• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Jim Rogers Rips MSNBC a new one!!

Rofl. I love that guy, he totally tears into them all the time. He definitely says it like it is.

Before he responds (after the women respond), he gives a face like, "Wow, they have no idea what they are talking about." This video tickles me.
 
Great to see a dude talking about buying chinese shares. Seems like a smart dude.

🙂

Tho, it was pretty funny to see the clueless ask well, what about the poor bank loan holder should we just let them die? Well, of course we should but we didn't and now we have a huge debt to pay off oh well. Think of the kids! Think of the kids!!!

🙂

Meanwhile the dollar will tank some more.
 
bunch of horse$hit. Where does he get that 5 trillion dollar debt in 1 weekend thing. Is he saying that all the good mortgage Fannie/Freddie hold are gonna be worthless? He doesn't give a damn about American people and the economy. He just wanna see himself profit from his short position. You think he cares if average American can't find a mortgage after Fannie/Freddie fail?

It's pathetic that there are actually people who believe in people like him. He and people like him are the exact reason we are having all time high price in oil, food and other commodity. And some people believe his crap like gospel.
 
Originally posted by: rchiu
bunch of horse$hit. Where does he get that 5 trillion dollar debt in 1 weekend thing. Is he saying that all the good mortgage Fannie/Freddie hold are gonna be worthless? He doesn't give a damn about American people and the economy. He just wanna see himself profit from his short position. You think he cares if average American can't find a mortgage after Fannie/Freddie fail?

It's pathetic that there are actually people who believe in people like him. He and people like him are the exact reason we are having all time high price in oil, food and other commodity. And some people believe his crap like gospel.

Do you honestly believe that when the feds stepped in to bail out these idiots we are now better off the world is saved?

We are no better off we just put a small band aid on a huge bleeding hole and for what to delay the inevitable?

Oh well, I say it was a public traded stock let it die public traded. But, I guess you and I see it differently

Now for the crying and sobbing for the average Joe that can't pay the mortgage, I'm with ya brother, but you know what? The bail out didn't help them it helped the bank and it's owners. Do you really think by bailing out the bank that the debt owed to the bank is now magically repaid?

Guess Again! Weather the feds bailed out the bank or not the little guy would be in the same position and that is... YOUR SCREWED no matter what happens! PAY UP OR GET OUT!

And that's what it should be. Tho if we were to help anyone it really should be the people that need it most. There is no free ride, unless your rich, then they won't let you fail because you are in the big club.

Read between the lines and see what's really happening... Apparently you need to put your glasses back on.


 
Nobody has been able to explain to me how people would be better off if we had let everything crumble.

As rchiu said above, Rogers has his own motivations.

What's silly is that his investments in China can't be doing all that well. He's sucking wind there and will continue to do so. China is a big mess.
 
OK . Heres how it is . I have a neighbor. New him my whole life. He is a low life scum.

They always lived like pigs. ruin down house never cleaned.

His wifes mom built them a brand new house. Free and clear. 1 year latter the asswhole borrows $200,000 on a morg. He never made 1 payment to the bank . Managaged to somehow hide the money and was able to live in the new home 1 1/2 years longer without making any payments.

The funny part is this guys credit sucked bad . Yet the banks gave him $200,000 loan to a man who hasn't a job. Now He should go to jail and any other persons involved in the deal the contract should also go to jail.

How many of these bad loans were made to people with little or no income? We should be spending another billion or so on prisons to keep all these theives locked away were they belong. Befor for my life ends I would like to see an open season on all bankers. Like deer season but only one banker to a hunter.I shit you not. We have to rid society of these criminals.
 
Originally posted by: ericlp
Originally posted by: rchiu
bunch of horse$hit. Where does he get that 5 trillion dollar debt in 1 weekend thing. Is he saying that all the good mortgage Fannie/Freddie hold are gonna be worthless? He doesn't give a damn about American people and the economy. He just wanna see himself profit from his short position. You think he cares if average American can't find a mortgage after Fannie/Freddie fail?

