Oh well,
Thought the interview went well. But the committee members said I didn't have enough curiosity and background... Coming from an engineering (BME) background into biological sciences. I asked many questions, read up on research that the interviewers were conducting, and had a lot of lab tech skills (run own lab). Only stumbling block was one guy who I've met before grill me on technical details (promoter used on a transgenic mouse model) in a project that I wasn't even responsible for.
Very very depressing.
Really liked that school. oh well 2 down, waiting on 1 more school to go won't know until 2 weeks from now.
update: depression -> disbelief;
Update: found out I was rejected because I couldn't answer 3 questions. Three questions which even my immediate supervisor (PHD) could not answer. One concerned the paper I was collecting data for that had not been published and more data was needed. They wanted to know the results for it which I could not provide so I told them results were pending. For that I am judged with a lack of curiosity, rationale, and lack of questioning, and I should've read the background papers. There were no background papers to read because nothing had been published yet. Was I unfairly judged?
Thought the interview went well. But the committee members said I didn't have enough curiosity and background... Coming from an engineering (BME) background into biological sciences. I asked many questions, read up on research that the interviewers were conducting, and had a lot of lab tech skills (run own lab). Only stumbling block was one guy who I've met before grill me on technical details (promoter used on a transgenic mouse model) in a project that I wasn't even responsible for.
Very very depressing.
update: depression -> disbelief;
Update: found out I was rejected because I couldn't answer 3 questions. Three questions which even my immediate supervisor (PHD) could not answer. One concerned the paper I was collecting data for that had not been published and more data was needed. They wanted to know the results for it which I could not provide so I told them results were pending. For that I am judged with a lack of curiosity, rationale, and lack of questioning, and I should've read the background papers. There were no background papers to read because nothing had been published yet. Was I unfairly judged?
