woolfe9998
Lifer
The fact they didn't have him under monitored care given his profile and previous suicide attempt is proof they weren't don't their jobs.
The question is if it's intentional negligence or gross incompetence.
Point of clarification, he had "marks" on his neck the week prior. This was reported by the media last week with emphasis on the likelihood that he had been attacked by another inmate. This in fact is what Epstein told his jailers. And it's plausible because this is how this kind of offender is often treated by the general prison population. So they didn't know for sure if there had been a prior attempt and we still do not know.
A suicide watch involves 24 hour a day eyes on from another human being. This cannot be sustained forever. Is one week sufficient when you're unsure if there really had been a prior attempt? I don't know. I assume there are written policies applicable to this situation. The prison staff would only be negligent for failing to follow the policy.