Just Four Lawmakers Show Up To Congressional Hearing On Long-Term Unemployment

Status
Not open for further replies.

Oldgamer

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,280
1
0
Because they think the unemployment problem is so important, they didn't show up..

JEChearing.jpg


With the nation’s unemployment rate at 7.6 percent, members of Congress are fond of saying that they are focused on nothing but jobs. And yet, when Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D) scheduled a Joint Economic Committee hearing on one of the biggest jobs-related crises facing the United States, just four of the committee’s 20 members bothered to show up.
When Klobuchar’s hearing on long-term unemployment began at 10:30 Wednesday morning, she was the only member in attendance. She was later joined by three other members, though not a single one of the committee’s 10 Republican members managed to attend, as National Journal’s Niraj Chokshi reports:

The Joint Economic Commitee is one of a handful of committees whose members come from both parties and both houses of Congress. Klobuchar was eventually joined by three colleagues (in order of their appearance): Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy, Maryland Rep. John Delaney and Maryland Rep. Elijah Cummings. All four are Democrats.

As Chokshi noted, it’s not uncommon for lawmakers to be absent at the beginning of hearings, and there were 25 others going on simultaneously at the time. But perhaps the poor attendance at a hearing dealing with unemployment shouldn’t be a surprise, given the general lack of focus from members of Congress on unemployment since the end of the recession. Instead, Congress has focused on debt and deficits, cutting spending even when evidence shows that the opposite needs to be done to grow the economy and create jobs.

There are currently 4.7 million American workers who have been unemployed for at least six months, and the challenges they face are immense. Not only do they long-term unemployed face discriminatory hiring policies that make it nearly impossible for them to find work, they are also losing federal unemployment insurance thanks to state-level cuts and sequestration, which slashed 10 percent from federal benefits.

Unfortunately, even if they had attended, it’s unlikely members of Congress would have gotten the complete picture of unemployment they needed. All four of the panelists invited to speak were white men, the least likely to be affected by the long-term unemployment crisis. A report that accompanied the hearing, in fact, noted that even as long-term unemployment rates have fallen for blacks and Latinos, “progress has been slower than for other racial and ethnic groups.

Link to article
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
My take on this situation is, do I believe this hearing would have had any positive effect, even if minute, for me in my life if everyone attended? No.

I notice the article doesn't provide any of the information supplied by the people who showed up to the hearing.
 
Last edited:

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
Maybe you should consider that Klobuchar called for a hearing so devoid of content and panelists so insipid that even most of her own party thought it was a waste of time and didn't bother showing up.
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
Maybe you should consider that Klobuchar called for a hearing so devoid of content and panelists so insipid that even most of her own party thought it was a waste of time and didn't bother showing up.

Coming from Think Progress it is most likely an attack piece on Republicans, but this one could actually go both ways. You can say congress is not focused on employment, but is it for Republicans not showing up, or Democrats inviting worthless people? Don't know. Need more information before forming a conclusion.
 

thraashman

Lifer
Apr 10, 2000
11,112
1,587
126
Coming from Think Progress it is most likely an attack piece on Republicans, but this one could actually go both ways. You can say congress is not focused on employment, but is it for Republicans not showing up, or Democrats inviting worthless people? Don't know. Need more information before forming a conclusion.

Well if Republicans didn't care for the subject matter then perhaps they could show up and voice their opinion of other routes. For all the clamoring Republicans in the House do about claiming they keep passing jobs bills, they sure aren't trying to work on anything.

Also if you actually read the jobs bills Republicans in the House claim to have passed, the only one that would actually create jobs would do it for non-citizens here on visas.

The Democrats that didn't show up don't get a pass on this either. Assuming the 20 member panel is evenly split, 40% is a piss poor showing.
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
Well if Republicans didn't care for the subject matter then perhaps they could show up and voice their opinion of other routes. For all the clamoring Republicans in the House do about claiming they keep passing jobs bills, they sure aren't trying to work on anything.

Also if you actually read the jobs bills Republicans in the House claim to have passed, the only one that would actually create jobs would do it for non-citizens here on visas.

The Democrats that didn't show up don't get a pass on this either. Assuming the 20 member panel is evenly split, 40% is a piss poor showing.

You know what would be a fantastic idea? Ask those who did not show up, why they did not show up!

How about I blame Think Progress for failing in journalism not supplying useful information? This clearly proves Think Progress does not take the unemployment situation seriously.


Don't get into "jobs bills", that very name is bull. It's subjective based on what you believe government's role needs to be to help private businesses grow.
 
Last edited:
Feb 16, 2005
14,078
5,448
136
They're just starting to date unemployment and don't want to show they're really interested. They want unemployment to come to them, as we as voters (both sides), can arrange that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.