Jesus's middle name is Hume! Caution: Some NSFW images within!

Page 126 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

MarkXIX

Platinum Member
Jan 3, 2010
2,642
1
71
stormtrooper_grave.jpg

That's been my wallpaper on my Android phone from the first day I found it.
 

Locut0s

Lifer
Nov 28, 2001
22,205
44
91
Wait what the. How did this pic work before the shop?! I mean she's not 'holding' anything:

properyl-hide-alcohol-facebook-pictures-10.jpg
 

Gigantopithecus

Diamond Member
Dec 14, 2004
7,664
0
71

You said there is no such thing as "big boned," because "everyone's bones are consistent in their thickness." Wolff's Law is just one example of how everyone's bone's are not relatively consistent in their thickness. I already said that skeletal variation doesn't account for morbid obesity, but there is clear variation in skeleton robusticity/thickness that has real-world implications. Go ahead and keep squirming about when someone calls you out for making retarded blanket statements because you think as a chiropractor you're an expert on bone biology.

You're not a scientist. You do not have an appreciation for patterns of normal variation, normal distributions, and you've seen fewer skeletons than my third year undergraduate students. Go read Tommasini et al. 2005 from the Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. Or are you next going to tell me that normal senescent resorption also has no implications for 'everyone's bones being consistently thick?'
 

Stuxnet

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2005
8,392
1
0
You guys are fucking up a great thread with some stupid chiro/bones pissing contest. No one gives a fuck. PM each other.
 

Aharami

Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
21,205
165
106
i agree. although respectable, no one gives a shit about how much you know about the human anatomy
 

eits

Lifer
Jun 4, 2005
25,015
3
81
www.integratedssr.com
You said there is no such thing as "big boned," because "everyone's bones are consistent in their thickness." Wolff's Law is just one example of how everyone's bone's are not relatively consistent in their thickness. I already said that skeletal variation doesn't account for morbid obesity, but there is clear variation in skeleton robusticity/thickness that has real-world implications. Go ahead and keep squirming about when someone calls you out for making retarded blanket statements because you think as a chiropractor you're an expert on bone biology.

You're not a scientist. You do not have an appreciation for patterns of normal variation, normal distributions, and you've seen fewer skeletons than my third year undergraduate students. Go read Tommasini et al. 2005 from the Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. Or are you next going to tell me that normal senescent resorption also has no implications for 'everyone's bones being consistently thick?'

lol you're an absolute idiot. quit trolling and ruining this thread, kthx.