• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Kansas votes for Intelligent Design

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
my state is full of retards

And the retards in your state vote, apparently.
It was the Kansas School Board who voted for this, not the public in general. Last time the school board did this (6 years ago), the Kansas voters voted them out of office and the old standards were brought back. Come next year's school board election, I'm sure you'll see more of the same.
 
Now, when they teach intelligent design in the classroom, are they limited to a Christian divine being? I think that, as long as they are going to teach the kids intelligent design, they ought to also introduce the possibility that some other supreme being or beings is responsible. Greek gods anyone? 😀
 
I dont have much a problem with teaching creationism, ID or anything else right alongside evolution.

My preference would be....
explain the difference between biogenesis and evolution and teach it as such.
secondly, teach Creation, ID, whatever you want in a mandatory philosophy/religious studies class.

I dont think this is such a big deal as you guys make it out to be. Just another chance to bash the religious. The job of the education system is to teach people how to think for themselves and solve problems.... not what to believe is correct.
 
Why is it such a hard thing to teach both and let the children decide which they believe.
 
Originally posted by: aphex
Why is it such a hard thing to teach both and let the children decide which they believe.

Because schools shouldn't be involved with religion.
 
Originally posted by: aphex
Why is it such a hard thing to teach both and let the children decide which they believe.

This isn't a problem...if ID and the like were taught OUTSIDE of a science class. In order to get ID being taught in science classes, Kansas went around to changing the definition of science. This definition makes science lose much of its rigor, as it allows for virtually anything to be an explanation of natural phenomena.

Just because a majority want something taught doesn't mean it's correct.
 
They shouldn't be teaching ID or Darwinism. Creationism belongs in the home and at church, not at school. Darwinism can't be proven so it doesn't belong there either.
 
Originally posted by: Thera
Originally posted by: aphex
Why is it such a hard thing to teach both and let the children decide which they believe.

Because schools shouldn't be involved with religion.
We'll let the voters in the school district decide that, thanks

Besides, these schools are being openminded and inclusive. Isn't that wonderful?!!? 🙂
Everyone will appreciate it.
 
Originally posted by: Ilmater
Kansas votes for Intelligent Design[/L].

Did you RTFA?
The new standards contain an explicit disclaimer saying they're not designed to promote intelligent design

Maybe you should work on the reading comprehension before you go spouting off?!?

This is a tough issue, and one that's not going to have a solution that makes everyone happy.

Yes, I live in Kansas, and I disagree with part of their decision, and agree with others.
 
Originally posted by: sixone
Originally posted by: Ilmater
Kansas votes for Intelligent Design[/L].

Did you RTFA?
The new standards contain an explicit disclaimer saying they're not designed to promote intelligent design

Maybe you should work on the reading comprehension before you go spouting off?!?

This is a tough issue, and one that's not going to have a solution that makes everyone happy.

Yes, I live in Kansas, and I disagree with part of their decision, and agree with others.


that's like the "warning" the put on dildo boxes that say's its a novelty only, and not for using as a marital aid. CYA.
 
Originally posted by: Howard
the changes would make teaching about evolution more balanced and expose studels teach science.
What?

Given the context of the article, I found that really funny. I think perhaps they meant to type "strudels," not "studels."
 
Originally posted by: broon
They shouldn't be teaching ID or Darwinism. Creationism belongs in the home and at church, not at school. Darwinism can't be proven so it doesn't belong there either.


idiots like that is what allows this kind of nonsense to happen :roll:

 
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: broon
They shouldn't be teaching ID or Darwinism. Creationism belongs in the home and at church, not at school. Darwinism can't be proven so it doesn't belong there either.


idiots like that is what allows this kind of nonsense to happen :roll:


Im a mathematician by nature, not a scientist... so following the rules of proofs...

Nothing can ever be proven true... only false. You only prove false by counterexample.
So technically he is correct. Darwinism cannot ever be proven true, but it will stand until it is eventually (possibly) proven false.

 
Originally posted by: sao123
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: broon
They shouldn't be teaching ID or Darwinism. Creationism belongs in the home and at church, not at school. Darwinism can't be proven so it doesn't belong there either.


idiots like that is what allows this kind of nonsense to happen :roll:


Im a mathematician by nature, not a scientist... so following the rules of proofs...

Nothing can ever be proven true... only false. You only prove false by counterexample.
So technically he is correct. Darwinism cannot ever be proven true, but it will stand until it is eventually (possibly) proven false.


so if you can't prove God exists, he will eventually be proven not to exist?
 
Back
Top