- Jan 16, 2014
- 3,580
- 1,629
- 136
A Federal judge appointed by G. W. Bush is considering releasing the Mueller Report with no redactions. Please let it be!
No ruling yet but I'm sure that if he rules to release it then you can bet the Felonious D's private attorneys, I mean the Justice Department, will be quick to appeal.
Walton didn’t issue an opinion from the bench on the case, which centers on a pair of consolidated lawsuits filed against the Justice Department under the Freedom of Information Act. But the judge, an appointee of President George W. Bush, sounded increasingly skeptical of the government's arguments pressing him to leave the redactions untouched. “That’s what open government is about,” Walton said during one exchange, citing the resolution of a 2008 sex crimes case against financier Jeffrey Epstein as an example of how obfuscating the reasons behind not prosecuting high-profile people generates public distrust in the country’s criminal justice system.
...
For example, Walton said he had “some concerns” about trying to reconcile public statements Trump and Attorney General William Barr have made about the report with the content of the report itself. The judge pointed to Trump’s claims that Mueller found “no collusion” between his campaign and Russia and the president’s insistence that he had been exonerated from a possible obstruction of justice charge. These comments, Walton said, appeared bolstered by Barr’s description of Mueller’s findings during a DOJ news conference — before the public and media could read the document for themselves.
No ruling yet but I'm sure that if he rules to release it then you can bet the Felonious D's private attorneys, I mean the Justice Department, will be quick to appeal.
