• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Judge Orders San Diego to Remove Cross

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

3chordcharlie

Diamond Member
Mar 30, 2004
9,859
1
81
It was fine when it was put there, I think historical value trumps 'religion' here.

If a monument of that sort was planned now as a cross, I could see that the political and social climate has changed to the point that a cross would be the wrong symbol, but this is just silly.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Yell all you want, but a cross is religious.. so why is it state sanctioned? No reason... so it should be removed...

There are no people forced to go down and bow before that cross. You're merely telling us that its existence is wrong, where as I'm fairly sure the constitution wasn't intended to outlaw religion so much as prevent a Church of England scenario. A religious symbol which is part of our historic foundation does NOT in any way apply to forcing people into a specific religion.

To say that we should destroy historic monuments because we must purge religion from this country is an outright crime in my view. You're taking the protection of the constitution and abusing it to try to forcibly remove religion from this country.

And I've never set foot inside a church. I have no organized religion, I keep my own faith. Yet I am not so cowardly as to be offended by the faith of others.

Has nothing to do with cowardice.. it has to do with state endorsed religious symbols, which is simply not appropriate. End of story.

So by your logic we should remove all the head stones at every military cemetery in the US. We should replace all the headstones at Arlington National Cemetery with something less offensive. No more star of David head stones... No more crosses...

Gimmie a break. :disgust:

That seems a little bit different, after all, Arlignton is first a place of rest for the dead, it is THEIR memory and life we are placing to rest, so it seems reasonable to pick a symbol they would want, and they probably would have appreciated a cross. It's not really our place to decide that for the dead...

Let's be realistic here, our country is literally covered in Christian, and ONLY Christian, religious symbols. Private property, public property, whatever, they are all over the place. All most "anti-Christian" people really want is a little bit of common sense applied to their placement. There is a happy middle ground between banning all religious symbols on public property and feeling like an outsider in your own country.

You have issues if this cross makes you feel like an "outsider". I guess it's only a few thin skinned whiners blowing smoke.

It's been around long enough that its part of the city's history.

I didn't say it made ME feel like an outsider, I am simply saying I understand why this bothers people. The fact that YOU don't understand is hardly surprising, you have no impressed me with your ability to understand beliefs and feelings other than your own.

But just as a little mental exercise, try this (don't strain yourself too hard). Think of the US not as a Christian nation, but say, a Muslim one. You are among the VERY small minority of people who believe in a different faith. Everywhere you go, you see Muslim religious symbols. The President, along with every other past President, is a Muslim...in this particular case, an especially fundamentalist one. He, and most other politicians, are constantly reminding you that this is a Muslim nation, the implication being that YOU are not really a true American. The government is supposedly free of religious influence, but everywhere you look, there are little reminders that this is a government of Muslims, for Muslims, and that you are free to practice whatever faith you want, but the country is a Muslim one. When you point out, even gently, that this might not be what the founding fathers had in mind, you are visciously attacked as a Muslim hater who is trying to destroy the country. Despite the fact that people who think like you are the VAST minority, Muslim pundits rip you apart like you just proposed mass Muslim executions in the streets. And through it all, there is the constant insinuation that, because you don't share in the Muslim faith, you are somehow not really an American.

As I've said, the fact that the country operates this way doesn't bother me. I am not, as you put it, thin skinned. I am not a Christian, either, but the general nonsense we infidels are surrounded with doesn't both most of us. But I can certainly understand why some people have trouble with that part. It's irritating in a way that you, as a member of the majority (and a particularly jackass member at that) have no way of understanding. Do the less thick skinned people have issues? Perhaps, but I wonder how you'd do...how a lot of the religious majority would do...if things we switched around. Because I'm confident that you, at least, have never been in any situation where the majority of people weren't on your side.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
It was fine when it was put there, I think historical value trumps 'religion' here.

If a monument of that sort was planned now as a cross, I could see that the political and social climate has changed to the point that a cross would be the wrong symbol, but this is just silly.

