• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Judge says something so stupid i had to post it

Yeah... the video game did it. What a dumbass.

And it's the fork's fault for making people fat. Ban forks!
 
He didn't want to shoot her in the head, he just wanted to scare her. Unfortunately, he was accounting for lag time, which isn't really a problem in reality. (Besides the limitations of the speed of light.)

 
They need to patch all existing video games so that once you kill a monster once it is dead forever, and if you die the game is over and gone.
 
Originally posted by: Chiropteran
They need to patch all existing video games so that once you kill a monster once it is dead forever, and if you die the game is over and gone.

Just implement that and call it real mode!
 
I read the full statement and the judge is correct in saying the clearly the kid has something wrong in his head, but it's ridiculous to think that it was caused by or even exacerbated by playing Halo 3. It was a pre-existing condition.
 
Originally posted by: AstroManLuca
I read the full statement and the judge is correct in saying the clearly the kid has something wrong in his head, but it's ridiculous to think that it was caused by or even exacerbated by playing Halo 3. It was a pre-existing condition.

yet in that context his statement wasnt really as stupid as people are making it out to be. he was making a statement on the kids inability to discern real from fantasy, not that video games made him do it. c'mon, think a LITTLE bit deeper than that
 
Originally posted by: hanoverphist
Originally posted by: AstroManLuca
I read the full statement and the judge is correct in saying the clearly the kid has something wrong in his head, but it's ridiculous to think that it was caused by or even exacerbated by playing Halo 3. It was a pre-existing condition.

yet in that context his statement wasnt really as stupid as people are making it out to be. he was making a statement on the kids inability to discern real from fantasy, not that video games made him do it. c'mon, think a LITTLE bit deeper than that

Yeah, I don't see what the big issue is as long as people read the entire statement. Seems fine to me.
 
Originally posted by: hanoverphist
Originally posted by: AstroManLuca
I read the full statement and the judge is correct in saying the clearly the kid has something wrong in his head, but it's ridiculous to think that it was caused by or even exacerbated by playing Halo 3. It was a pre-existing condition.

yet in that context his statement wasnt really as stupid as people are making it out to be. he was making a statement on the kids inability to discern real from fantasy, not that video games made him do it. c'mon, think a LITTLE bit deeper than that


i didn't read the article, but based on the quote, that seems to be how i took it as well. i was like wtf at these people talking about how video made the kid do it..
 
Back
Top