It's pathetic that there are actually people who believe in people like him. He and people like him are the exact reason we are having all time high price in oil, food and other commodity. And some people believe his crap like gospel.

Do you honestly believe that when the feds stepped in to bail out these idiots we are now better off the world is saved?

We are no better off we just put a small band aid on a huge bleeding hole and for what to delay the inevitable?

Oh well, I say it was a public traded stock let it die public traded. But, I guess you and I
see it differently

Now for the crying and sobbing for the average Joe that can't pay the mortgage, I'm with ya brother, but you know what? The bail out didn't help them it helped the bank and it's owners. Do you really think by bailing out the bank that the debt owed to the bank is now magically repaid?

Guess Again! Weather the feds bailed out the bank or not the little guy would be in the same position and that is... YOUR SCREWED no matter what happens! PAY UP OR GET OUT!

And that's what it should be. Tho if we were to help anyone it really should be the people that need it most. There is no free ride, unless your rich, then they won't let you fail because you are in the big club.

Read between the lines and see what's really happening... Apparently you need to put your glasses back on.

It's you who need to put your glasses back on. Bailout help which owner of the bank? Bank stock holders are the owner and their stock will be worthless when the Fed takes owner.

And you need to understand how banks operates and how liquidity and customer confidence can affect a bank, even the most financially sound banks. Freddie/Fannie can have a financially sound balance sheet, but because the the recent liquidity problems, and the over hyped fear of their asset (mortgages), it is more costly for them to raise the money they need to do the business in the short term while all these is going on. It doesn't mean their long term business is not viable. What's wrong with the Fed to come out and guarantee their debt to easy some of the fear and provide some liquidity to help in the short term.

Yes it's not fair that the Fed doesn't help every business owner and private citizen that way. But that's because like banks, Freddie and Fannie offers some very important basic service to many people. And like the FDIC insurance, those action taken by Fed is done to ensure people who uses services from Feddie/Fannie isn't affected. Fed's action is not designed to help big shareholder's as their stock holding will still be pretty much worthless. But to help the large number of people that will be affected by the failure of Freddie/Fannie that buys and guarantees over 50% of all mortgage out there on the market.

So stop $hitting on the Fed for trying to do things to stabilize this economy, help lots of people, and listening to BS spew by traders who holds large short position in banks and hoping their inflammatory message would help their own profit.
 
Originally posted by: rchiu
bunch of horse$hit. Where does he get that 5 trillion dollar debt in 1 weekend thing. Is he saying that all the good mortgage Fannie/Freddie hold are gonna be worthless? He doesn't give a damn about American people and the economy. He just wanna see himself profit from his short position. You think he cares if average American can't find a mortgage after Fannie/Freddie fail?

It's pathetic that there are actually people who believe in people like him. He and people like him are the exact reason we are having all time high price in oil, food and other commodity. And some people believe his crap like gospel.

Right billions of house will sit empty because no one can find a mortgage? Someone owns ever single house in America and there need to get ride of it while not go away if Fannie/Freddie fail.
 
Originally posted by: rchiu
So stop $hitting on the Fed for trying to do things to stabilize this economy

That's not the Fed's job. The primary job is to stabilize the currency and they threw that under the bus long ago, or so it seems. Stabilize the currency and part of your problems go away, IMO.
 
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: rchiu
bunch of horse$hit. Where does he get that 5 trillion dollar debt in 1 weekend thing. Is he saying that all the good mortgage Fannie/Freddie hold are gonna be worthless? He doesn't give a damn about American people and the economy. He just wanna see himself profit from his short position. You think he cares if average American can't find a mortgage after Fannie/Freddie fail?

It's pathetic that there are actually people who believe in people like him. He and people like him are the exact reason we are having all time high price in oil, food and other commodity. And some people believe his crap like gospel.

