• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Jesus's middle name is Hume! Caution: Some NSFW images within!

Page 3704 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Last I looked: zero evidence in the historical record that jesus existed at all. Not a single shred of evidenc, just a well used theme present in earlier cultures.

If there has been some kind of discovery I am all ears.
Seems like your sources are in favor of something beyond the truth.

 
yClqznZ.jpeg
 
Oh dear, poor desperate Torn is imagining things again.
Your arrested development is your own little problem. I have even less patience of academic childishness than before mid-July.
Jesus the historical figure is a more mundane matter than Jesus the Christian God.
 
Last I looked: zero evidence in the historical record that jesus existed at all. Not a single shred of evidenc, just a well used theme present in earlier cultures.

If there has been some kind of discovery I am all ears. Mythologized history != history
There is evidence that he was based on a bunch of different characters and was basically an inside joke because educated people were the only ones who knew the original characters.
 
Seems like your sources are in favor of something beyond the truth.


Check who the writer of that article is. Obviously not an unbiased source. I hate that people get the title of Dr. without any actual science in their background.
 
Check who the writer of that article is. Obviously not an unbiased source. I hate that people get the title of Dr. without any actual science in their background.

Hey let's not indulge him, at least not here. His posts trying to be funny are bad enough, let's pass on having him vent over why he prefers the pink shades.

Making a quip/correction over something not funny or informative is one thing, inviting the religulous to debate is another. I'm sure you can tell by his link we're not missing anything. 😉

On a similar note...

 
Back
Top