Originally posted by: BTRY B 529th FA BN
get
this guys board for 100$ shipped and you are good with that quad up to about 525fsb - mine yawns at 500fsb
OP, getting a $100 motherboard and a $170 Q9550 makes no sense. You can get a Core i5 system for that and just add an extra $80 for DDR3 1600 which you can reuse down the line.
Tell him to sell his old parts and just get the Core i5 system. He should be able to get $80 for his mobo + ram + cpu. That's what I did when I upgraded to a Core i7, which made the upgrade really cheap. At first I contemplated dropping the E0 Q9550 into my
P35-DS3L revision 1, but I didn't. Here is why:
At 6x multiplier, my Q6600 G0 needed
FSB +0.1, MCH +0.1 to get to 410 FSB
FSB + 0.2, MCH + 0.2 to get to 425 FSB
FSB + 0.3, MCH + 0.3 to get to 438 FSB
I can't find the link to the Anandtech article, but I recall that FSB temination voltage above 1.40V brings a quick death to 45nm Intel CPUs. Therefore, on the DS3L you are looking at FSB +0.2V at most and 425FSB. Conservatively speaking 400FSB should be doable, with 410-415 within your grasp. After that it's a crapshoot on my DS3L board.
Also check out my Resident Evil 5 results of Q6600 @ 3.4ghz vs. Core i7 860 stock
Q6600 @ 3.4ghz + 4890 880/4000 factory clocks
1280x1024 4AA = 60.8
1680x1050 0AA = 57.8
1680x1050 4AA = 57.8
1920x1080 0AA = 54.6
1920x1080 4AA = 55.1
^^^^ Core 2 Quad CPU limited @ 3.4ghz on 4890 in this game :brokenheart: In fairness, the extra 4mb of cache on the Q9550 and improved architecture should probably let you break into 65-70fps.
Core i7 860 stock w/Turbo enabled, DDR3 1066 CL7 timings + 4890 880/4000
1280x1024 4AA = 106.5 (+75%)
1680x1050 0AA = 97.2 (+68%)
1680x1050 4AA = 90.3 (+56%)
1920x1080 0AA = 88.8 (+63%)
1920x1080 4AA = 81.6 (+49%)
1920x1080 8AA = 77.3
If you can spend the extra $80, the core i5 system is worth it imo.
Also don't forget 920 D0 for $200 at microcenter.