Karl Rove lies about Elizabeth Warren in attack ads

[Bowfinger]

Like she was lying about her "heritage" to get the job?

Hack, hack, hack. From your Boston Herald link:

Harvard Law professor Charles Fried, a former U.S. Solicitor General who served under Ronald Reagan, sat on the appointing committee that recommended Warren for hire in 1995. He said he didn’t recall her Native American heritage ever coming up during the hiring process.

“It simply played no role in the appointments process. It was not mentioned and I didn’t mention it to the faculty,” he said.

You're pathetic, so full of hatred. Get help.

 

[Jhhnn]

Two ads, one claiming she's an anti-business, anti-banking leftist radical associated with the OWS movement, and a second, claiming that she's in the back pocket of Wall Street. At least one has to be false.

You don't understand- the second ad wipes out the first one, the same way that a diet pepsi cancels out the effects of a triple hamburger with fries.

 

[monovillage]

Hack, hack, hack. From your Boston Herald link:

You're pathetic, so full of hatred. Get help.

"I don't recall" ? Lol, you didn't read the other article where she admitted listing herself as Native American. You are so fucking pathetic and full of hatred. Get some help.

Democratic Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren, fending off questions about whether she used her Native American heritage to advance her career, said today she enrolled herself as a minority in law school directories for nearly a decade because she hoped to meet other people with tribal roots.

 

[Jhhnn]

"I don't recall" ? Lol, you didn't read the other article where she admitted listing herself as Native American. You are so fucking pathetic and full of hatred. Get some help.

And that has precisely what to do with her being both a radical anti-bank leftist & a tool of Wall St?

Apparently, the threat of cognitive dissonance means you must duh-vert... change the subject.

 

[monovillage]

And that has precisely what to do with her being both a radical anti-bank leftist & a tool of Wall St?

Apparently, the threat of cognitive dissonance means you must duh-vert... change the subject.

You're the one diverting, she lied about her heritage to get a job. The University touted her as a Native American professor. If she was a Republican you'd be going into a paroxysm of outrage, but since she's a Democrat you leap to her defense. It's fun watching you liberal/Democrats scurrying for cover.

 

[Doc Savage Fan]

Liberal Faux Outrage #9,723

 

[Jhhnn]

You're the one diverting, she lied about her heritage to get a job. The University touted her as a Native American professor. If she was a Republican you'd be going into a paroxysm of outrage, but since she's a Democrat you leap to her defense. It's fun watching you liberal/Democrats scurrying for cover.

Read the thread title & the OP. Then copy/paste it into a reply, explain how claims wrt her Native American ancestry relate to that. They don't.

I suspect that your level of self awareness is so low that you don't even realize what you're doing. When somebody waves a red flag, you charge, throw all you've got into the effort.

"She's a liar too!" isn't an argument, but rather a diversion.

 

[monovillage]

Read the thread title & the OP. Then copy/paste it into a reply, explain how claims wrt her Native American ancestry relate to that. They don't.

I suspect that your level of self awareness is so low that you don't even realize what you're doing. When somebody waves a red flag, you charge, throw all you've got into the effort.

"She's a liar too!" isn't an argument, but rather a diversion.

I deliberately resurrected the thread just so I could see the usual suspects that had posted in the earlier thread suddenly switch directions and start defending an obvious liar like Warren. You're the idiot if you don't understand my intent on this honesty posting, Rove didn't lie, he is playing politics. It's what he is hired to do.

 

[Bowfinger]

"I don't recall" ? Lol, you didn't read the other article where she admitted listing herself as Native American. You are so fucking pathetic and full of hatred. Get some help.

Can you even read?

she enrolled herself as a minority in law school directories for nearly a decade because she hoped to meet other people with tribal roots.

It had nothing to do with employment. Nothing. Nada. Zilch. She believed she had Native American ancestry and wanted to meet others to learn more.

 

[monovillage]

Can you even read?

It had nothing to do with employment. Nothing. Nada. Zilch. She believed she had Native American ancestry and wanted to meet others to learn more.

Wow, I know you're not that stupid, so you must be desperate.

Out to lunch is right.

 

[PokerGuy]

The dimlib camp is trying to spin spin spin, but the fact is Fauxcahontas pretended to be of native american ancestry at harvard. She lied. Just another typical politician.

If you are naive enough to buy the whole "I just wanted to meet others with native american ancestry" BS, I have some oceanfront property to sell you in Nebraska.

 

[jackstar7]

We know she's not Native American... she's Kenyan, right guys?

 

[Craig234]

Here's her Indian Ancestry in graphical form. She's 1/32 Native American.

http://thevimh.blogspot.com/2012/05/what-does-132nd-look-like.html]What Does 1/32nd Look Like?

She's a 1 percenter too.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/mil... a Wealthy Individual Who Owns a Lot of Stock

Here's the thing: what right do you have to criticize her for being wealthy?

You don't complain about it in other candidates, so it makes you hypocrite.

What matters are her policies.

That's why JFK is not opposed by the left for his wealth, while a Mitt Romeny who is wealthy but wants extreme transfer of wealth from you to him is.

 

[Craig234]

I was concerned when I heard this story that she might have done something wrong.

It didn't change her policies, but might be a character issue.

Now it sounds like it's a non-issue (other than her 1/32 Native American making her the only tenured 'minority' Harvard professor one year, it was reported).

Big surprise: the right is lying again at this point.

