• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Judge Seeks to Stop Habitual Suer

you dont think any large corp files that many lawsuits? MPAA sues like 10K people last year alone. Sad day when you are denied your day in court IMO.

Way to stop it is loser pays. Not dening rights explict under constitution.

"whose priority is their own financial gain."

WTF else are civil/tort suits about :roll:
 
In most cases, the judge said in Thursday's ruling, Molski seeks damages of $4,000 a day until the target of his suit is brought into compliance with the disabilities act, then agrees to a cash settlement.

Another thing, these obviously wern't frivolous suits as the judge even admits in his ruling the defendants were't in compliance with the law. He just has a problem with enforcement or what? If the federal government won't do it with thier agents, and mearly passed this "feel good" ADA legislation for political grandstanding this man is doing us a service and forceing accountablility, using his time and effort to privatly force compliance for which the government should be charged with. Hero?
 
This sounds like some possible over-stepping by the judge. The guy could have easily had 3 separate "injuries" at three separate restaurants on the same day if he was denied access to them on the same day. Sometimes it takes someone like this to get restaurants to come into compliance with the ADA, which may be the one federal law that is broken most often by businesses.

Having said all of that, we haven't been given nearly enough facts in that article to make a judgment. The reporter appears to have twisted the story to fit HIS agenda.


-Robert
 
Back
Top