Right billions of house will sit empty because no one can find a mortgage? Someone owns ever single house in America and there need to get ride of it while not go away if Fannie/Freddie fail.

Was this even english?
 
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
OK . Heres how it is . I have a neighbor. New him my whole life. He is a low life scum.

They always lived like pigs. ruin down house never cleaned.

His wifes mom built them a brand new house. Free and clear. 1 year latter the asswhole borrows $200,000 on a morg. He never made 1 payment to the bank . Managaged to somehow hide the money and was able to live in the new home 1 1/2 years longer without making any payments.

The funny part is this guys credit sucked bad . Yet the banks gave him $200,000 loan to a man who hasn't a job. Now He should go to jail and any other persons involved in the deal the contract should also go to jail.

How many of these bad loans were made to people with little or no income? We should be spending another billion or so on prisons to keep all these theives locked away were they belong. Befor for my life ends I would like to see an open season on all bankers. Like deer season but only one banker to a hunter.I shit you not. We have to rid society of these criminals.

I agree with you here.

What people don't understand is that borrowing behaviors by people did not change. People always borrowed 'as much as they could' or as much as a bank or institution told them they could borrow. What changed dramatically are lending practices by all these banks because they got smart and thought if their mortgages were mixed in with some good prime mortgages and insured with a AAA bond rating things would be great.

Well we all know how that turned out. The consumer got JACKED in this equation. They did what they were always asked to do... consume! I don't feel 1 bit of remorse for these banks.

What is sad though and what pisses me off more than anything, is that these banks' debts are SO HUGE and they have so little money, that the government HAS to bail them out now with my damn tax dollars paying off a scam perpetrated by these banks. And what do they lose? Nothing! Because Uncle Sam will give them what they want, because it will have to.

 
Originally posted by: GTKeeper
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
OK . Heres how it is . I have a neighbor. New him my whole life. He is a low life scum.

They always lived like pigs. ruin down house never cleaned.

His wifes mom built them a brand new house. Free and clear. 1 year latter the asswhole borrows $200,000 on a morg. He never made 1 payment to the bank . Managaged to somehow hide the money and was able to live in the new home 1 1/2 years longer without making any payments.

The funny part is this guys credit sucked bad . Yet the banks gave him $200,000 loan to a man who hasn't a job. Now He should go to jail and any other persons involved in the deal the contract should also go to jail.

How many of these bad loans were made to people with little or no income? We should be spending another billion or so on prisons to keep all these theives locked away were they belong. Befor for my life ends I would like to see an open season on all bankers. Like deer season but only one banker to a hunter.I shit you not. We have to rid society of these criminals.

I agree with you here.

What people don't understand is that borrowing behaviors by people did not change. People always borrowed 'as much as they could' or as much as a bank or institution told them they could borrow. What changed dramatically are lending practices by all these banks because they got smart and thought if their mortgages were mixed in with some good prime mortgages and insured with a AAA bond rating things would be great.

Well we all know how that turned out. The consumer got JACKED in this equation. They did what they were always asked to do... consume! I don't feel 1 bit of remorse for these banks.

What is sad though and what pisses me off more than anything, is that these banks' debts are SO HUGE and they have so little money, that the government HAS to bail them out now with my damn tax dollars paying off a scam perpetrated by these banks. And what do they lose? Nothing! Because Uncle Sam will give them what they want, because it will have to.

So, in other words. Consumers are idiots who cannot think, have no personal responsibility, and depend on non-capitalistic ideas and socialist government control to keep them in line and under control?

Ok. Great.
 
Who are these two idiots interviewing him? That chick's initial questions and attempt at making a logical argument was embarassing. Both of them basically had the argument of "well we should bail them out because".
 
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: GTKeeper
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
OK . Heres how it is . I have a neighbor. New him my whole life. He is a low life scum.

They always lived like pigs. ruin down house never cleaned.