I agree, there are better battlefields for this sort of thing.
 

ntdz

Diamond Member
Aug 5, 2004
6,989
0
0
This decision makes me sick...what the hell is America coming to?
 

daniel49

Diamond Member
Jan 8, 2005
4,814
0
71
Originally posted by: ntdz
This decision makes me sick...what the hell is America coming to?

yeah , I hear ya.
They were actually petitioning to transfer this property to feds...park dept.. when the judge stepped in and stopped that...but the battles not over yet.
Just sent my note to DC this morning on this issue. If they get enough reaction, we may get action.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: daniel49
Originally posted by: ntdz
This decision makes me sick...what the hell is America coming to?

yeah , I hear ya.
They were actually petitioning to transfer this property to feds...park dept.. when the judge stepped in and stopped that...but the battles not over yet.
Just sent my note to DC this morning on this issue. If they get enough reaction, we may get action.

Won't somebody please stand up for those poor, oppressed Christians... ;)
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
31,377
47,652
136
Sounds like the typical religious hijacking of an issue to me. It should be removed, bravo judge! I wonder how the families of Jewish Americans who died in Korea feel about it? This is why war memorials usually have more to do with the war they represent than one particular religion (see Iwo Jima or Vietnam Memorial for example). 1954, same year they warped the pledge of allegiance for political and religious concerns. This monument was likely born out of the same movement.

Christians who want to stamp their religious subscription over a conflict are more than welcome to start a fundraiser for a Crusades monument. Short of that, build whatever you want on church property, with church money. It's important to note no one is advocating the destruction of this monument, merely a change in it's location.


Just another case of other people pissing on other people's interests just because they can.

I disagree. Something tells me had you a father, uncle or grandfather who wasn't christian and was KIA in Korea, you would too.

 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
I would LOVE to see the reactions of people like Zendari if huge jewish stars or buddhist statues or mentions of Allah were all over our public buildings and monuments... of course, since HE happens to follow christianity, christian symbols are perfectly ok!

Inability to see outside of one's own view is called closemindedness.

He is not closedminded, he is just a typical Republican puppet.

Quite a bit is starting to come around back at their misdeeds, maybe there is a glimmer of hope for the U.S. Only time will tell.
 

daniel49

Diamond Member
Jan 8, 2005
4,814
0
71
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
I would LOVE to see the reactions of people like Zendari if huge jewish stars or buddhist statues or mentions of Allah were all over our public buildings and monuments... of course, since HE happens to follow christianity, christian symbols are perfectly ok!

Inability to see outside of one's own view is called closemindedness.

He is not closedminded, he is just a typical Republican puppet.

Quite a bit is starting to come around back at their misdeeds, maybe there is a glimmer of hope for the U.S. Only time will tell.

Quit it , your sounding like a Politics and News sheeple.
 

GroundedSailor

Platinum Member
Feb 18, 2001
2,502
0
76
Originally posted by: kage69
Sounds like the typical religious hijacking of an issue to me. It should be removed, bravo judge! I wonder how the families of Jewish Americans who died in Korea feel about it? This is why war memorials usually have more to do with the war they represent than one particular religion (see Iwo Jima or Vietnam Memorial for example). 1954, same year they warped the pledge of allegiance for political and religious concerns. This monument was likely born out of the same movement.

Christians who want to stamp their religious subscription over a conflict are more than welcome to start a fundraiser for a Crusades monument. Short of that, build whatever you want on church property, with church money. It's important to note no one is advocating the destruction of this monument, merely a change in it's location.


Just another case of other people pissing on other people's interests just because they can.

I disagree. Something tells me had you a father, uncle or grandfather who wasn't christian and was KIA in Korea, you would too.
Couldn't agaree with you more. The cross is too much of a Christian symbol to represent all the war veterans. I wonder who the Mayor is?


 

zendari

Banned
May 27, 2005
6,558
0
0
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
I would LOVE to see the reactions of people like Zendari if huge jewish stars or buddhist statues or mentions of Allah were all over our public buildings and monuments... of course, since HE happens to follow christianity, christian symbols are perfectly ok!

Inability to see outside of one's own view is called closemindedness.

