"Fair enough, you stick to your life of unbending tedium, don't jaywalk, don't do anything that you're not 'supposed' to do. But don't try and compare me to a car-thief or a bank-robber, because i'll just laugh in your face, as will the rest of the normal people who do the same as me."
I don't think I've compared you to anybody, that comparison involving your own behavior is something you've done inside your self.
I am talking about concepts that a person has of what is right or wrong, and the difference between doing something that one thinks is wrong and admitting it's wrong, and doing something that one thinks is wrong and then rationalizing and deciding it isn't wrong anymore.
I'm arguing against rationalization, not claiming to be a model citizen. Because I think rationalization is like lieing to oneself, which is unhealthy.
edit- and my questions about the car was an attempt to use an example of what most would consider a greater wrong that couldn't be as easily rationalized, to get people to look at the process of how thay have decided that piracy is ok.