Judge orders early voting restored in Ohio

shira

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2005
9,500
6
81
I am so glad to see someone have some common sense on this.

-------------------------------------

News Link

What a surprise: Republicans had passed a law that allows members of the military (= disproportionately Republican) all of the early-voting days that were available before the change. But all other voters (= majority Democrat) were prevented from voting on three of those days.
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,041
136
Don't worry, they'll (repubs) find another way to fix the problem that doesn't exist (except in their minds). Have faith, aren't they governed by a former Faux News talking head?
 

thraashman

Lifer
Apr 10, 2000
11,112
1,587
126
Don't worry, they'll (repubs) find another way to fix the problem that doesn't exist (except in their minds). Have faith, aren't they governed by a former Faux News talking head?

Actually, Republicans are fixing a problem that does exist. That problem is that a fair system favors Democrats. So they're fixing the system to be not fair.
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,041
136
Actually, Republicans are fixing a problem that does exist. That problem is that a fair system favors Democrats. So they're fixing the system to be not fair.

If the repubs had their way, only white, male, landowners could vote
you know. like in the Good Ole Days...:p
 

Cozarkian

Golden Member
Feb 2, 2012
1,352
95
91
What's the purpose of this law in the first place? Either mail in your absentee ballot or go to your polling place on election day and vote in person. Why does anyone need to vote early, in person, by absentee?
 

shira

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2005
9,500
6
81
What's the purpose of this law in the first place? Either mail in your absentee ballot or go to your polling place on election day and vote in person. Why does anyone need to vote early, in person, by absentee?

Could it possibly be the case that giving voters more voting options encourages more voter participation in elections? That's of course something Republicans do NOT want to facilitate, since the greater the turnout the greater the probability that the Republican candidate or the Republican preference on ballot initiatives will lose.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,977
30,861
136
What's the purpose of this law in the first place? Either mail in your absentee ballot or go to your polling place on election day and vote in person. Why does anyone need to vote early, in person, by absentee?

Why do you seem to be opposed to maximizing the opportunity for people to vote in an election?
 

shira

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2005
9,500
6
81
Why do you seem to be opposed to maximizing the opportunity for people to vote in an election?

Clearly, too many of the "wrong kind of people" voting leads to "bad" election results. Republicans are for "good" election results.
 

Cozarkian

Golden Member
Feb 2, 2012
1,352
95
91
Why do you seem to be opposed to maximizing the opportunity for people to vote in an election?

I don't oppose laws because they maximize the opportunity to vote. Although I would, for example, oppose a law that creates an election week instead of an election day because of the added cost. My concern with this law is all the time and money that was wasted passing the law, amending the law, and overturning the amendment, all for a law that serves no real purpose, because there are already sufficient opportunities to vote and it doesn't in any way address the real problem with low voter turnout, that people don't take their civic duty to cast an educated vote seriously.

Now that the law is in place, it might as well stay on the books (assuming the extra costs create are minimal), but it's still a stupid fight about a stupid law.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Actually, Republicans are fixing a problem that does exist. That problem is that a fair system favors Democrats. So they're fixing the system to be not fair.

Bada-bing!

Win. lose or draw, greater turnout give a more accurate reflection of the will of the electorate. That's simple math.

If there's 50% turnout & a 50.1% win, There's no real mandate in that, certainly not enough to validate a radical agenda. Low turnout encourages organized radical takeover, so they'll try to create it if they can. That's the underlying goal in all the doom & gloom, the "They're just as Bad!" rhetoric, the attacks on voter registration efforts- to foster apathy & disconnection from the political process.

It gives zealots a lot more sway than they deserve, quite by design.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
I strongly favor Oregon's vote by mail system, largely because turnout is enormous, fraud virtually non-existent. No discouraging lines & people are free to fill out their choices at their leisure, even to research the proposals online w/ the ballot right in front of them or just vote on what they care about, send it in. It's utterly fair & doesn't suffer from misallocation of voting machines or any voting resources. It cuts through the bullshit.
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
Isn't this the one where there was like 11 early voting day but some people got upset because 3 of them were for military only?

EDIT* I must correct myself.

"Majority Republicans have made other changes to Ohio's voting rules. This year, they eliminated so-called golden week, a period when residents could both register to vote and cast an early ballot at the same time. Without those days, early voting will typically start 29 days before Election Day."

It must be a real bitch to get in your vote in Ohio with only 30 days of voting allowed.
 
Last edited:

michal1980

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2003
8,019
43
91
I'm surprised democrats are alive. everything is so fucking hard for them. Like voting on election day.

How many extra days do they need to make up votes?
 
