Just ordered a Panasonic LX7

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
After a few months I'm disappointed with this camera. I've noticed that there is a lot of distortion, although that might be inevitable with the wide angle. But also, it takes FOREVER to turn on. I keep it in my car but I usually miss the shot when I see something cool and grab it, because it takes several seconds to turn on. It also takes a long time to turn off.

Now it won't take pictures at all. It acts like there's no memory card in it.
 

CuriousMike

Diamond Member
Feb 22, 2001
3,044
544
136
I agree that it's slow to turn on and it takes a long time to turn off ( particularly if there are photos in the buffer to write. If you can stomach JPG only, that helps. )

However, I've not been so picky with noticing the distortion at wide-angle ( which I use a lot). I wonder if LR is correcting it automagically for me?
 

Syborg1211

Diamond Member
Jul 29, 2000
3,297
26
91
Throck - I know some cameras benefit from disabling the startup image if possible. That should shave at least a second off your start time. You leave your camera in your car in the Houston heat? If so, I'm not at all surprised the camera is breaking down.

Mike - All fixed lens cams do lens correction in camera, even on the raw. Lightroom shouldn't have a lens correction profile for any p&s.
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
Throck - I know some cameras benefit from disabling the startup image if possible. That should shave at least a second off your start time. You leave your camera in your car in the Houston heat? If so, I'm not at all surprised the camera is breaking down.

Mike - All fixed lens cams do lens correction in camera, even on the raw. Lightroom shouldn't have a lens correction profile for any p&s.

It wasn't hot until recently
 

cheez

Golden Member
Nov 19, 2010
1,722
69
91
Sorry for bringing old thread alive again.

1). Does LX7 allow you to set ISO and aperture setting before start recording video?

2). Can you zoom in / out while recording video?

3). Can it "pause" recording and resume? This is probably the most critical feature I acquire. My current junk (Fujifilm FinePix F30) isn't worth a dang...

thanks,

cheez
 
Last edited:

CuriousMike

Diamond Member
Feb 22, 2001
3,044
544
136
Aww man that sucks.

Thanks

Order the camera already though.

thanks,

cheez

On the bright side, it does take nice, sharp photos.
P1020351.jpg
 

cheez

Golden Member
Nov 19, 2010
1,722
69
91
On the bright side, it does take nice, sharp photos.
P1020351.jpg
Wow.... that does look good. :eek::eek:

I'm sold... glad I ordered the camera. Once I receive it I will be taking pics and vids of my new power cable! heeheeheeheehee :D so excited. My current Fujifilm is terrible at close shots and has worst video.


thanks,

cheez
 
Last edited:

cheez

Golden Member
Nov 19, 2010
1,722
69
91
I got the camera. It's real nice. It takes low light room with ease in video recording. And it does focus objects quickly too. I really like this "Auto Focus Macro"

Question: What does this mean?

"
If [Rec Quality] of [AVCHD] motion pictures is set to [PSH] or
[FSH], you can continuously record a motion picture for up to
29
minutes 59 seconds"


What is PSH and FSH in AVCHD setting? What is the difference between the two? is the first one "progressive" and the latter "interlaced"?


thanks,


cheez
 

cheez

Golden Member
Nov 19, 2010
1,722
69
91
Nevermind I found what those mean on internet. The manual that came with the camera didn't have much info other than basic use of the camera.


HD Video: 1,920 x 1,080 pixels [NTSC Model]
AVCHD 60p (PSH: 28Mbps) (Sensor output is 60fps)
AVCHD 60i (FSH: 17Mbps) (Sensor output is 60fps)
MP4, 30fps (FHD: 20Mbps) (Sensor output is 30fps)
[PAL Model]
AVCHD 50p (PSH: 28Mbps) (Sensor output is 50fps)
AVCHD 50i (FSH: 17Mbps) (Sensor output is 50fps)
MP4, 25fps (FHD: 20Mbps) (Sensor output is 25fps) 1,280 x 720 pixels [NTSC Model]
AVCHD 60p (SH: 17Mbps) (Sensor output is 60fps)
MP4, 30fps (HD: 10Mbps) (Sensor output is 30fps)
[PAL Model]
AVCHD 50p (SH: 17Mbps) (Sensor output is 50fps)
MP4, 25fps (HD: 10Mbps) (Sensor output is 25fps) STD Video: 640 x 480 pixels [NTSC Model]
MP4, 30fps (VGA: 4Mbps)
[PAL Model]
MP4, 25fps (VGA: 4Mbps) High Speed Video: 1,280 x 720 pixels [NTSC Model]
MP4, 30fps (Sensor output is 120fps)
[PAL Model]
MP4, 25fps (Sensor output is 100fps) (Max. of approx. 4 GB of continuous motion picture can be recorded in MP4. In AVCHD, recording may be continued until the card is full.)



Question to you guys. Which setting in the video recording looked better to you? MPEG4 or AVCHD? I'm asking in respect to video quality.


