Jared Kushner Calls Kim Jong-un “Totally Unqualified Person"

NAC4EV

Golden Member
Feb 26, 2015
1,882
754
136
:D:D:D THIS SO DAM FUNNY

Jared Kushner Calls Kim Jong-un “Totally Unqualified Person” Who Got The Job Only Through Nepotism:eek::eek::eek:

Borowitz-JaredKushnerCallsKimJong-unTotallyUnqualified-690.jpg


:D:D:D:D
WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—Offering a stunningly blunt appraisal of the North Korean leader, Jared Kushner said on Tuesday that Kim Jong-un was a “totally unqualified person” who attained his position of power only through nepotism.


“Here you have a guy who has no government experience, and he’s in charge of the whole thing,” Kushner said, in an interview with Fox News. “It’s the craziest thing I’ve ever heard of.”


Kushner noted that, instead of working his way up and acquiring the skills necessary to do his job, the North Korean leader had been given huge responsibilities and power “only because of family connections.”


“There’s only one word for that,” he said. “Nepotism.”


Kushner called the notion of such an unqualified person conducting foreign policy “beyond belief.”


“I mean, why would you let someone with no experience in foreign affairs anywhere near such important decisions?” Kushner added. “Why would anyone take someone like that seriously?”


Kushner said that the people of North Korea must look at the powerful position attained by the “totally inexperienced and unqualified” Kim and shake their heads. “They’ve got to be asking themselves, ‘Who elected him?’ ” he said.
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,471
16,805
146
:D:D:D
Jared Kushner Calls Kim Jong-un “Totally Unqualified Person” Who Got The Job Only Through Nepotism :eek::eek::eek:

Borowitz-JaredKushnerCallsKimJong-unTotallyUnqualified-690.jpg


:D:D:D:D

WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—Offering a stunningly blunt appraisal of the North Korean leader, Jared Kushner said on Tuesday that Kim Jong-un was a “totally unqualified person” who attained his position of power only through nepotism.


“Here you have a guy who has no government experience, and he’s in charge of the whole thing,” Kushner said, in an interview with Fox News. “It’s the craziest thing I’ve ever heard of.”


Kushner noted that, instead of working his way up and acquiring the skills necessary to do his job, the North Korean leader had been given huge responsibilities and power “only because of family connections.”


“There’s only one word for that,” he said. “Nepotism.”


Kushner called the notion of such an unqualified person conducting foreign policy “beyond belief.”


“I mean, why would you let someone with no experience in foreign affairs anywhere near such important decisions?” Kushner added. “Why would anyone take someone like that seriously?”


Kushner said that the people of North Korea must look at the powerful position attained by the “totally inexperienced and unqualified” Kim and shake their heads. “They’ve got to be asking themselves, ‘Who elected him?’ ” he said.

Ctrl-shift-v.
 
Jan 25, 2011
17,123
9,619
146
And the award for most ironic foreign diplomacy statement is......... if only it were true.....


Oh. and in case anyone doesn't know Borowitz report is satire.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sheik Yerbouti

interchange

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,031
2,886
136
What do you think the best approach to diplomacy with someone with an incredible susceptibility to narcissistic injury and an array of devastating weapons who has recently faced humiliation in his attempts to demonstrate his metaphoric virility?

If you think the answer is piling on further humiliation, I encourage you to seek professional help.
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,471
16,805
146
What do you think the best approach to diplomacy with someone with an incredible susceptibility to narcissistic injury and an array of devastating weapons who has recently faced humiliation in his attempts to demonstrate his metaphoric virility?

If you think the answer is piling on further humiliation, I encourage you to seek professional help.

Appease him with shiny objects to his face, while surreptitiously eroding his power base and when possible, outright sabotage his operations under the guise of his underlings' incompetence. Exactly what we've done with NK for decades.
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
13,935
11,634
136
What do you think the best approach to diplomacy with someone with an incredible susceptibility to narcissistic injury and an array of devastating weapons who has recently faced humiliation in his attempts to demonstrate his metaphoric virility?

If you think the answer is piling on further humiliation, I encourage you to seek professional help.

Impeachment or Indictment.

Oh, wait. Were you talking about Kim?
 

interchange

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,031
2,886
136
Appease him with shiny objects to his face, while surreptitiously eroding his power base and when possible, outright sabotage his operations under the guise of his underlings' incompetence. Exactly what we've done with NK for decades.

Well, that strategy of containment certainly isn't directly aggravating, but I will point out that North Korea's sociopolitical climate aren't improving, and their arsenal is growing ever more powerful. I am uncertain, however, whether better could be expected.

