more weeks.

And why would they complain? McConnell suggested to do just that in July.

 

[soundforbjt]

It's a high school nickname for a toot from the 80's.

Then you should have no problem backing up this claim you made with evidence...I'll wait.

 

[ecogen]

Remember though, all he wants is an honest debate.

I'm sure he does. That's why he'll definitely respond to these posts admit his mistake and continue debating in good faiHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

 

[Zstream]

Remember though, all he wants is an honest debate.

You’re a fucking hack, and you still haven’t answered my questions. WHY DIDNT a FBI investigation request happen the moment the letter was RECEIVED!!!!!

Don’t fucking reply till you can answer it.

 

[Jhhnn]

Why didn’t the minority request it once they received the letter? Don’t give me this bullshit about confidentiality, as the fucking process is dedicated and supports whistleblowers you dumbfuck. ANSWER THAT! Don’t reply until you can ANSWER that!

Because Ford chose not to reveal herself until the accusation was leaked w/o her consent. Too easy, obviously.

 

[Zstream]

Because Ford chose not to reveal herself until the accusation was leaked w/o her consent. Too easy, obviously.

LMFAO! Move along

 

[HomerJS]

Why didn’t the minority request it once they received the letter? Don’t give me this bullshit about confidentiality, as the fucking process is dedicated and supports whistleblowers you dumbfuck. ANSWER THAT! Don’t reply until you can ANSWER that!

I believe Ford explained that. The information was not Feinstein's to share. You really should be shouting at the victim.

Riddle me this, what would have changed if the letter had been revealed one month earlier. The arguments would have been the same. It would have been, Ford is a liar and a Democratic conspiracy.

 

[fskimospy]

You’re a fucking hack, and you still haven’t answered my questions. WHY DIDNT a FBI investigation request happen the moment the letter was RECEIVED!!!!!

Don’t fucking reply till you can answer it.

This has already been answered repeatedly.

Instead of ranting and foaming why don’t you simply admit you were wrong in the earlier discussion? You claimed you wanted an honest debate. Well, honest debate means admitting when you’re wrong.

 

[ecogen]

You’re a fucking hack, and you still haven’t answered my questions. WHY DIDNT a FBI investigation request happen the moment the letter was RECEIVED!!!!!

Don’t fucking reply till you can answer it.

When you gonna admit to being wrong about the Dems not asking for a subpoena?

 

[Zstream]

I believe Ford explained that. The information was not Feinstein's to share. You really should be shouting at the victim.

0 for 2 - When is the third coming?

 

[Zstream]

This has already been answered repeatedly.

Instead of ranting and foaming why don’t you simply admit you were wrong in the earlier discussion? You claimed you wanted an honest debate. Well, honest debate means admitting when you’re wrong.

0 for 3 - keep it coming