His wifes mom built them a brand new house. Free and clear. 1 year latter the asswhole borrows $200,000 on a morg. He never made 1 payment to the bank . Managaged to somehow hide the money and was able to live in the new home 1 1/2 years longer without making any payments.

The funny part is this guys credit sucked bad . Yet the banks gave him $200,000 loan to a man who hasn't a job. Now He should go to jail and any other persons involved in the deal the contract should also go to jail.

How many of these bad loans were made to people with little or no income? We should be spending another billion or so on prisons to keep all these theives locked away were they belong. Befor for my life ends I would like to see an open season on all bankers. Like deer season but only one banker to a hunter.I shit you not. We have to rid society of these criminals.

I agree with you here.

What people don't understand is that borrowing behaviors by people did not change. People always borrowed 'as much as they could' or as much as a bank or institution told them they could borrow. What changed dramatically are lending practices by all these banks because they got smart and thought if their mortgages were mixed in with some good prime mortgages and insured with a AAA bond rating things would be great.

Well we all know how that turned out. The consumer got JACKED in this equation. They did what they were always asked to do... consume! I don't feel 1 bit of remorse for these banks.

What is sad though and what pisses me off more than anything, is that these banks' debts are SO HUGE and they have so little money, that the government HAS to bail them out now with my damn tax dollars paying off a scam perpetrated by these banks. And what do they lose? Nothing! Because Uncle Sam will give them what they want, because it will have to.

So, in other words. Consumers are idiots who cannot think, have no personal responsibility, and depend on non-capitalistic ideas and socialist government control to keep them in line and under control?

Ok. Great.

Sorry to break it to you but the average joe is just sheeple herded around by society. So in effect the answer is yes.

Think of it this way. What the banks did as you very well known is the equivalent of me having 1,000,000 dollars and giving 100,000 of it away at a time simply asking 'promise you will pay it back' without even knowing the person I lent the money to!

What are the odds that I get all my money back? And who is the true idiot in this case? Me or the people that I lent the money to that are irresponsible? I think its more my fault because I was dumb enough to lend the money in the first place, KNOWING it was probably a bad idea. Do you disagree with that?

 
Originally posted by: GTKeeper
Sorry to break it to you but the average joe is just sheeple herded around by society. So in effect the answer is yes.

Think of it this way. What the banks did as you very well known is the equivalent of me having 1,000,000 dollars and giving 100,000 of it away at a time simply asking 'promise you will pay it back' without even knowing the person I lent the money to!

What are the odds that I get all my money back? And who is the true idiot in this case? Me or the people that I lent the money to that are irresponsible? I think its more my fault because I was dumb enough to lend the money in the first place, KNOWING it was probably a bad idea. Do you disagree with that?

I think you're completely underestimating the intelligence and absolute ruthlessness and singlemindedness of some of these "investors" in this latest bubble.

Take for example a woman I went to college with. She was a friend of my wife's that I met while dating her. Always kind of a "hippie chick", never really cared about money. She graduated 1 credit shy of a masters from our school, it was a program offered by the university so that a new teacher could be 1 credit from getting a masters, but still be able to get hired as a new teacher.

she moved down to Naples FL, where my MIL lives, and got a job teaching for about 35k/yr. Eventually she bought a condo for $130k. She renovated it for 20k and made it pretty nice. Within 9 months the condo was appraised at $280k.

She had a baby in that time from a guy who was a revolving boyfriend. But in that time she decided to play the RE market game (2004). She hatched a plan to buy a $500K house, paying for it with the "equity" in her prior house, and then selling her reproductive eggs to make the monthly payments. I called her and advised that this was a bad idea, said she was putting her kid's future at risk. I went through the cashflows, showing that especially after flood/hurricane insurance she'd be underwater every month by $500. She ignored it and said I was jealous.

