Jon Stewart rails on Republicans over veterans benefit bill.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Sunburn74

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2009
5,076
2,635
136
As a veteran I think ‘support the troops’ often goes way too far but one area it absolutely should go to is people suffering from debilitating health issues incurred in the line of duty. This should be a no brainer.
First of all I think all conditions should be covered and it's kind of a no brainer from a practicality standpoint but I understand the concerns.
I think for me it's hard to rectify paying for every health malady that a veteran has when often they smoke, drink like crazy after their service. The issue is some of the health maladies they face aren't necessarily from the exposures they had during service. A vet could claim his heart attack is from burn pits but if he smoked or has a strong family history of heart attacks it's not necessarily the burn pits at play.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,504
20,111
146
Looks like they wanted to remove $400B of Democrat pork from the bill and scumbag Schumer tried to use sick vets as political pawns. As much as Congress over indexes on pork in bills, the useful idiots on this board under index on research and truth.


Ya know, it's funny, none of them can post the "pork."

I challenge you to find this "pork."


It's BULLSHIT.

So either post the pork, or make a formal retraction here and denounce the lies by the GOP leadership to cover up their petty refusal to pass a bill to "own the libs" while screwing Vets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leeea

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
26,747
16,033
136
Jon should run as *something*. Isnt there an R Senator somewhere he could pounce?
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
73,535
35,228
136
Jon should run as *something*. Isnt there an R Senator somewhere he could pounce?
While he would be an improvement over any current Republican politician, Jon Stewart is still a mouth piece for the ultra-wealthy and staunch defender of the status quo. He's just more witty about it than most.
 

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
15,142
10,043
136
While he would be an improvement over any current Republican politician, Jon Stewart is still a mouth piece for the ultra-wealthy and staunch defender of the status quo. He's just more witty about it than most.

Probably it could be argued that culturally he's not very far-removed from the 'ultra wealthy' (like everyone in the top ranks of the media he's clearly not short of cash, and shares a lot of the self-interests and cultural values of that class) but where has he "staunchly defended the status quo"? Are you referring to anything in particular, because if so, I missed it.

Are you arguing he's some sort of accredited 'court jester', defusing real dissent via light-satire? That seems a sort of ultra-demanding analysis that would be more reasonable if the situation weren't so dire, and also the sort of thing I'd expect to hear from the actual far-left, which I don't have the impression that you are.

Basically, I don't understand where you are coming from with this comment.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
73,535
35,228
136
Stewart uses a technique well worn by The Village Voice chain of newspapers in decades past. Set yourself up as a hip and liberal sounding outlet. Accept that the right is just wrong and waste little time on them. Spend your time picking at every foible and scab on the left, paying particular attention to any issues that divide, doing so in a witty manner, of course. The effect is damaging the ability of the left to work together to get anything done while leaving the right untouched.
 

Tsinni Dave

Senior member
Mar 1, 2022
559
1,378
106
The problem is that fundamentally serious issues pretty much need a "celebrity" to draw attention to an issue that should be a no-brainer to anyone with empathy, but that the celebrity's fame and past can be used by the opposition to denigrate the entire issue and hand wave it away. Perhaps now would be a good time to reference Boebert and Marjorie Greene heckling Biden when he brought this issue up during the State of the Union address and that regardless of who backs this legislation, it comes down to "party before country" for many.
I guess "party before reality" would be a more apt description of this behaviour.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
26,477
12,607
136
First of all I think all conditions should be covered and it's kind of a no brainer from a practicality standpoint but I understand the concerns.
I think for me it's hard to rectify paying for every health malady that a veteran has when often they smoke, drink like crazy after their service. The issue is some of the health maladies they face aren't necessarily from the exposures they had during service. A vet could claim his heart attack is from burn pits but if he smoked or has a strong family history of heart attacks it's not necessarily the burn pits at play.
As an non-military person who worked in a military world, it was amazing to me, how many retirements were held up due to determining the amount of disability. Sleep apnea was high on the list. Of course I worked with a military branch that's mostly made of technicians and mechanics that happened to occasionally be exposed to actual conflict (Navy). Next was knees. I know my knees took a beating climbing ladders and standing on metal decks on submarines for 39 odd years.
 
