Jesus's middle name is Hume! Caution: Some NSFW images within!

[dave_the_nerd]

troll #764: accomplished

Suuuuuure...

 

[Ichinisan]

That's something any electronic WMS system would never allow and any audit would catch. It's down-right criminal to ignore both. Also, the specs are so well below their actual limits to avoid liability that it would have to be way beyond simply overloaded. It didn't take much room to get the speed necessary to take out that corner, so it looks like it wasn't even anchored to the floor. When it hits the rack on the right, it looks like the whole rack moves right as one piece, so they must not be. I wonder what backwards country without a OSHA equivalent allows that.

In short: Rack FAIL and not entirely lift driver FAIL. The nature of what they do means that they run into this stuff all the time and it's supposed to tolerate it safely.

Racks assembled incorrectly. That's what it looks like to me.

 

[Ichinisan]

No.

Apple remotes have to be paired with the machine. Hold it a couple inches in front of the receiver (center line, below the screen on an iMac... not sure where they are on a Macbook) and hold the center button down for X seconds. (X=10 iirc.)

Then they only work with that machine until paired with another.

Just another example of an Apple Basher without a clue.

You really want to have fun, telnet into an HP printer in the office, start a firmware update, then close the terminal connection. Instant paperweight where a printer used to be.

Fix by reapplying the firmware update.

All Apple remotes send each command as [[unique ID],[command]]. I only have experience with the Apple Universal Dock. If Apple computers are like Apple docks, they respond to any remote by default unless you deliberately configure it to respond to a specific remote.

 

[Ichinisan]

Would this really work?

troll #764: accomplished

Serious? :awe:

 

[Ichinisan]

Forklift fail details.

/rack debate

Settles nothing. Only describes what we see in the video. The rack should not have failed from that bump. They weren't assembled / anchored correctly or they weren't meant to hold that much weight.

...or there was some perfect resonance cascade.

 

[Ichinisan]

Is there a way to "play" .gifs only when clicked?

Seriously. The first browser to allow that on a site-by-site basis will be my new browser.

 

[pelov]

Bluetooth and bluetooth stuff with some bluetooths

 

[mcurphy]

One of these kids is not like the others, one of these kids is not quite the same..:whiste:

 

[Robert Munch]

 

[Dr. Zaus]

Yes, it did. Specifically that this happened in Russia so the racks aren't subjected to the same requirements as they would be in the US.

Uh huh... And since your link shows none of that and since you don't know that there are differing standards and since there are no arguments to be made regarding rack standards vis a vis torque-pressure, but only distributed load-pressure, my point that your link doesn't answer the questions stands.

 

[Howard]

Please don't say that's a man.

 

[Ruptga]

Please don't say that's a man.

Who cares?

 

[Dr. Zaus]

Who cares?

People who are not bisexual?

 

[Robert Munch]

Please don't say that's a man.

By the looks of the gym shoes i'm thinking female. Would be nice to see a reverse shot to be sure.

 

[Ruptga]

People who are not bisexual?

Or even people that realize it is just a picture?

 

[pelov]

 

[Newbian]

Please don't say that's a man.

Maybe you prefer this?

 

[eits]

By the looks of the gym shoes i'm thinking female. Would be nice to see a reverse shot to be sure.

never mind the fucking underwear...

 

[gevorg]

Maybe you prefer this?

<snip>

D:

 

[shortylickens]

Story of my life:

 

[Imp]

Maybe you prefer this?

...W...o...w.

 

[Ruptga]

Please don't say that's a man.

Judging by the file name, this is her.

You may now fap resume fapping with a clean conscience.

 

[Imp]

Judging by the file name, this is her.

You may now fap resume fapping with a clean conscience.

Sorry... but that lookie like a man.

 

[Ichinisan]

Who had the bright idea to use lossy JPG format instead of loss-less PNG? For shapes and colors, PNG should have a MUCH smaller file size and the image would be perfectly reproduced.

 

[DesiPower]