 

[Jhhnn]

I deliberately resurrected the thread just so I could see the usual suspects that had posted in the earlier thread suddenly switch directions and start defending an obvious liar like Warren. You're the idiot if you don't understand my intent on this honesty posting, Rove didn't lie, he is playing politics. It's what he is hired to do.

So, uhh, you resurrected this thread so you could duh-vert from the subject of it?

If you want to talk about Warren's native american ancestry or lack thereof & how she may or may not have claimed it to her advantage, Then you need to do so in a thread somewhat more than tangentially related.

Neither of Rove's attack ads mentioned that at all, did they? Why do you even bring it up? Do those ads contradict each other, or not?

Or does any of that matter in your fervent desire to discredit Warren?

Or is she an anti-bank leftist tool of Wall St because she has native american ancestry?

Get a clue.

 

[PokerGuy]

Big surprise: the right is lying again at this point.

No, it's not "the right" that is lying:

Christopher Child, a genealogist at the New England Historic and Genealogical Society, traced back Warren’s family to her great-grandfather on her mother’s side and couldn’t find any proof of Native American heritage.

Fauxcahantas lied and got caught. Duhvert and duhflect and blaming 'the right" for her lies won't fly.

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

Because Republicans are lying to keep Brown in office.

Like the dems did about Romney in mass.

Partisans lie.

 

[monovillage]

So, uhh, you resurrected this thread so you could duh-vert from the subject of it?

If you want to talk about Warren's native american ancestry or lack thereof & how she may or may not have claimed it to her advantage, Then you need to do so in a thread somewhat more than tangentially related.

Neither of Rove's attack ads mentioned that at all, did they? Why do you even bring it up? Do those ads contradict each other, or not?

Or does any of that matter in your fervent desire to discredit Warren?

Or is she an anti-bank leftist tool of Wall St because she has native american ancestry?

Get a clue.

You are such a partisan clown on this issue it almost hurts to see you wiggle and squirm. Rove didn't lie, craig the partisan hack didn't even post a link in the OP that he had.
Warren lied about her heritage to earn special liberal points for being a native American and secure a job and Harvard used her lies to get special liberal points for hiring a native American.
All the liberals got all outraged about the non-lie that Rove told, but are perfectly happy with the lies that Warren told.
Who's the liar? Elizabeth Warren is the liar.
Rove is not the liar.
You are trying to divert from the fact that Warren is the liar, not Rove, but I'll be happy to start a new Elizabeth Warren is a liar thread if you ask me to.

 

[monovillage]

I was concerned when I heard this story that she might have done something wrong.

It didn't change her policies, but might be a character issue.

Now it sounds like it's a non-issue (other than her 1/32 Native American making her the only tenured 'minority' Harvard professor one year, it was reported).

Big surprise: the right is lying again at this point.

Big surprise, Craig234 is lying yet again on this point........ Elizabeth Warren lied.

 

[Craig234]

So, uhh, you resurrected this thread so you could duh-vert from the subject of it?

I'm glad he did.

It shows the pattern of lying about Warren. It's all about the money.

 

[Bowfinger]

Big surprise, Craig234 is lying yet again on this point........ Elizabeth Warren lied.

Prove it. Provide factual and credible evidence that Warren knew she had so little Native American ancestry. Prove that Warren knowingly attempted to gain any personal advantage from it. The bottom line is you're a bitter hack, butt-hurt because one of your idols was caught in yet another lie, so you compulsively lashed out with whatever counterattack you could come up with, no matter how dishonest and absurd it might be.

If you want to criticize Harvard for dishonesty, go for it. You've presented evidence that supports such criticism. You've FAILED to present such evidence for Warren, however. Maybe she is as dishonest as you insist. Prove it. Put up or shut up. Back your talking points with actual evidence.

 

[Bowfinger]

Wow, I know you're not that stupid, so you must be desperate.

Out to lunch is right.

Just noting for the record you offered not a single iota of substance to support your position or justify your personal attack. Just more pointless screeching. GG.

 

[monovillage]

I'm glad he did.

It shows the pattern of lying about Warren. It's all about the money.

You never showed where Rove lied about Warren. Now it can be shown that Warren lied about her heritage to gain financial and political advantage and you Democrats are cool with her lies. Hypocrite city.

 

[monovillage]

Just noting for the record you offered not a single iota of substance to support your position or justify your personal attack. Just more pointless screeching. GG.

What personal attack? You are desperate? It's obvious.

 

[xBiffx]

Prove it. Provide factual and credible evidence that Warren knew she had so little Native American ancestry. Prove that Warren knowingly attempted to gain any personal advantage from it. The bottom line is you're a bitter hack, butt-hurt because one of your idols was caught in yet another lie, so you compulsively lashed out with whatever counterattack you could come up with, no matter how dishonest and absurd it might be.

If you want to criticize Harvard for dishonesty, go for it. You've presented evidence that supports such criticism. You've FAILED to present such evidence for Warren, however. Maybe she is as dishonest as you insist. Prove it. Put up or shut up. Back your talking points with actual evidence.

Warren, AKA Spreading Bull:

“Being Native American has been part of my story I guess since the day I was born,” said Warren, who never mentioned her Native American heritage on the campaign trail even as she detailed much of her personal history to voters in speeches, statements and a video. “These are my family stories, I have lived in a family that has talked about Native American and talked about tribes since I was a little girl.”

Why is it that we never hear anything about this all so important heritage until Scott Brown brings up Harvard as an issue. If this was such an important part of her life, why no mention of it until now? Never was it mentioned previously on the campaign trail. Something smells here.