• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Jesus's middle name is Hume! Caution: Some NSFW images within!

Page 1814 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
H0TZWT0.jpg

31wUu9m.jpg

WL2lCyv.jpg
 
Last edited:


I call shens on this...

If two bullets struck each other in flight it's likely that both would have been travelling somewhere near the same speed so one bullet going through another like that is ... unlikely. I suspect one bullet was set as a stationary target and the other shot into it.

Had two bullets hit each other in flight they would likely have been mangled beyond recognition.


Brian
 
I call shens on this...

If two bullets struck each other in flight it's likely that both would have been travelling somewhere near the same speed so one bullet going through another like that is ... unlikely. I suspect one bullet was set as a stationary target and the other shot into it.

Had two bullets hit each other in flight they would likely have been mangled beyond recognition.


Brian

No one cares.

Not Brian.
 
I call shens on this...

If two bullets struck each other in flight it's likely that both would have been travelling somewhere near the same speed so one bullet going through another like that is ... unlikely. I suspect one bullet was set as a stationary target and the other shot into it.

Had two bullets hit each other in flight they would likely have been mangled beyond recognition.


Brian


I'm missing the bit where anything was said about both bullets being in flight.
 
Back
Top