Jan 25, 2011
17,096
9,578
146
Isn't this the one where there was like 11 early voting day but some people got upset because 3 of them were for military only?

EDIT* I must correct myself.

"Majority Republicans have made other changes to Ohio's voting rules. This year, they eliminated so-called golden week, a period when residents could both register to vote and cast an early ballot at the same time. Without those days, early voting will typically start 29 days before Election Day."


It must be a real bitch to get in your vote in Ohio with only 30 days of voting allowed.

So you have no issues with only certain classes of people being afforded more opportunities to vote? Which is what this case was about. Cutting out the three heaviest early voting days for some people while leaving them in place for a select few.

Equal access for everyone to voting shouldn't be opposed by anyone.
 

DrDoug

Diamond Member
Jan 16, 2014
3,580
1,629
136
I strongly favor Oregon's vote by mail system, largely because turnout is enormous, fraud virtually non-existent. No discouraging lines & people are free to fill out their choices at their leisure, even to research the proposals online w/ the ballot right in front of them or just vote on what they care about, send it in. It's utterly fair & doesn't suffer from misallocation of voting machines or any voting resources. It cuts through the bullshit.

I live in Oregon and you nailed it. Voting is easy and everyone who is registered gets a ballot, increasing participation. That's far better than forcing people to go to some location at a certain time, possibly standing in line for hours. You have restroom issues, parking, maybe kids that need watching, issues with the infirm and elderly, plus you have people who are working and may not be off during those hours/days.

Versus picking up your mail, opening your ballot envelope, researching any ballot issues/candidates if you have questions, filling the ballot out at your convenience, placing it in the unmarked ballot envelope, placing that in a second envelope that you then sign and then drop it off at a drop box at City Hall when you are out and about (or mail it in).

Get with the 21st century...lol!
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,977
30,861
136
I live in Oregon and you nailed it. Voting is easy and everyone who is registered gets a ballot, increasing participation. That's far better than forcing people to go to some location at a certain time, possibly standing in line for hours. You have restroom issues, parking, maybe kids that need watching, issues with the infirm and elderly, plus you have people who are working and may not be off during those hours/days.

Versus picking up your mail, opening your ballot envelope, researching any ballot issues/candidates if you have questions, filling the ballot out at your convenience, placing it in the unmarked ballot envelope, placing that in a second envelope that you then sign and then drop it off at a drop box at City Hall when you are out and about (or mail it in).

Get with the 21st century...lol!

Sounds like a pretty good system
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,770
6,770
126
Society is arranged in such a way that a privileged class maintains it privileged status and tries to control the vote to keep it that way. Their sense of entitlement and inherited arrogance reverts them from seeing the injustice of this.
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
Society is arranged in such a way that a privileged class maintains it privileged status and tries to control the vote to keep it that way. Their sense of entitlement and inherited arrogance reverts them from seeing the injustice of this.

Ya, trying to allocate 3 days for our servicemen out of a month of early voting sure sounds like the privileged class trying maintain it privileged status.

We only have a month of early voting!! The fascists are taking over the world!!!

I just want you to see how ridiculous you sound. I know, I have a brain defect, I hate myself, I am projecting my hatred on others and I have intimacy issues because I never breast fed.
 

CLite

Golden Member
Dec 6, 2005
1,726
7
76
Ya, trying to allocate 3 days for our servicemen out of a month of early voting sure sounds like the privileged class trying maintain it privileged status.

We only have a month of early voting!! The fascists are taking over the world!!!

I just want you to see how ridiculous you sound. I know, I have a brain defect, I hate myself, I am projecting my hatred on others and I have intimacy issues because I never breast fed.

There is not nor ever was a month of in-person early voting at polling stations in Ohio. There was 3 days of in-person early voting in Ohio starting the Friday before the Tuesday election day. This was revoked and the court has since restored it.

I think you are talking about in-person absentee voting which you have to request from your county office and then show up for that specific request. This you can do beginning with the voter registration (which is approximately 30 days prior to general election). It is very different than having polling stations open for general access, which is what the three days of early voting were prior to their attempted removal.

http://www.sos.state.oh.us/SOS/elections/Voters/absentee/inperson.aspx
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Ya, trying to allocate 3 days for our servicemen out of a month of early voting sure sounds like the privileged class trying maintain it privileged status.

We only have a month of early voting!! The fascists are taking over the world!!!

I just want you to see how ridiculous you sound. I know, I have a brain defect, I hate myself, I am projecting my hatred on others and I have intimacy issues because I never breast fed.


So, uhh, members of the military should be more equal than the rest of us?

It's unconstitutional on face value alone. Funny how a bunch of right wing lawyers, Ohio Repub Legislators, managed to overlook that little detail in their efforts to pander to the military.