Originally posted by: teclis1023
They hung nooses on school property, not their own. They did so in order to provoke black students after black students sat under the "white tree". This is akin to the KKK burning a cross. There should be penalization for this.
The black kids who beat the shit out of this guy also deserve to be punished for assault, but I highly doubt they were trying for murder. Maybe they were, I dunno. These black kids should ALSO be charged with a hate crime.
If I sat under a "christian tree" at school (if I were still in school) and the next day, some neo-nazi has put a swastika under it, I would expect school retaliation against them. I wouldn't try to fight them, however.
Originally posted by: ScoobMaster
Why must some people ALWAYS attempt classify others by race/culture/economic status ???? Why can't we look upon individuals as just that.... INDIVIDUAL people??
Let me try this: Read the following description with CLASSIFICATIONS removed:
6 people physically assaulted 1 person. They have been charged with a crime and are in jail.
3 people expressed themselves in a (subjectively) tasteless manner - poor taste, insensitivity and lack of tactfulness notwithstanding, no laws were broken
Now what is the problem here again???!!!
Originally posted by: dyna
Had the nooses had dolls of black people wrung around them I might agree they should be called out for a hate crime but just a noose? It was in bad taste what they did but it in no way is equal to giving somebody a life threatening beating to someone not even involved.
Originally posted by: teclis1023
Originally posted by: dyna
Had the nooses had dolls of black people wrung around them I might agree they should be called out for a hate crime but just a noose? It was in bad taste what they did but it in no way is equal to giving somebody a life threatening beating to someone not even involved.
Who said it was equal to a life threatening beating? I said they should be penalized, not charged with murder.
Also, I said that the black kids should be charged with a hate crime.
Originally posted by: Shivetya
why in the hell isn't 6 black kids beating up the white kid not a hate crime?
How did they did choose who to beat up?
Originally posted by: sirjonk
The nooses on the tree could be seen as an expression of free speech. Symbolic arguments are legal, even if backward and disgusting. For example, to take it out of the black v white arena, it would not, and should not, be illegal for a skinhead to build a model of a concentration camp and claim that Hitler was right to try to kill the Jews. If 6 Jews got together and then kicked the shit out of the guy for doing it, they should be charged with assault. We make a distinction in the law between symbolic expression and physical acts.
If the white kids threw the nooses over the tree and then held a meeting about how they could best go about hanging black kids, that's different. But just nooses over a tree? I don't even think that should be punishable (by the police; the school should probably suspend them). You want to hang a swastica on your front porch? Go ahead, this used to be a free country.
<<<<<-------(non-practicing) Jew
Yeah, a model of a concentration camp and a flag can't kill people, but the noose here was displayed as a symbol (of hate and bigotry, no argument there) and should be treated as such.
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Legally, you charge someone with attempted murder if they inflicted injury with the intent to cause serious bodily injury or death. They didn't have to want to kill him, just to want to seriously injur him, in a manner that could result in death. If they all punched him and then kicked him when he was on the ground, that would be enough for attempted murder.
Ex. You want to beat someone up with a hammer, but you only intend to break his shoulder. You swing at his shoulder, he dodges, and you hit him in the head and he ends up in the hospital. Even though you didn't mean to kill him, you can be charged with attempted murder.
Originally posted by: dyna
Originally posted by: teclis1023
They hung nooses on school property, not their own. They did so in order to provoke black students after black students sat under the "white tree". This is akin to the KKK burning a cross. There should be penalization for this.
The black kids who beat the shit out of this guy also deserve to be punished for assault, but I highly doubt they were trying for murder. Maybe they were, I dunno. These black kids should ALSO be charged with a hate crime.
If I sat under a "christian tree" at school (if I were still in school) and the next day, some neo-nazi has put a swastika under it, I would expect school retaliation against them. I wouldn't try to fight them, however.
Had the nooses had dolls of black people wrung around them I might agree they should be called out for a hate crime but just a noose? It was in bad taste what they did but it in no way is equal to giving somebody a life threatening beating to someone not even involved.
Originally posted by: Trell
Am I the only person that thinks that a crime is a crime, and labeling it as a "Hate Crime" is counter productive because it forces even more divisions on society?
Originally posted by: ahurtt
Originally posted by: ScoobMaster
Why must some people ALWAYS attempt classify others by race/culture/economic status ???? Why can't we look upon individuals as just that.... INDIVIDUAL people??
Let me try this: Read the following description with CLASSIFICATIONS removed:
6 people physically assaulted 1 person. They have been charged with a crime and are in jail.
3 people expressed themselves in a (subjectively) tasteless manner - poor taste, insensitivity and lack of tactfulness notwithstanding, no laws were broken
Now what is the problem here again???!!!
You are over simplifying this case. A lot more happened in between the nooses in the tree and the 6 on 1 beating. Go back to the first page of this thread and look at the links that outline the timeline of events that led up to the 6 on 1 beating. The black kids were not the first to resort to violence over the issue but they are being penalized much more heavily than the white kid who broke a beer bottle over a black kids head in an earlier turn of events. The white kid who was beat by the 6 black kids underwent 2 hours of hospital treatment and was released and even attended a school function later that evening. And they are charging the 6 who were involved with trying to "beat him to death?" It's not about that they should not suffer some punishment. It was wrong. Everybody involved in this whole thing is wrong about so many things on so many levels. . .black or white. But the argument here is that the law is that justice is being applied in a biased and uneven manner.
Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
That bus loads of protestors are descending upon Jena also illustrates the misdirected, race card agenda of the contemporary Civil Rights movement...these protestors, in claiming that these black kids are innocent, are in essence justifying violence as a suitable and reasonable response to racism...the same line of BS we heard to justify the LA riots after the Rodney King verdicts came out.
Originally posted by: Atomic Playboy
There are problems with the free speech angle here though. The act occured on school grounds. That nullifies free speech real fast, because it's private property. The students could easily be charged with vandalism or something similar, and probably should have been. I would've recommended the children be required to undergo some sort of educational "sensitivity training" type exercise that examines the history of lynching and the culture of racial violence in the South, something that may change their minds about deciding to use these symbols.
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: ahurtt
Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
That bus loads of protestors are descending upon Jena also illustrates the misdirected, race card agenda of the contemporary Civil Rights movement...these protestors, in claiming that these black kids are innocent, are in essence justifying violence as a suitable and reasonable response to racism...the same line of BS we heard to justify the LA riots after the Rodney King verdicts came out.
I don't think it's about them being innocent. It's about the sentences handed down to the black kids being much harsher and unfairly biased compared to what happened to the white kids. Again, read all the facts of the whole story.
You probably meant charges, not sentences handed down, as no sentences were handed down because there hasn't been a trial.
Originally posted by: ahurtt
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: ahurtt
Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
That bus loads of protestors are descending upon Jena also illustrates the misdirected, race card agenda of the contemporary Civil Rights movement...these protestors, in claiming that these black kids are innocent, are in essence justifying violence as a suitable and reasonable response to racism...the same line of BS we heard to justify the LA riots after the Rodney King verdicts came out.
I don't think it's about them being innocent. It's about the sentences handed down to the black kids being much harsher and unfairly biased compared to what happened to the white kids. Again, read all the facts of the whole story.
You probably meant charges, not sentences handed down, as no sentences were handed down because there hasn't been a trial.
Yes, true. . .charges not sentences. I misspoke.
Originally posted by: rpanic
But don?t the noses come down to just a message even if they were wrong and hateful? I don?t see how this excuses in any way 6 guys beating up and kicking a guy in the head till he passed out.
At my school there was a area that only seniors would hang out and if freshmen went over there they would throw them in the trash. I know its not exactly the same but I am sure if 6 freshmen went over and kicked a senior in the head tell he passed out they would be screwed.
Nothing justifies getting ganged up on and having you head kicked tell you are knocked out.