Originally posted by: KLin
put the blunt away please.
or was it RobCur?Originally posted by: Evadman
Did Wduaqnug take over your account?
Originally posted by: Chompman
wtf is a strongers?
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
Jesus, I am getting tired of the OP.
Originally posted by: DaWhim
Originally posted by: Chompman
wtf is a strongers?
never read any classics like The Republic?
Originally posted by: Evadman
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
Jesus, I am getting tired of the OP.
Ordnance Pamphlet?
Oxidative Phosphorylation?
Operating Procedure?
Opportunities Page?
Oral Production?
Orthographic Projection?
Osteoporosis?
First we need to define "strongers".Originally posted by: Kibbo
This is actually the essence of Positivist jurisprudence, most elegantly put forth by Austin.
In his argument, law is any rule passed down by the sovereign.
And the sovereign is defined as any agent who can impose santions (threat of force) on any other person in a given political unit, without anyone having the ability to impose sanctions on "him."
Essentially, he who has the biggest sword makes the laws, and the law is whatever he who has the biggest sword says it is.
Originally posted by: Kibbo
This is actually the essence of Positivist jurisprudence, most elegantly put forth by Austin.
In his argument, law is any rule passed down by the sovereign.
And the sovereign is defined as any agent who can impose santions (threat of force) on any other person in a given political unit, without anyone having the ability to impose sanctions on "him."
Essentially, he who has the biggest sword makes the laws, and the law is whatever he who has the biggest sword says it is.
Originally posted by: DaWhim
Originally posted by: Kibbo
This is actually the essence of Positivist jurisprudence, most elegantly put forth by Austin.
In his argument, law is any rule passed down by the sovereign.
And the sovereign is defined as any agent who can impose santions (threat of force) on any other person in a given political unit, without anyone having the ability to impose sanctions on "him."
Essentially, he who has the biggest sword makes the laws, and the law is whatever he who has the biggest sword says it is.
actually, the quote is from a pre-socratic guy name Thrasymachus.
it is "stronger," not "strongers. I thought there was a "s" there. 😱
So you totally missed the point of this reply? 😉Originally posted by: DaWhim
Originally posted by: Chompman
wtf is a strongers?
never read any classics like The Republic?