Last edited:

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,687
10,410
136
Stewart uses a technique well worn by The Village Voice chain of newspapers in decades past. Set yourself up as a hip and liberal sounding outlet. Accept that the right is just wrong and waste little time on them. Spend your time picking at every foible and scab on the left, paying particular attention to any issues that divide, doing so in a witty manner, of course. The effect is damaging the ability of the left to work together to get anything done while leaving the right untouched.

Are you confusing Stewart with Bill Maher?
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
16,079
8,678
136
This just proves how the GQP is full of shit about supporting veterans.

I'm a retired Army veteran and I cannot tell you how often I see phony fucking conservatives trying to use ME as a false dichotomy between immigrants and veterans when they consistently vote AGAINST our benefits and healthcare any-fucking-how.


Myself being a retiree from the military, I think you're spot on with your observations as I've seen and heard the same drivel from the Repubs for the past few decades. To add insult to injury, these same Repubs will, with no shame whatsoever take credit for the very same legislation they previously fought tooth and nail against with their voters, many of whom are veterans, being scammed by it all.
 

JTsyo

Lifer
Nov 18, 2007
12,063
1,157
126
I'm surprised the right wing sites were giving Jon a chance to explaining what happened.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,827
33,451
136
Looks like they wanted to remove $400B of Democrat pork from the bill and scumbag Schumer tried to use sick vets as political pawns. As much as Congress over indexes on pork in bills, the useful idiots on this board under index on research and truth.


Have you come back to identify the so called pork? At least man up and admit you once again fell for right wing lies
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Captante

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
26,747
16,033
136
While he would be an improvement over any current Republican politician, Jon Stewart is still a mouth piece for the ultra-wealthy and staunch defender of the status quo. He's just more witty about it than most.
I mean thats fine, as long as its honest, I dont think he's the type to take a bribe or suddenly grow sociopath.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,827
33,451
136
Want a good laugh? Go to to Fox News FB post about this bill. They decided to be honest for once and you should see the pages of pure bullshit. People making up so called pork.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
26,747
16,033
136
So, diving into the comment section on Fox News on FB you'll find stuff like this

2022-07-31 16_55_40-Fox News _ Facebook — Mozilla Firefox.png


Fox comment section is like a national health emergency... someone do something.
 

Maxima1

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,549
761
146
Um, so you think it's a con?
I'm wondering if you can read that article and understand what it says.

Workman’s comp pays for work-related injuries/illnesses. Military disability pays for complaints that begin after enlistment and one year out (more years for some presumptive stuff). Service related should mean something that happens doing your job. Currently it means much more than that and compensates so much better than civilian world.

Military disability includes essentially anything that arises: diabetes, anxiety, depression, sleep apnea, GERD, fibromyalgia (I.e. even complaints of aches and pains with no injury event), etc.

A CT scan I had showed degenerative disk. This is surprisingly common in young people. Yet that would likely get me 10% rating. Many people with high physical ratings along with high psych “disabilities” can still hit the gym and pass the police academy, and in fact, they encourage it.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ans-become-cops-some-bring-war-home/99349228/

"In states with the most stringent hiring preferences, such as New Jersey and Massachusetts, a police applicant who was honorably discharged from the military leaps over those who don’t have those credentials. Disabled veterans outflank military veterans with no documented health concerns. Thomas, the PTSD-afflicted Newark cop, held a secure place on the sergeant's promotions list because of his time with the New Jersey Air National Guard.
[…]
Smith re-joined the force with a 100% disability rating, suffering from flashbacks, blackouts, and waking-nightmares; nevertheless, the department assigned him to patrol a high-crime area of town known as “the War Zone.”
[…]
When police officers return to work after a military deployment, federal law — the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act — prohibits their departments from requiring blanket mental health evaluations. Because of the Americans With Disabilities Act, police departments can’t reject a job candidate for simply having a PTSD diagnosis.”


The percentage is higher because of 3 factors: More NEARLY CONTINUOUS combat post 9/11 (biggest factor by far).

Combat service is the highest risk job possible. So of course a significant number opf veterans aregoi8ng to have partial or full disability.

It was low intensity, so even for combat, “shell shock” cases are rare, and while I don’t have the numbers with me, many people who went to Iraq & Afghanistan probably never left the FOB or for just a small portion of the deployment. They had creature comforts even there. This also is about every veteran since 9/11. Support roles across the states and elsewhere outnumber combat roles by a lot.

Higher survivability by combat wounded.
7000+ Killed x 7 for wounded in action hardly explains it.

Here, I’ll give you a clue:

"To get paid for PTSD, veterans must link their symptoms to trauma that occurred during their service. In 2010, the VA expanded what situations could qualify. Credible fear of being attacked — without actually suffering or witnessing violence — became sufficient.

The VA also dropped its requirement to support each case of war-related PTSD with records of the underlying trauma. Those veterans are now taken at their word.

After the changes, the number of new PTSD claims rose 60% to more than 150,000 a year, and approval rates jumped from 55% to 74%"
[I think this figure doesn’t include appeals].

This is just PTSD, You still have anxiety, depression, and adjustment disorder.

And better recognition of PTSD.

In civilian world, it’s seen as temporary and people are expected to move on with no compensation. About a dozen states don’t even have PTSD workers’ comp for the first responders (lots only changed in recent years), others have it but also require a physical injury, and if they do have it without a physical element, it’s still more restricted and temporary with shit payouts relative to military.

New York:

PTSD: Prognosis
PTSD is a complex phenomenon. While the impact of PTSD on the lives
of affected persons is significant, there is a notable body of evidence that
indicates that PTSD may be successfully treated
using established,
evidenced based methods discussed below. Despite the complexities of
PTSD, the prognosis is good with the vast majority of people recovering
to lead productive lives. A minority (approx. 4-22%) develop chronic
PTSD.


https://www.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article249810168.html

Kansas first responders with PTSD ‘suffered in silence.’ Workers comp doesn’t cover it

If you're trying to imply that VA disability is being conned or too easy to get, you have no, and I mean NO FUCKING idea what you're talking about.

oh-fuck-off-go-away.gif


“Always infuriating seeing that guy who spent his whole contract on profile, never did any field events or deployments and then somehow gets 70% disability. Makes you feel like an idiot for putting effort into your job”

Duckworth directed her ire at Castillo, but the real culprit was the broad eligibility criteria of the disability system itself. The contractor had played by the rules for benefits and, as many Washington lawmakers know, those benefits cover ailments from sports injuries to bullet wounds, resulting in disability payouts that totaled $58 billion this fiscal year — up from $49 billion last year.

Routinely criticized in government reviews as out of touch with modern concepts of disability, the system has strayed far from its official purpose of compensating veterans for their lost earning capacity.
Yet lawmakers are unwilling to support reforms — or even to criticize the system publicly.

“If Social Security is the third rail of American politics, then the VA disability system is the fourth, nuclear rail,” said Michael McLendon, a top VA policy official until 2006.

Duckworth, a Democrat, declined to be interviewed about the disability system. So did Republicans who have led attempts to end unnecessary federal spending, including Arizona Sen. John McCain and Reps. Darrell Issa of California and Paul Ryan of Wisconsin.
[…]
“I defy you to find another side to the discussion about vets,” said Bill Brew, a Vietnam veteran who spent 25 years on staff of the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs before retiring in 2011. “It doesn’t exist.”
As the number of U.S. veterans has declined from 26.4 million to 22 million over the last 14 years and military service has fallen to a small number of volunteers, “Thank you for your service” has become a national meme as the political parties compete to stand up for them.

The arcane rules of the disability system are protected by what Brew and others on staff came to refer to as “the iron triangle”: The VA, veterans groups and lawmakers.


“The easy course is to spew the rhetoric that is wildly supportive of veterans,” Brew said.

It’s VASTLY better than options civilians have.

If not PTSD for mental part, the military as mentioned above has a fallback in the psych eval with high anxiety and depression ratings, and “adjustment disorder”. Malingerers routinely get rewarded and people get high ratings for shit that has nothing to do with the military. A big one for career military is sleep apnea. If in the lucky 20% who get 100% sleep apnea, that’s better than officer retirement.


“Seriously though, if you’ve EVER worked shift-work, please get a sleep study done before you separate. It’s an *easy 50% guys.”

*He says this because a lot of people who get the rating aren’t actually tired at work, but regardless probably 99.999% is from being overweight.

BTW,. the vast majority are 30% or less, which means NO BENEIFITS. Less than half are 60% or higher.

That’s only in the case of retirement. Military disability is almost never decreased, but it is common for an increase. Moreover, 60% and higher can possibly be paid the same as 100% P&T under a few easy to meet conditions if the veteran doesn’t want to work, and they can have expedited SSDI claims too with no offset. Besides that, you’re not even bothering to compare to civilians if you want to suggest that those numbers aren’t much.

https://www.benefits.va.gov/BENEFITS/factsheets/serviceconnected/IU.pdf

“Individual Unemployability (IU) is a unique part of VA’s disability compensation
program. It allows VA to pay certain Veterans compensation at the 100 percent rate,

even though VA has not rated their service-connected disabilities at that level”


 
  • Wow
Reactions: hal2kilo

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,504
20,111
146
Workman’s comp pays for work-related injuries/illnesses. Military disability pays for complaints that begin after enlistment and one year out (more years for some presumptive stuff). Service related should mean something that happens doing your job. Currently it means much more than that and compensates so much better than civilian world.

Military disability includes essentially anything that arises: diabetes, anxiety, depression, sleep apnea, GERD, fibromyalgia (I.e. even complaints of aches and pains with no injury event), etc.

A CT scan I had showed degenerative disk. This is surprisingly common in young people. Yet that would likely get me 10% rating. Many people with high physical ratings along with high psych “disabilities” can still hit the gym and pass the police academy, and in fact, they encourage it.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ans-become-cops-some-bring-war-home/99349228/

"In states with the most stringent hiring preferences, such as New Jersey and Massachusetts, a police applicant who was honorably discharged from the military leaps over those who don’t have those credentials. Disabled veterans outflank military veterans with no documented health concerns. Thomas, the PTSD-afflicted Newark cop, held a secure place on the sergeant's promotions list because of his time with the New Jersey Air National Guard.
[…]
Smith re-joined the force with a 100% disability rating, suffering from flashbacks, blackouts, and waking-nightmares; nevertheless, the department assigned him to patrol a high-crime area of town known as “the War Zone.”
[…]
When police officers return to work after a military deployment, federal law — the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act — prohibits their departments from requiring blanket mental health evaluations. Because of the Americans With Disabilities Act, police departments can’t reject a job candidate for simply having a PTSD diagnosis.”




It was low intensity, so even for combat, “shell shock” cases are rare, and while I don’t have the numbers with me, many people who went to Iraq & Afghanistan probably never left the FOB or for just a small portion of the deployment. They had creature comforts even there. This also is about every veteran since 9/11. Support roles across the states and elsewhere outnumber combat roles by a lot.


7000+ Killed x 7 for wounded in action hardly explains it.

Here, I’ll give you a clue:

"To get paid for PTSD, veterans must link their symptoms to trauma that occurred during their service. In 2010, the VA expanded what situations could qualify. Credible fear of being attacked — without actually suffering or witnessing violence — became sufficient.

The VA also dropped its requirement to support each case of war-related PTSD with records of the underlying trauma. Those veterans are now taken at their word.

After the changes, the number of new PTSD claims rose 60% to more than 150,000 a year, and approval rates jumped from 55% to 74%"
[I think this figure doesn’t include appeals].

This is just PTSD, You still have anxiety, depression, and adjustment disorder.



In civilian world, it’s seen as temporary and people are expected to move on with no compensation. About a dozen states don’t even have PTSD workers’ comp for the first responders (lots only changed in recent years), others have it but also require a physical injury, and if they do have it without a physical element, it’s still more restricted and temporary with shit payouts relative to military.

New York:

PTSD: Prognosis
PTSD is a complex phenomenon. While the impact of PTSD on the lives
of affected persons is significant, there is a notable body of evidence that
indicates that PTSD may be successfully treated
using established,
evidenced based methods discussed below. Despite the complexities of
PTSD, the prognosis is good with the vast majority of people recovering
to lead productive lives. A minority (approx. 4-22%) develop chronic
PTSD.


https://www.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article249810168.html

Kansas first responders with PTSD ‘suffered in silence.’ Workers comp doesn’t cover it



oh-fuck-off-go-away.gif


“Always infuriating seeing that guy who spent his whole contract on profile, never did any field events or deployments and then somehow gets 70% disability. Makes you feel like an idiot for putting effort into your job”

Duckworth directed her ire at Castillo, but the real culprit was the broad eligibility criteria of the disability system itself. The contractor had played by the rules for benefits and, as many Washington lawmakers know, those benefits cover ailments from sports injuries to bullet wounds, resulting in disability payouts that totaled $58 billion this fiscal year — up from $49 billion last year.

Routinely criticized in government reviews as out of touch with modern concepts of disability, the system has strayed far from its official purpose of compensating veterans for their lost earning capacity.
Yet lawmakers are unwilling to support reforms — or even to criticize the system publicly.

“If Social Security is the third rail of American politics, then the VA disability system is the fourth, nuclear rail,” said Michael McLendon, a top VA policy official until 2006.

Duckworth, a Democrat, declined to be interviewed about the disability system. So did Republicans who have led attempts to end unnecessary federal spending, including Arizona Sen. John McCain and Reps. Darrell Issa of California and Paul Ryan of Wisconsin.
[…]
“I defy you to find another side to the discussion about vets,” said Bill Brew, a Vietnam veteran who spent 25 years on staff of the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs before retiring in 2011. “It doesn’t exist.”
As the number of U.S. veterans has declined from 26.4 million to 22 million over the last 14 years and military service has fallen to a small number of volunteers, “Thank you for your service” has become a national meme as the political parties compete to stand up for them.

The arcane rules of the disability system are protected by what Brew and others on staff came to refer to as “the iron triangle”: The VA, veterans groups and lawmakers.


“The easy course is to spew the rhetoric that is wildly supportive of veterans,” Brew said.

It’s VASTLY better than options civilians have.

If not PTSD for mental part, the military as mentioned above has a fallback in the psych eval with high anxiety and depression ratings, and “adjustment disorder”. Malingerers routinely get rewarded and people get high ratings for shit that has nothing to do with the military. A big one for career military is sleep apnea. If in the lucky 20% who get 100% sleep apnea, that’s better than officer retirement.


“Seriously though, if you’ve EVER worked shift-work, please get a sleep study done before you separate. It’s an *easy 50% guys.”

*He says this because a lot of people who get the rating aren’t actually tired at work, but regardless probably 99.999% is from being overweight.



That’s only in the case of retirement. Military disability is almost never decreased, but it is common for an increase. Moreover, 60% and higher can possibly be paid the same as 100% P&T under a few easy to meet conditions if the veteran doesn’t want to work, and they can have expedited SSDI claims too with no offset. Besides that, you’re not even bothering to compare to civilians if you want to suggest that those numbers aren’t much.

https://www.benefits.va.gov/BENEFITS/factsheets/serviceconnected/IU.pdf

“Individual Unemployability (IU) is a unique part of VA’s disability compensation
program. It allows VA to pay certain Veterans compensation at the 100 percent rate,

even though VA has not rated their service-connected disabilities at that level”

I give you the republican response to veterans. We're conmen on the take according to sketchy politicians, and reddit posts.

Tell me. What branch did you serve? How much work have you done with veterans?

You may think your ur post proves something. And it does. A raging case of confirmation bias and cherry picking.