John Edwards? Voting Record Shows Animosity Towards Taxpayers

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Originally posted by: conjur
Berthoud spoke at the Chicago Conservative Conference 2002
Sponsored by these leading conservative organizations:

American Conservative Union

Americans for Tax Reform

Concerned Women for America

Family Taxpayers Network

The Heartland Institute

The Howard Center

Illinois Eagle Forum

Illinois Family Institute

The Leadership Institute

Lincoln Legal Foundation

National Taxpayers Union

Taxpayers Network Inc.

United Republican Fund

Do you not see the inherent bias in their views?

heh...Berthoud has even criticized Warren Buffet:
http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_comment/comment-berthoud062003.asp

I'm disappointed, I expected better from you.

John Edwards hosted a campaign event at William Aiken House, named for a man who was once the South's largest slaveholder. Does that make him a racist?

CNN Story

BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!

That's so far from being a logical comparison it's not even in apples to oranges territory. More like apples to camel dung.
 

Riprorin

Banned
Apr 25, 2000
9,634
0
0
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Originally posted by: conjur
Berthoud spoke at the Chicago Conservative Conference 2002
Sponsored by these leading conservative organizations:

American Conservative Union

Americans for Tax Reform

Concerned Women for America

Family Taxpayers Network

The Heartland Institute

The Howard Center

Illinois Eagle Forum

Illinois Family Institute

The Leadership Institute

Lincoln Legal Foundation

National Taxpayers Union

Taxpayers Network Inc.

United Republican Fund

Do you not see the inherent bias in their views?

heh...Berthoud has even criticized Warren Buffet:
http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_comment/comment-berthoud062003.asp

I'm disappointed, I expected better from you.

John Edwards hosted a campaign event at William Aiken House, named for a man who was once the South's largest slaveholder. Does that make him a racist?

CNN Story

BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!

That's so far from being a logical comparison it's not even in apples to oranges territory. More like apples to camel dung.

Speaking at a conference sponsored by conservative oragnizations no more makes Bertoud a conservative than does Edwards' hosting of a campaign event at a slaveholders home make him a racist.

What's hard to understand?
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Yeah...like a Conservative Conference (meant for campaign issues) is going to invite a liberal?
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
It's indeed interesting to note what this same group (the CAGW) has to say about the current Republican-led Congress and the "never seen a spending bill I won't veto" President:

Cost of Government Day: Wasteful Spending Takes Its Toll

(Washington, D.C.) - Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW), in recognition of Cost of Government Day, today expressed outrage at the federal, state, and local governments? continued abuse of hundreds of billions of tax dollars in outdated, ineffective, duplicative, and wasteful programs and agencies. Cost of Government Day is the date on which the average American worker has earned enough to pay off his or her share of tax and regulatory burdens imposed by all levels of government, according to Americans for Tax Reform (ATR). CAGW recommends that governments at all levels move to aggressively cut taxes and waste and reduce regulations to diminish American families? tax burden.

?It does not require more than half the national income for the government to protect the life and liberty of every American,? CAGW President Tom Schatz said. ?A huge chunk of these tax dollars gets regurgitated in the form of wasteful programs.?

According to the report, Americans now work more than half of the year 189 days to pay their share of the cost of government. Americans worked one day less than last year, but this meaningless decline was after a 10-day jump from 2000 to 2003. To put the modern tax burden in historical perspective, the American Revolution was fought over British taxes that consumed 3 percent of colonial income. Serfs of the Middle Ages turned over about one-third of what they produced to their landlords.

?We surrender more than half of our working lives to the government,? Schatz continued. ?In exchange, we get $50 million for an indoor rainforest in Coralville, Iowa. Taxpayers should be outraged by the government?s ongoing waste of their hard-earned money.?

Earlier this year, CAGW identified 10,656 federal pork projects in its 2004 Congressional Pig Book, an increase of 13.8 percent from last year. The cost of these projects was $22.9 billion, or 1.6 percent more than last year?s total of $22.5 billion. The group also identified $1.3 trillion in savings over five years in its Prime Cuts report.

?As the cost of government turns more American lives into a financial struggle, the government invents new ways to increase its share,? Schatz continued. ?Cost of Government Day is today because members of Congress have chosen to spend tax dollars on projects such as the International Fund for Ireland and the National Wild Turkey Federation in South Carolina.?

?Cost of Government Day reminds taxpayers how much easier their lives would be without profligate government spending,? Schatz concluded. ?The vigilant uncovering of waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanagement exposes the lie that high taxes are necessary for essential government services.?

The complete report can be accessed on ATR's website: http://www.atr.org.

Citizens Against Government Waste is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to eliminating waste, fraud, mismanagement and abuse in government.

Wow, quite a bit of Republican pork there Rip! Put that in your crack pipe and smoke it!
 

T2T III

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
12,899
1
0
Originally posted by: conjur
Berthoud spoke at the Chicago Conservative Conference 2002
Sponsored by these leading conservative organizations:

American Conservative Union

Americans for Tax Reform

Concerned Women for America

Family Taxpayers Network

The Heartland Institute

The Howard Center

Illinois Eagle Forum

Illinois Family Institute

The Leadership Institute

Lincoln Legal Foundation

National Taxpayers Union

Taxpayers Network Inc.

United Republican Fund


--------------------------->>>>>> Do you not see the inherent bias in their views?

heh...Berthoud has even criticized Warren Buffet:
http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_comment/comment-berthoud062003.asp

That quote kills me. Pot calling the kettle black. ;)
 

Spencer278

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 2002
3,637
0
0
Originally posted by: Riprorin
This is another story that has received little if any coverage in the mainstream press.

The National Taxpayers Union (NTU) recently released its Congressional ratings for 1999. Unlike most groups which use only a few selected votes to rate legislators, the NTU counts every single vote that significantly affects taxes, spending, or debt.

Votes against spending and taxes are counted as plus votes. No one has ever scored 100 nor are they expected to?even the strongest conservatives vote to spend money for such items as national defense. Thus the NTU assigns each member a letter grade based on the numerical score. Those graded ?A? receive the ?Taxpayer?s Friend Award?. Those receiving an ?F? are placed in the ?Big Spender? category.

The average score of House members was 41%, and of Senators 45%. Republican scores averaged 60% in the House and 74% in the Senate; Democrats averaged only 21% in the House and 9% in the Senate.

Below are results for members who represent all or part of Iredell County:

GRADE SCORE

SENATE

Jesse Helms A 77%
John Edwards F 15%

HOUSE

Cass Ballenger B 59%
Sue Myrick A 69%
Mel Watt F 17%


If the republican score so much better in your BS numbers why is it they are spending like a pack of drunken sailors?

Oh and who really cares what the VP voted for in the senate the VP doesn't do anything unless the president is poppet like Bush.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Let me see if I have this straight. Republicans gain control of the Legislative and the Executive branches of govt, initiate some of the largest spending and debt increases in history. But somehow, the organizations Riprorin quotes seem to be able to pin this phenomenon on the Dems, particularly on a no-influence junior Senator... Dems who've basically been locked out of the budget formulation process by the Republican majority's steamroller tactics, particularly in the House...

And they perpetuate the lie that somehow taxcuts for wealthy americans benefit the majority, and that there is, in fact, a free lunch- that cuts in revenue and increases in spending have no negative effects, particularly when done in tandem...

Letting the current Republican leadership manage the Nation's finances will effectively destroy the fiscal integrity of the Govt., enslave future taxpayers to obscene interest payments on wealth transfers made to the financial elite via federal debt. We've allowed people who hate govt., who seek to destroy its effectiveness, actually run it, and that's a very bad mistake...
 

Riprorin

Banned
Apr 25, 2000
9,634
0
0
Surprise, surprise, Edwards voted against Bush's 2001 and 2003 tax cuts.

Again, Edwards is no friend of the taxpayer!
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Surprise, surprise, Edwards voted against Bush's 2001 and 2003 tax cuts.

Again, Edwards is no friend of the taxpayer!

As should have EVERY Senator.

Stalwart Republicans Alan Greenspan and Paul O'Neill were against the tax cuts and were in favor of funding Social Security to make it permantly solvent and to allow people age 38 and under to opt-out and instead invest in privatized retirement.

Those tax cuts led to the deficit spiraling upwards with NO trigger based on fiscal soundness (cuts would not have been rescinded should a fiscal deficit result.)
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech
Originally posted by: conjur
Berthoud spoke at the Chicago Conservative Conference 2002
Sponsored by these leading conservative organizations:

American Conservative Union

Americans for Tax Reform

Concerned Women for America

Family Taxpayers Network

The Heartland Institute

The Howard Center

Illinois Eagle Forum

Illinois Family Institute

The Leadership Institute

Lincoln Legal Foundation

National Taxpayers Union

Taxpayers Network Inc.

United Republican Fund


--------------------------->>>>>> Do you not see the inherent bias in their views?

heh...Berthoud has even criticized Warren Buffet:
http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_comment/comment-berthoud062003.asp

That quote kills me. Pot calling the kettle black. ;)

I don't understand why. Oh, if you mean because I'm a conservative Republican that is now criticizing the current administration?

I don't see how that's the pot calling the kettle black.'

I am FAR from being a neoconservative!
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
"Mr. Edwards paid $9,353,448 in federal taxes on his income of $26,869,496 (over a four-year span)"..From Conjur's thread.

Obviously unlike Cheney and the Dub, Edwards puts his money where his mouth is!
 

Riprorin

Banned
Apr 25, 2000
9,634
0
0
Edwards Denounces Accounting Tricks, But Used Them In 1990s

?Hard Work And Responsibility, Not Accounting Tricks And Corporate Greed.? ?I believe we can build a better life for our families, families like the family I grew up with, and communities like Seneca and Robbins, North Carolina. But it has to be based on the values of hard work and responsibility, not accounting tricks and corporate greed.? (Sen. John Edwards, Remarks At Democrat Presidential Candidates Debate, Columbia, SC, 5/3/03)

Edwards Sets Up Professional Corporation Where He Was Only Employee ? Avoids Medicare Taxes On $5 Million. ?Edwards, a trial lawyer, set up a professional corporation in 1995, in which he was the sole employee and shareholder. Edwards then paid himself a salary of $ 600,000 and $ 540,000 in 1996 and 1997, according to a personal disclosure statement he was required to file with the secretary of the Senate. At the same time he collected $5 million each year in dividends from his corporation. Edwards was required to pay Medicare taxes on his salary, but under this arrangement he was not required to pay Medicare taxes on his corporate dividends.? (Rob Christensen, ?Faircloth Claims Edwards Avoided Payroll Taxes,? The [Raleigh] News & Observer, 10/14/98)

?He?s Beating The System.? [E]xperts disagree on whether Edwards is courting an IRS audit. ?There is nothing that says you can?t do it,? says Andrew Blackman, a CPA and personal financial specialist with the New York City firm of Shapiro & Lobel. ?I think that it?s the type of situation, if light is focused on it, the IRS will see as abusive.? ?He?s beating the system by doing what he is doing,? said Blackman, who is chairman of the personal financial specialist subcommittee of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. ?Its not an uncommon thing to do. I?ve done it, but not in that sort of ratio (of salary to dividends).?? (Rob Christensen, ?Faircloth Claims Edwards Avoided Payroll Taxes,? The [Raleigh] News And Observer, 10/14/98)
 

SSibalNom

Golden Member
Aug 13, 2003
1,284
0
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
"Mr. Edwards paid $9,353,448 in federal taxes on his income of $26,869,496 (over a four-year span)"..From Conjur's thread.

Obviously unlike Cheney and the Dub, Edwards puts his money where his mouth is!

and its nice to know edwards is self-made not bitch-made, i dont support his politics but its nice to know someone running didnt have daddy/family give em the largest head start possible, he successfully ran a law firm to the top, thats a real accomplishment.

According to the Department of Health and Human Services, the federal government spends between $33.7 and $56.2 billion annually for malpractice coverage for programs such as Medicare, and the costs of defensive medicine. Passing reasonable limits on non-economic damages would reduce those costs to $28.1-$50.6 billion a year.

i hate all government spending, but hell if it only saves 2-6billion out of ~50.... i rather have all the people suing for malpractice not have to work ever again, especially if they were terminally damaged
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
bushies tax cuts while spending us into vast deficits shows animosity towards our children who will be the ones face this tax burden. bush hates children.