That eventually fell through, but she did buy a place for $350K in a place. She cashed out 140k in "equity" from her old place, using only 20k down for the new one, and paying off $80k in CC bills and 40k in refinishing costs of the other place. She lied about her income in both loans.

Fast-foward to today. She now has two kids with a different boyfriend. She has $600K in mortgages with houses worth approximately 320K. She quit her teaching job to run a daycare out of her home.

Not so ironically, she is now collecting welfare because she's a "single mom" of two. Her boyfriend of 3 years makes $60k as an electrician. However, since her business is all cash, they aren't married, and she refuses to allow her kid (from another dad) and his own kid to go on his insurance. Thus, she gets medicaid as well. Now she apparently got the banks to "help" her with her mortgages, reducing payments and altering terms.

She's now taking her "new money" (aka, the payment assistance she got from the banks) and spending it on stupid shit, such as $200 birthday cakes for her kid, and Abercrombie clothes for a 4 year old.


You see, people aren't brainless. They are very calculating and manipulative. They think the world owes them a quick buck and they'll do anything to get it. She's intelligent, but greedy, and should deserve everything she gets.


I agree that things should be much more cut and dry and banks should be allowed to fail. However, it isn't that easy in the real world.
 
they are young, pretty, diverse looking people who can read a teleprompter without saying 'u know' and 'like' too many times in one sentence...
 
Originally posted by: cubeless
they are young, pretty, diverse looking people who can read a teleprompter without saying 'u know' and 'like' too many times in one sentence...
And like, um, such as, uh, such as Africa and like education.

 
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: cubeless
they are young, pretty, diverse looking people who can read a teleprompter without saying 'u know' and 'like' too many times in one sentence...
And like, um, such as, uh, such as Africa and like education.


and u rn't even pretty and diverse...
 
I never really feel that I can trust a man wearing a bow tie. At least not since that damned Orville Reddenbacher sold me some horrible popcorn.

Regardless of that, Ross pwned this idiot who is simply trying to drive prices down even more by causing a panic in the market so that he profits more and more. I liked how he stammered when asked about whether a single bank would be solvent using his formula for deciding whether one is or is not.

I also noticed that when his answer was "So you think that we should continue to do things the same way" that none of the fanbois here jumped on him like you did the women interviewers for the exact same thing. He was also completely dumbstruck when he was told that his $5T in a single weekend was very disingenuous because the great majority of the loans are good loans.
 
I do have a problem with the bailout, but only in this sense.

If we are going to bail them out, then they need to become wholly government run entities instead of the quasi public/private institutions they are now. Basically we need a return to what the Freddie's were about 30 years ago.

My understanding of the arrangement is that the Freddie's skirted the rules by using creative financial instruments to issue loans that they were specifically prohibited from issuing by way of their charter.

Moving forward is continuing to allow all of the profits to be gobbled up by the private sector yet all the risk is assumed by us as the taxpayer.

This is absolutely wrong and when these people are playing with house money there is ZERO incentive for them to lend responsibly, because in the end we have to bail them out regardless.

You know something is wrong when Bernake has to come out and specifically say that the mortgage companies have the obligation to make sure the people they are lending to can actually repay the loan.

Really? What an amazing revelation.
 
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: GTKeeper
Sorry to break it to you but the average joe is just sheeple herded around by society. So in effect the answer is yes.

Think of it this way. What the banks did as you very well known is the equivalent of me having 1,000,000 dollars and giving 100,000 of it away at a time simply asking 'promise you will pay it back' without even knowing the person I lent the money to!

What are the odds that I get all my money back? And who is the true idiot in this case? Me or the people that I lent the money to that are irresponsible? I think its more my fault because I was dumb enough to lend the money in the first place, KNOWING it was probably a bad idea. Do you disagree with that?

I think you're completely underestimating the intelligence and absolute ruthlessness and singlemindedness of some of these "investors" in this latest bubble.

