Java 5.0 is finally out (final version)

kamper

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2003
5,513
0
0
yikes, wth did 5.0 come from? I thought we were on 1.5.0 :confused: oh well, good to see that it's final. Now if eclipse would just support the syntax additions :|
 

dabuddha

Lifer
Apr 10, 2000
19,579
17
81
Originally posted by: kamper
yikes, wth did 5.0 come from? I thought we were on 1.5.0 :confused: oh well, good to see that it's final. Now if eclipse would just support the syntax additions :|

1.5 is 5.0 :) Those whacky guys have no clue how to version their products :D
 

kamper

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2003
5,513
0
0
Originally posted by: CarLBanks
5.0 has been out for a long time. The java.com site shows I have the latest version.

5.0 (1.5) has only been out in beta. Apparently it is now final.
 

dabuddha

Lifer
Apr 10, 2000
19,579
17
81
Originally posted by: kamper
Originally posted by: CarLBanks
5.0 has been out for a long time. The java.com site shows I have the latest version.

5.0 (1.5) has only been out in beta. Apparently it is now final.

Exactly :)

Now we just have to wait for an update to eclipse
 

Kntx

Platinum Member
Dec 11, 2000
2,270
0
71
One of the major themes targeted by the J2SE 1.5 release is ease of development. J2SE 1.5 provides new enhancements to further ease the development of Java applications and tools. New features such as generics, typesafe enumerated types, autoboxing, and enhanced for loop, are all new features that make using Java to build applications easier.

yes!! yes!! 'Bout damn time java!!
 

Argo

Lifer
Apr 8, 2000
10,045
0
0
Originally posted by: dabuddha
Originally posted by: kamper
Originally posted by: CarLBanks
5.0 has been out for a long time. The java.com site shows I have the latest version.

5.0 (1.5) has only been out in beta. Apparently it is now final.

Exactly :)

Now we just have to wait for an update to eclipse

Or WSAD :)
 

AFB

Lifer
Jan 10, 2004
10,718
3
0
Originally posted by: dabuddha
Originally posted by: kamper
Originally posted by: CarLBanks
5.0 has been out for a long time. The java.com site shows I have the latest version.

5.0 (1.5) has only been out in beta. Apparently it is now final.

Exactly :)

Now we just have to wait for an update to eclipse

Some people don't have to wait :)
 

XBoxLPU

Diamond Member
Aug 21, 2001
4,249
1
0
I ended up downloading the online installation file and installing over what I had

Worked fine
 

kamper

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2003
5,513
0
0
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Originally posted by: dabuddha
Originally posted by: kamper
Originally posted by: CarLBanks
5.0 has been out for a long time. The java.com site shows I have the latest version.

5.0 (1.5) has only been out in beta. Apparently it is now final.

Exactly :)

Now we just have to wait for an update to eclipse

Some people don't have to wait :)

What are you hinting at?
 

AFB

Lifer
Jan 10, 2004
10,718
3
0
Originally posted by: kamper
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Originally posted by: dabuddha
Originally posted by: kamper
Originally posted by: CarLBanks
5.0 has been out for a long time. The java.com site shows I have the latest version.

5.0 (1.5) has only been out in beta. Apparently it is now final.

Exactly :)

Now we just have to wait for an update to eclipse

Some people don't have to wait :)

What are you hinting at?

lol, Some people like IDEs other than eclipse. :shocked:
 

kamper

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2003
5,513
0
0
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Originally posted by: kamper
Originally posted by: amdfanboy

Some people don't have to wait :)

What are you hinting at?

lol, Some people like IDEs other than eclipse. :shocked:

I figured as much. Are you meaning JCreator? I'd give it a try now, if I wasn't doing school work that has to compile with 1.4.x.
 

kamper

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2003
5,513
0
0
Question for those who have installed the final 1.5 (I'm still running beta):
What version does java.exe report? Mine says 1.4.2_05 while javac.exe says 1.5.0_beta2. I figure it's just because the improvements are all at the compiler end and the run time hasn't changed. Just curious anyways...
 

AFB

Lifer
Jan 10, 2004
10,718
3
0
C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.5.0\bin>javac -version
javac 1.5.0
javac: no source files
Usage: javac <options> <source files>
where possible options include:
-g Generate all debugging info
-g:none Generate no debugging info
-g:{lines,vars,source} Generate only some debugging info
-nowarn Generate no warnings
-verbose Output messages about what the compiler is doing
-deprecation Output source locations where deprecated APIs are u
sed
-classpath <path> Specify where to find user class files
-cp <path> Specify where to find user class files
-sourcepath <path> Specify where to find input source files
-bootclasspath <path> Override location of bootstrap class files
-extdirs <dirs> Override location of installed extensions
-endorseddirs <dirs> Override location of endorsed standards path
-d <directory> Specify where to place generated class files
-encoding <encoding> Specify character encoding used by source files
-source <release> Provide source compatibility with specified release

-target <release> Generate class files for specific VM version
-version Version information
-help Print a synopsis of standard options
-X Print a synopsis of nonstandard options
-J<flag> Pass <flag> directly to the runtime system


C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.5.0\bin>java -version
java version "1.5.0"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0-b64)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0-b64, mixed mode, sharing)

http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/download.jsp
 

kamper

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2003
5,513
0
0
Alright afb, I went and tried JCreator. I didn't like how I couldn't just click and run a JUnit test case. Now I'll probably have to do some crap like finding the jar file and adding it to the classpath or something :roll: ;)

More problems: just for sh|ts and giggles I decided to run the default program it created for me. It was too dumb to realize that, since my project started with a number it would have to change the class name if it wanted to compile. But it didn't tell me this until I tried to compile it. Eclipse would have underlined the offending identifier and given me an error message as soon as I viewed the file.

So, I want to change this class name to try to run it. I right click the file in the File View and select rename. I rename it... Now only the file is renamed. Eclipse would have renamed the class and updated any references to it.

One major plus so far: it's using about 100Mb less ram then eclipse :D Oh, and it seems to have decent jsp syntax highlighting. That's a huge plus. I know there are plugins for Eclipse but I haven't gotten them to work with 3.0 yet.

Meh, I'll consider using it but probably won't.
 

AFB

Lifer
Jan 10, 2004
10,718
3
0
Originally posted by: SinNisTeR
i have beta, should i just install 1.5 over it? or unistall first?

You have to uninstall.

One major plus so far: it's using about 100Mb less ram then eclipse Oh, and it seems to have decent jsp syntax highlighting. That's a huge plus. I know there are plugins for Eclipse but I haven't gotten them to work with 3.0 yet.

That is the reason I use it. Yeah, it needs some work, but it has some neat stuff. It had Java 1.5 syntax highlighting since about late Spring. If I ever need a more advanced IDE, I guess I have to find something else, but this is nice and that I can actaully run other things in the background and have them run without bogging down my computer.