But I find it useful perhaps to consider a case example:

You are the parent of an adorable but highly ego-centric 3 year-old boy. Let's name him Donny. Donny is sitting at the dinner table with you, chowing down on a gigantic bowl of spaghetti-o's. The adults are discussing something and he feels left out. So he raises a big spoonful of spaghetti-o's as if to sling it directly at your face. Luckily you notice and respond with a gentle "no-no Donny". But it doesn't work. Full-on toddler meltdown happens. Tears, snot-bubbles, the works. What do you do?
A. Point your finger at him and laugh at how small he is and can't even go through with throwing his spoonful of spaghetti-o's at you.
B. Tell him to "shut up already", smack him across the face, and keep on with your conversation.
C. Tell him "No Donny. Don't cry. You shouldn't feel upset. It's just spaghetti-o's."
D. Put him in immediate time-out for 10 minutes.
E. Grab a cookie and give it to him so he calms down and forgets about the spaghetti-o's, and while he's eating the cookie substitute the spaghetti-o's for a grilled-cheese sandwich so he can't make a giant mess.
F. Tell him "Donny, when you raised your spoon that made daddy feel really upset at you, and it's not good to make daddy upset, food is something that is yummy that we are supposed to eat and poop out, and throwing food is bad because it will make a mess and then you'll make me clean it up, and then we'll have to put you in a time-out after, and you don't want that do you?"
G. Tell him "I see you're upset. You can't throw your food. If you start to do so again, you will have a time-out until you're calm enough to join the family." When Donny raises his spoon again, take it from him but don't put it in time out because he didn't sling it at you and seems content to get a rise out of you.
H. Tell him "I see you're upset. You can't throw your food. If you start to do so again, you will have a time-out until you're calm enough to join the family." When Donny raises his spoon again, put him in time-out for 10 minutes even though he's calmed down to teach him a lesson not to do it again.
I. Tell him "I see you're upset. You can't throw your food. If you start to do so again, you will have a time-out until you're calm enough to join the family." When Donny raises his spoon again, put him in time-out and explain to him for 2 minutes why throwing his food is bad.
J. Tell him "I see you're upset. You can't throw your food. If you start to do so again, you will have a time-out until you're calm enough to join the family." When Donny raises his spoon again, put him in time-out until he is calm enough to join the family. After dinner is over, explain to him in toddler-appropriate language that he can't throw food and what you will do if he tries again in the future.

Personally, I think we should not confront his powerlessness nor should we artificially inflate his sense of power. We should communicate a reasonable limit and a reasonable action, and if the limit is crossed respond with that reasonable action which does not escalate the conflict. And when he is no longer at peak narcissistic vulnerability we should be as explicit as possible in negotiating clear boundaries and consequences and attempt to ally toward a goal of gradual de-escalation while being impressed at how strong of a leader he is to be humble enough to negotiate for peace.
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,471
16,805
146
Well, that strategy of containment certainly isn't directly aggravating, but I will point out that North Korea's sociopolitical climate aren't improving, and their arsenal is growing ever more powerful. I am uncertain, however, whether better could be expected.

But I find it useful perhaps to consider a case example:

You are the parent of an adorable but highly ego-centric 3 year-old boy. Let's name him Donny. Donny is sitting at the dinner table with you, chowing down on a gigantic bowl of spaghetti-o's. The adults are discussing something and he feels left out. So he raises a big spoonful of spaghetti-o's as if to sling it directly at your face. Luckily you notice and respond with a gentle "no-no Donny". But it doesn't work. Full-on toddler meltdown happens. Tears, snot-bubbles, the works. What do you do?
A. Point your finger at him and laugh at how small he is and can't even go through with throwing his spoonful of spaghetti-o's at you.
B. Tell him to "shut up already", smack him across the face, and keep on with your conversation.
C. Tell him "No Donny. Don't cry. You shouldn't feel upset. It's just spaghetti-o's."
D. Put him in immediate time-out for 10 minutes.
E. Grab a cookie and give it to him so he calms down and forgets about the spaghetti-o's, and while he's eating the cookie substitute the spaghetti-o's for a grilled-cheese sandwich so he can't make a giant mess.
F. Tell him "Donny, when you raised your spoon that made daddy feel really upset at you, and it's not good to make daddy upset, food is something that is yummy that we are supposed to eat and poop out, and throwing food is bad because it will make a mess and then you'll make me clean it up, and then we'll have to put you in a time-out after, and you don't want that do you?"
G. Tell him "I see you're upset. You can't throw your food. If you start to do so again, you will have a time-out until you're calm enough to join the family." When Donny raises his spoon again, take it from him but don't put it in time out because he didn't sling it at you and seems content to get a rise out of you.
H. Tell him "I see you're upset. You can't throw your food. If you start to do so again, you will have a time-out until you're calm enough to join the family." When Donny raises his spoon again, put him in time-out for 10 minutes even though he's calmed down to teach him a lesson not to do it again.
I. Tell him "I see you're upset. You can't throw your food. If you start to do so again, you will have a time-out until you're calm enough to join the family." When Donny raises his spoon again, put him in time-out and explain to him for 2 minutes why throwing his food is bad.
J. Tell him "I see you're upset. You can't throw your food. If you start to do so again, you will have a time-out until you're calm enough to join the family." When Donny raises his spoon again, put him in time-out until he is calm enough to join the family. After dinner is over, explain to him in toddler-appropriate language that he can't throw food and what you will do if he tries again in the future.

Personally, I think we should not confront his powerlessness nor should we artificially inflate his sense of power. We should communicate a reasonable limit and a reasonable action, and if the limit is crossed respond with that reasonable action which does not escalate the conflict. And when he is no longer at peak narcissistic vulnerability we should be as explicit as possible in negotiating clear boundaries and consequences and attempt to ally toward a goal of gradual de-escalation while being impressed at how strong of a leader he is to be humble enough to negotiate for peace.

Except this isn't a 3 year-old named Donny, it's a guy who, at a whim, is capable of leveling a first world capital. Whether he's willing or not is a gamble that not everyone is willing to make.

You're right on the part though that there may not be a better expectation of result from any given scenario option, I'm sure there's a half dozen risk managers in a think tank somewhere that's working through the possible solutions.
 

Sunburn74

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2009
5,076
2,635
136
LOL. Would be really funny if true but unfortunately is just comedic humor. Goes to show you though why nepotism is a bad thing and its painful to watch Trump rely on it so heavily.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
26,374
12,520
136
LOL. Would be really funny if true but unfortunately is just comedic humor. Goes to show you though why nepotism is a bad thing and its painful to watch Trump rely on it so heavily.
You'd be surprised how much nepotism there is in the intelligence community. I know, I escaped the pitch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

justoh

Diamond Member
Jun 11, 2013
3,686
81
91
What do you think the best approach to diplomacy with someone with an incredible susceptibility to narcissistic injury and an array of devastating weapons who has recently faced humiliation in his attempts to demonstrate his metaphoric virility?

If you think the answer is piling on further humiliation, I encourage you to seek professional help.

So a guy posts a funny piece of satire, clearly making fun of trump et al, not kim, and you thought it appropriate to go off on a tangent about diplomacy and kim's psychology?
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
What do you think the best approach to diplomacy with someone with an incredible susceptibility to narcissistic injury and an array of devastating weapons who has recently faced humiliation in his attempts to demonstrate his metaphoric virility?

If you think the answer is piling on further humiliation, I encourage you to seek professional help.

Donate bizarre memorabilia from the '60s like this guy.

BlueWhale-590x421.jpg


Kim has a museum of useless junk donated with awesome respect from world leaders paid in tribute. This would be a centerpiece in his display of dominance.
 

interchange

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,031
2,886
136
So a guy posts a funny piece of satire, clearly making fun of trump et al, not kim, and you thought it appropriate to go off on a tangent about diplomacy and kim's psychology?

It's as if you've never seen one of my posts before.

Although I think it less tangential in this case because I have no trouble believing Kim will see it, and I don't imagine he's the sort at all and especially now to appreciate a joke at his expense. Which you might say so what, that's his problem, and you'd be totally right except instead of a spoonful of spaghetti-o's he's got nuclear arms.

And more broadly I go on these tangents because a healthy psychologic understanding of human behavior makes us more likely to select leaders with the same, and the world is better off that way. Well, I hope it helps. Obviously we need anything that does.
 

justoh

Diamond Member
Jun 11, 2013
3,686
81
91
It's as if you've never seen one of my posts before.

Although I think it less tangential in this case because I have no trouble believing Kim will see it, and I don't imagine he's the sort at all and especially now to appreciate a joke at his expense. Which you might say so what, that's his problem, and you'd be totally right except instead of a spoonful of spaghetti-o's he's got nuclear arms..


It's not at his expense. The piece is funny because the charges don't make sense when applied to Kim at all. What could make a god family unqualified to run their little 1984 experiment? Sighcologists....
 

interchange

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,031
2,886
136
It's not at his expense. The piece is funny because the charges don't make sense when applied to Kim at all. What could make a god family unqualified to run their little 1984 experiment? Sighcologists....

Your post makes no logical sense to me whatsoever.