Take for example a woman I went to college with. She was a friend of my wife's that I met while dating her. Always kind of a "hippie chick", never really cared about money. She graduated 1 credit shy of a masters from our school, it was a program offered by the university so that a new teacher could be 1 credit from getting a masters, but still be able to get hired as a new teacher.

she moved down to Naples FL, where my MIL lives, and got a job teaching for about 35k/yr. Eventually she bought a condo for $130k. She renovated it for 20k and made it pretty nice. Within 9 months the condo was appraised at $280k.

She had a baby in that time from a guy who was a revolving boyfriend. But in that time she decided to play the RE market game (2004). She hatched a plan to buy a $500K house, paying for it with the "equity" in her prior house, and then selling her reproductive eggs to make the monthly payments. I called her and advised that this was a bad idea, said she was putting her kid's future at risk. I went through the cashflows, showing that especially after flood/hurricane insurance she'd be underwater every month by $500. She ignored it and said I was jealous.

That eventually fell through, but she did buy a place for $350K in a place. She cashed out 140k in "equity" from her old place, using only 20k down for the new one, and paying off $80k in CC bills and 40k in refinishing costs of the other place. She lied about her income in both loans.

Fast-foward to today. She now has two kids with a different boyfriend. She has $600K in mortgages with houses worth approximately 320K. She quit her teaching job to run a daycare out of her home.

Not so ironically, she is now collecting welfare because she's a "single mom" of two. Her boyfriend of 3 years makes $60k as an electrician. However, since her business is all cash, they aren't married, and she refuses to allow her kid (from another dad) and his own kid to go on his insurance. Thus, she gets medicaid as well. Now she apparently got the banks to "help" her with her mortgages, reducing payments and altering terms.

She's now taking her "new money" (aka, the payment assistance she got from the banks) and spending it on stupid shit, such as $200 birthday cakes for her kid, and Abercrombie clothes for a 4 year old.


You see, people aren't brainless. They are very calculating and manipulative. They think the world owes them a quick buck and they'll do anything to get it. She's intelligent, but greedy, and should deserve everything she gets.


I agree that things should be much more cut and dry and banks should be allowed to fail. However, it isn't that easy in the real world.


I agree with you there, but I don't know if this is 90% common place during the housing boom. Lying on applications is one thing, which you should go to jail for if you ask me. The bank failed here partially by not verifying the income and allowing her to take out so much equity AND purchase another property with it (red flag if you ask me), but at that point the banks probably thought prices were going to go up forever.

I think that most house scenarios looked like this.... a person walks into a bank and says 'how much of a loan can I get'. Bank says 'with your qualifications, 500k'. Now the questions are:

a) By how much did a person overestimate their ability to pay
b) By how much did a bank overestimate the person's ability to pay

If they both did, then you have what you have. 50/50 case in most scenarios. The problem is that the big banks got a bail out, people did not. Also it was the banks that instituted the more lax lending practices not the consumers. Insituting practices like 0% down etc. only lead to this failure. Not only that there were cases where people were encouraged to borrow more than what they felt comfortable with (which again 50/50 fault) so like you said lots of elements to the equation.

Its funny how banks changed their tune now. Now its 'hard' to get a mortgage, but I think the rules are finally correct. Mininum 10-20% down, good assessment etc.
 
Originally posted by: LegendKiller


So, in other words. Consumers are idiots who cannot think, have no personal responsibility, and depend on non-capitalistic ideas and socialist government control to keep them in line and under control?

Ok. Great.
Part of the problem is the lending industry is so complicated and the mortgage process and everything that goes into it is overly complicated. A person of average intelligence is not going to understand half the shit in that contract. And that's the way the lenders want it.

It's no longer the 1st Bank of Smalltown giving a loan so it's clients and residents of the town can get a home and prosper and in doing so the community as a whole (including the bank) prosper and grow.

Now it is about making as much $$$ as quick as possible and fuck the people whose heads you step on to do it.

 
Back
Top