He is not closedminded, he is just a typical Republican puppet.

Quite a bit is starting to come around back at their misdeeds, maybe there is a glimmer of hope for the U.S. Only time will tell.

If it's just a statue in the ground, I wouldn't care.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
I would LOVE to see the reactions of people like Zendari if huge jewish stars or buddhist statues or mentions of Allah were all over our public buildings and monuments... of course, since HE happens to follow christianity, christian symbols are perfectly ok!

Inability to see outside of one's own view is called closemindedness.

He is not closedminded, he is just a typical Republican puppet.

Quite a bit is starting to come around back at their misdeeds, maybe there is a glimmer of hope for the U.S. Only time will tell.

If it's just a statue in the ground, I wouldn't care.

It's not just a statue in the ground though, it's a memorial for the veterans of the Korean War...something that has little to do with Christianity, and is kind of offensive to those vets who AREN'T Christian. I mean, what's the message, we remember your service...as long as you are Christian, otherwise, piss off?
 

3chordcharlie

Diamond Member
Mar 30, 2004
9,859
1
81
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
I would LOVE to see the reactions of people like Zendari if huge jewish stars or buddhist statues or mentions of Allah were all over our public buildings and monuments... of course, since HE happens to follow christianity, christian symbols are perfectly ok!

Inability to see outside of one's own view is called closemindedness.

He is not closedminded, he is just a typical Republican puppet.

Quite a bit is starting to come around back at their misdeeds, maybe there is a glimmer of hope for the U.S. Only time will tell.

If it's just a statue in the ground, I wouldn't care.

It's not just a statue in the ground though, it's a memorial for the veterans of the Korean War...something that has little to do with Christianity, and is kind of offensive to those vets who AREN'T Christian. I mean, what's the message, we remember your service...as long as you are Christian, otherwise, piss off?

It's also 52 years old, and no one said boo about it for the first 35 years. I think it should simply be left as it is; there's no comparison between this and trying to add new monuments of the ten commandments to courthouses, and that sort of thing.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
I would LOVE to see the reactions of people like Zendari if huge jewish stars or buddhist statues or mentions of Allah were all over our public buildings and monuments... of course, since HE happens to follow christianity, christian symbols are perfectly ok!

Inability to see outside of one's own view is called closemindedness.

He is not closedminded, he is just a typical Republican puppet.

Quite a bit is starting to come around back at their misdeeds, maybe there is a glimmer of hope for the U.S. Only time will tell.

If it's just a statue in the ground, I wouldn't care.

It's not just a statue in the ground though, it's a memorial for the veterans of the Korean War...something that has little to do with Christianity, and is kind of offensive to those vets who AREN'T Christian. I mean, what's the message, we remember your service...as long as you are Christian, otherwise, piss off?

It's also 52 years old, and no one said boo about it for the first 35 years. I think it should simply be left as it is; there's no comparison between this and trying to add new monuments of the ten commandments to courthouses, and that sort of thing.

I suppose, but up until fairly recently, even talking about changing it would get you blacklisted as some sort of commie.
 

3chordcharlie

Diamond Member
Mar 30, 2004
9,859
1
81
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
It's also 52 years old, and no one said boo about it for the first 35 years. I think it should simply be left as it is; there's no comparison between this and trying to add new monuments of the ten commandments to courthouses, and that sort of thing.

I suppose, but up until fairly recently, even talking about changing it would get you blacklisted as some sort of commie.

True enough, I have no problem with talking about it, I just think the final decision is obvious: leave it alone.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
It's also 52 years old, and no one said boo about it for the first 35 years. I think it should simply be left as it is; there's no comparison between this and trying to add new monuments of the ten commandments to courthouses, and that sort of thing.

I suppose, but up until fairly recently, even talking about changing it would get you blacklisted as some sort of commie.

True enough, I have no problem with talking about it, I just think the final decision is obvious: leave it alone.

Agreed on that part, I've said before I think there are bigger fish to fry. And looking at it from a logical perspective, making a big stink over EVERYTHING makes it less likely you'll get your way when it really matters.