P.s. I took a few videos in HD (it wasn't FSH) and posted on youtube. Search "Unreal Power 5M Ultra music test 2".

thanks,

cheez
 
Last edited:

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
Nevermind I found what those mean on internet. The manual that came with the camera didn't have much info other than basic use of the camera.


HD Video: 1,920 x 1,080 pixels [NTSC Model]
AVCHD 60p (PSH: 28Mbps) (Sensor output is 60fps)
AVCHD 60i (FSH: 17Mbps) (Sensor output is 60fps)
MP4, 30fps (FHD: 20Mbps) (Sensor output is 30fps)
[PAL Model]
AVCHD 50p (PSH: 28Mbps) (Sensor output is 50fps)
AVCHD 50i (FSH: 17Mbps) (Sensor output is 50fps)
MP4, 25fps (FHD: 20Mbps) (Sensor output is 25fps) 1,280 x 720 pixels [NTSC Model]
AVCHD 60p (SH: 17Mbps) (Sensor output is 60fps)
MP4, 30fps (HD: 10Mbps) (Sensor output is 30fps)
[PAL Model]
AVCHD 50p (SH: 17Mbps) (Sensor output is 50fps)
MP4, 25fps (HD: 10Mbps) (Sensor output is 25fps) STD Video: 640 x 480 pixels [NTSC Model]
MP4, 30fps (VGA: 4Mbps)
[PAL Model]
MP4, 25fps (VGA: 4Mbps) High Speed Video: 1,280 x 720 pixels [NTSC Model]
MP4, 30fps (Sensor output is 120fps)
[PAL Model]
MP4, 25fps (Sensor output is 100fps) (Max. of approx. 4 GB of continuous motion picture can be recorded in MP4. In AVCHD, recording may be continued until the card is full.)



Question to you guys. Which setting in the video recording looked better to you? MPEG4 or AVCHD? I'm asking in respect to video quality.


P.s. I took a few videos in HD (it wasn't FSH) and posted on youtube. Search "Unreal Power 5M Ultra music test 2".

thanks,

cheez

Wait, how do you record high speed video?
 

cheez

Golden Member
Nov 19, 2010
1,722
69
91
After a few months I'm disappointed with this camera. I've noticed that there is a lot of distortion, although that might be inevitable with the wide angle. But also, it takes FOREVER to turn on. I keep it in my car but I usually miss the shot when I see something cool and grab it, because it takes several seconds to turn on. It also takes a long time to turn off.

Now it won't take pictures at all. It acts like there's no memory card in it.
Now you've got me a little concerned. Can you tell me more about the "distortion" with the camera? Are the images look distorted after taking pics? can you describe more in detail for me pls?


thanks!

cheez
 

fralexandr

Platinum Member
Apr 26, 2007
2,279
222
106
www.flickr.com
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx7/7
In the image grid near the bottom, you can see some barrel/mustache distortion in the distortion sample. It's noticeable, but not too bad.
*If you're having trouble spotting it, the distortion/curve is most noticeable when comparing the grid lines to the 4 edges of the photo.*

Distortion tends to happen on wider lenses. JPEG files from the camera probably have some processing to reduce distortion, so it's usually more noticeable when shooting RAW.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrel_distortion
 
Last edited:

cheez

Golden Member
Nov 19, 2010
1,722
69
91
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx7/7
In the image grid near the bottom, you can see some barrel/mustache distortion in the distortion sample. It's noticeable, but not too bad.
*If you're having trouble spotting it, the distortion/curve is most noticeable when comparing the grid lines to the 4 edges of the photo.*

Distortion tends to happen on wider lenses. JPEG files from the camera probably have some processing to reduce distortion, so it's usually more noticeable when shooting RAW.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrel_distortion

This one here? Oh I see the curve towards the edge.

distortion.jpg


Oh that's not bad at all. I thought OP was talking about something else, i.e. graphical artifacts / dirt or something in pics.


thanks,

cheez
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
This one here? Oh I see the curve towards the edge.

distortion.jpg


Oh that's not bad at all. I thought OP was talking about something else, i.e. graphical artifacts / dirt or something in pics.


thanks,

cheez


The distortion is much worse than what that shows. If you take a picture at wide angle of a person, their legs appear really short, similar to cell phone pictures. The further from the center and from the camera the more compression there is. Maybe that's unavoidable with wide angle lenses.
 

fralexandr

Platinum Member
Apr 26, 2007
2,279
222
106
www.flickr.com
The distortion is much worse than what that shows. If you take a picture at wide angle of a person, their legs appear really short, similar to cell phone pictures. The further from the center and from the camera the more compression there is. Maybe that's unavoidable with wide angle lenses.

Are you talking about perspective?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perspective_distortion_(photography)
That's just physics with how lenses work. There's a reason why many studio photographers use 50mm/85mm as seen above. People like equating 50mm full frame to natural human vision (excluding peripheral vision).

http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/cameras-vs-human-eye.htm
 
Last edited: