-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
John Edwards love child?
Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
nobodyknows
Diamond Member
It seems there were some comments/question about whether good ole Newt was cheating on a wife with cancer. I thought I would throw some light on the matter.
Don't like it? Sue me. 🙂
Pliablemoose
Lifer
We can just keep bumping this thread for months, nay years with new info...
"Edward's love child enters kindergarten."
"Edwards sentenced to 6 months for misappropriation of campaign funds..."
:laugh:
Lemon law
Lifer
Since this basically dead thread was revived only a few days ago, I see what I posted on 12/2007 is now often quoted. As far as I am concerned I was right then and right now, if an Edwards admission of paternity or DNA proof of Edward's paternity becomes later forthcoming, it simply lifts it from simply not credible rumor and innuendo to an undeniable truth we must all accept. Exactly the standard I proposed on 12/2007.
Until the facts are in, anyone can spread damaging rumors which are always unethical if billed as facts when they are at best mere possibilities or mere suspicions. And while the National Enquirer is the starter of many such rumors, they have a piss poor record because they are wrong far more times than they are correct.
And the other two things to mention, is that using public funds to pay hush money, is a separate crime not then charged.
But all we have now is un named sources saying Edwards will admit paternity and only those un named sources so we should still]
with hold final judgment.
Until the facts are in, anyone can spread damaging rumors which are always unethical if billed as facts when they are at best mere possibilities or mere suspicions. And while the National Enquirer is the starter of many such rumors, they have a piss poor record because they are wrong far more times than they are correct.
And the other two things to mention, is that using public funds to pay hush money, is a separate crime not then charged.
But all we have now is un named sources saying Edwards will admit paternity and only those un named sources so we should still]
with hold final judgment.
Lemon law
Lifer
I do not think Corn is being valid here, In the case of Edwards and Reilly, we had the fact of a baby, but no Edwards paternity established. And any evidence of Edwards and Reilly meeting to discuss the subject only occurred well after Reilly was already pregnant.
But in the Case of Bush and Cheney we had the facts of all kinds of un American torture abuses, and quite properly the paternity had to be directed at the top to Bush and Cheney. And before the torture occurred, the authorization from GWB and Rummy required revising various armed forces rules and training manuals with their signatures all over those revisions. We still not know even today, exactly how GWB&co screwed the pooch, but we 100% know it was GWB&co who screwed the pooch on torture and un American activities.
Quite different situations.
But in the Case of Bush and Cheney we had the facts of all kinds of un American torture abuses, and quite properly the paternity had to be directed at the top to Bush and Cheney. And before the torture occurred, the authorization from GWB and Rummy required revising various armed forces rules and training manuals with their signatures all over those revisions. We still not know even today, exactly how GWB&co screwed the pooch, but we 100% know it was GWB&co who screwed the pooch on torture and un American activities.
Quite different situations.
Lemon law
Lifer
Corn, surely you should not wave a red flags that will make you look even more stupid by saying, "Why limit the discussion to the alleged "torture" issue, why not include your prior comments on Plamegate or the US Attorney firings amongst many others? Oh, I think I might know the answer to that one. LOL you are pathetically dishonest."
No doubt about it, its you who is being pathetically dishonest. Face the facts, it takes special stupidity to be so unpatriotic to out a CIA agent for petty political revenge. Please don't try to get me started on all the GWB&co lies told to sell the Iraq war. Its been all covered before and if you think its anything but shameless, I will let you waste your words in trying to defend the indefensible.
Some how, in the grand scheme of things, there is something different in saying GWB lied and hundreds of thousand of people died and John Edwards lied and one innocent child was born.
No doubt about it, its you who is being pathetically dishonest. Face the facts, it takes special stupidity to be so unpatriotic to out a CIA agent for petty political revenge. Please don't try to get me started on all the GWB&co lies told to sell the Iraq war. Its been all covered before and if you think its anything but shameless, I will let you waste your words in trying to defend the indefensible.
Some how, in the grand scheme of things, there is something different in saying GWB lied and hundreds of thousand of people died and John Edwards lied and one innocent child was born.
UberNeuman
Lifer
John Edwards was an asshole for cheating on his sick wife and if he's found guilty of misusing his campaign funds, then I hope he gets his balls nailed to his forehead....
I'm glad to see so many of you feel the same way about Newt, Mark Sanford and John Ensign...
oh, wait... the rightwing sounds of silence....
/
such a hard week for rightwingers this week...
I'm glad to see so many of you feel the same way about Newt, Mark Sanford and John Ensign...
oh, wait... the rightwing sounds of silence....
/
Corn
Diamond Member
Ahem:
So tell me, which undeniable truth do you have which implicates Cheney or Bush to the "unpatriotic" outing of a CIA agent? You don't seem to be living up to "exactly that standard" to which you allegedly abide. Just admit you're a hypocrite, no one is perfect.
Yet another lie. You go ahead and provide a single example of me *defending* any allegedly illegal act committed by GWB. Any. Besides, if Bush's crimes are so clear cut as you say, it would seem to me that defending Bush isn't what's needed. Nope, it looks like the Obama administration which needs defending for it "unpatriotic" lack of action in prosecuting Bush.
Bump 🙂
Edwards Admits Fathering Love Child, Reportedly Separates From Wife
Douchebag of the millennium...
Edwards Admits Fathering Love Child, Reportedly Separates From Wife
Douchebag of the millennium...
Douchebag? Yes. Of the millennium? No.
Avvocato Effetti
Senior member
I always had a fundamental distrust of this man.
Who gets your vote? I can't wait to see who tops this list 🙂
- Running for president while fucking your "photographer"
- Knocking up your photographer
- Getting one of your cronies to claim the baby
- Doing all this while your wife battles cancer
- Lying about it for a year
- Going on 60 minutes, lying about 1/2 of it, but telling some of the truth
- Lying for another 6 months
- Finally admitting to it, then leaving your wife
And to top it off, he's an ambulance chasing prick who has caused more infant and mother mortality and raised healthcare costs with unnecessary c-sections than any one person in the US.
I'm going to go with someone who killed a lot of people. There are plenty. Take your pick of them.
Lemon law
Lifer
Well what do we have, one more politician with potential greatness, who lost it all because he could not keep his rocket in his pocket.
Alas poor Yorick, John Edwards joins a pile of other politicians on all sides of the partisan divide. As we discover he has the same feet of clay all too typical of everyone.
I therefore suggest that we require all politicians, be they male or female, to become sexually neutered before they can run for office. That will fix the problem.
Alas poor Yorick, John Edwards joins a pile of other politicians on all sides of the partisan divide. As we discover he has the same feet of clay all too typical of everyone.
I therefore suggest that we require all politicians, be they male or female, to become sexually neutered before they can run for office. That will fix the problem.
Turin39789
Lifer
hitler was a douchebag
Woah, wait, next you're going to tell me that Barry Bonds, Mark McGwire, Sammy Sosa, Jason Giambi, Rafael Palmiero, Roger Clemens, Alex Rodriguez, Manny Ramirez, and Andy Pettite all used PEDs. Shocking.
No, no, that's the other John Edward(s). Biggest douche in the universe. http://www.johnedward.net/JE_home.html
nobodyknows
Diamond Member
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 25K
-
-
-
