ForumMaster
Diamond Member
i wish i had those temps here. here, it been hot as hell this month. AC's been churning all summer long an isn't going to stop any time soon.
I was real close to a blast furnace this summer in Michigan. The temperature was 125F in the morning and 138F later in the afternoon.Originally posted by: Safeway
Bullshit, I was in Michigan this summer and it was HOT. 80F in the morning to 95F in the afternoon. The temperature above the asphalt at rider height was well over 100F.
Originally posted by: CZroe
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Originally posted by: CZroe
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Please Bing the terms 'outlier' and 'trend' before calling people who believe in science "freaks", asshole.
"Science, damn you."
It sounds more like you believe in the IPCC.
There is a substantial number of scientists in opposition to the man-made GW model, but a very large majority agree with the MMGW hypothesis. I have absolutely no education in the area of climatology so I choose to side with the large majority of qualified individuals. There is still room for discussion, no doubt, but calling those on the side of the majority of experts "freaks" is pathetic and demonstrates a certain insecurity in ones self.
Yeah, but I'm more-or-less commenting on the fact that it is still "faith" in the majority of scientists, considering that we aren't all climatologists ourselves.
"Praise Science."
South Park nailed that "religious science" analogy. 😉
Originally posted by: boomerang
I was real close to a blast furnace this summer in Michigan. The temperature was 125F in the morning and 138F later in the afternoon.Originally posted by: Safeway
Bullshit, I was in Michigan this summer and it was HOT. 80F in the morning to 95F in the afternoon. The temperature above the asphalt at rider height was well over 100F.
My post is about as relevant to the temperature in Michigan as yours.
Originally posted by: CZroe
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Originally posted by: CZroe
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Please Bing the terms 'outlier' and 'trend' before calling people who believe in science "freaks", asshole.
"Science, damn you."
It sounds more like you believe in the IPCC.
There is a substantial number of scientists in opposition to the man-made GW model, but a very large majority agree with the MMGW hypothesis. I have absolutely no education in the area of climatology so I choose to side with the large majority of qualified individuals. There is still room for discussion, no doubt, but calling those on the side of the majority of experts "freaks" is pathetic and demonstrates a certain insecurity in ones self.
Yeah, but I'm more-or-less commenting on the fact that it is still "faith" in the majority of scientists, considering that we aren't all climatologists ourselves.
"Praise Science."
South Park nailed that "religious science" analogy. 😉
Originally posted by: Farang
IN SEATTLE, SWEATING OUR ASSES OFFWhere are all the Global Warming Freaks?
Originally posted by: Kelemvor
I think I heard that here in WI we had our 4th coolest July ever. And of course we got a pool this year and have used it like 5 times.
Originally posted by: eits
thread subtitle = fail.
global warming causes uncharacteristic weather temperatures, including cooling. it's not just warming. it shifts airflows around so cool places could end up warm and warm places could end up cool.
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Originally posted by: CZroe
Yeah, but I'm more-or-less commenting on the fact that it is still "faith" in the majority of scientists, considering that we aren't all climatologists ourselves.
"Praise Science."
South Park nailed that "religious science" analogy. 😉
Picking a side isn't the same thing as having faith. We can assess the evidence ourselves and make an educated guess, and as long as we're willing to admit we're wrong when presented with contrary evidence then it's certainly not faith. Or we can do what I did and side with the majority of experts - in this case I'm making a decision by diverting to people who know more than I do, and I'm more than willing to revise my views if the scientific community presents contrary views.
A faithful view on the science would be arbitrarily picking a side and insisting, despite any evidence, that you're right because you really really really believe it.
Edit - and I'm not saying there aren't GW believers (and skeptics) whose views border on religious fanaticisms - there are. I'm not one of them.
Originally posted by: Analog
Originally posted by: eits
thread subtitle = fail.
global warming causes uncharacteristic weather temperatures, including cooling. it's not just warming. it shifts airflows around so cool places could end up warm and warm places could end up cool.
That's just it, global warming is a religion, you can't prove it, and you can't argue against it. Everything is global warming. If I told you my pet guinea pig got a bladder infection, you could argue that its because of global warming...
That's not a stretch. Here are two 'facts' that have passed as truth by the religion of global warming:
1. Greater CO2 causes more poison ivy to grow, increasing health care costs.
2. Global warming will increase the incidence of kidney stones.
Don't believe it? Google it as NEWS and find out for yourself.
:roll: