<< Looking for a player that could spark the offense makes more sense to me than bringing in a new coach, alienating fans and players who liked Dungy, and throwing away draft choices that just might have offered the spark that the offense needed. Or, at least been used as trade fodder to acquire better personel. Throwing a new coach in there just seems like a step backwards. >>
I disagree, bringing in a strong, offensive-minded, aggressive coach like John Gruden was an excellent move for the Bucs. I have a lot of respect for Tony Dungy, but I feel that he was just too calm, collected and NICE to be the Buc's coach. Dealing with players like Warren Sapp and K. Johnson takes a Type-A personality who isn't willing to put up with their egotistical, big-headed attitudes.
I do agree that the Glazers went about the situation very un-ethically. They seemed to bite off more than they could chew and most likely had to pay more for Gruden than if they had offered the Raiders GM and Gruden a reasonable amount of money/trading position(s) in the first place. Gruden could likely get more money than Spurrier, though it would suprise me if the Glazers unleased their "tight" wallets that much. They way they let Dungy go showed immaturity.
The Bucs have great potential, their team is full of ProBowlers, but they just haven't jelled together offensively. I am not saying that the Bucs will do a 180 merely because Gruden pulls the strings, but I am saying that I feel that the situation must be looked at positively. If he can get the players attention and respect, then his ability to produce a great offense will be able to shine.
We'll just have to see what happens. But, Gruden has my support all the way.