Japan postpones Iraq deployment
Japan has said it will postpone sending troops to join the US-led coalition in Iraq until next year because of the worsening security situation.
Originally posted by: chazzheatherly
Back in 1941, they were gonna take over the world. In 2003,
they can't even take over a street corner -
Gutless, useless, worthless - almost as bad as the French.
At least Tojo does not smell!
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: chazzheatherly
Back in 1941, they were gonna take over the world. In 2003,
they can't even take over a street corner -
Gutless, useless, worthless - almost as bad as the French.
At least Tojo does not smell!
You made the bed, now lie in it. Why should they come in when Iraq is almost as dangerous now as during War.
New battles in Tikrit, Air strikes restarted, etc. Is THAT a place where safety can be provided for the rebuilding of the country? Where law and order duties can be passed to other nations?
I don't blame ANY country for not sending troops right now, not until the current security issues are at least on the mend.
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: chazzheatherly
Back in 1941, they were gonna take over the world. In 2003,
they can't even take over a street corner -
Gutless, useless, worthless - almost as bad as the French.
At least Tojo does not smell!
You made the bed, now lie in it. Why should they come in when Iraq is almost as dangerous now as during War.
New battles in Tikrit, Air strikes restarted, etc. Is THAT a place where safety can be provided for the rebuilding of the country? Where law and order duties can be passed to other nations?
I don't blame ANY country for not sending troops right now, not until the current security issues are at least on the mend.
There are cities in the US that are more dangerous the Iraq is right now.
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: chazzheatherly
Back in 1941, they were gonna take over the world. In 2003,
they can't even take over a street corner -
Gutless, useless, worthless - almost as bad as the French.
At least Tojo does not smell!
You made the bed, now lie in it. Why should they come in when Iraq is almost as dangerous now as during War.
New battles in Tikrit, Air strikes restarted, etc. Is THAT a place where safety can be provided for the rebuilding of the country? Where law and order duties can be passed to other nations?
I don't blame ANY country for not sending troops right now, not until the current security issues are at least on the mend.
There are cities in the US that are more dangerous the Iraq is right now.
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: chazzheatherly
Back in 1941, they were gonna take over the world. In 2003,
they can't even take over a street corner -
Gutless, useless, worthless - almost as bad as the French.
At least Tojo does not smell!
You made the bed, now lie in it. Why should they come in when Iraq is almost as dangerous now as during War.
New battles in Tikrit, Air strikes restarted, etc. Is THAT a place where safety can be provided for the rebuilding of the country? Where law and order duties can be passed to other nations?
I don't blame ANY country for not sending troops right now, not until the current security issues are at least on the mend.
Sorry that is gutless. You think the U.S. and it's soldiers should be the only ones to rid the world of ruthless Dictators? Where in the Constitution does it say we are the Worlds Cop?
Every country that believes in Democracy should be helping out otherwise they are just the wusses that they were and always will be.
The Security Issues is everyone's business not just the U.S. Our Men and Women will get the job done though without your help obviously.
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: chazzheatherly
Back in 1941, they were gonna take over the world. In 2003,
they can't even take over a street corner -
Gutless, useless, worthless - almost as bad as the French.
At least Tojo does not smell!
You made the bed, now lie in it. Why should they come in when Iraq is almost as dangerous now as during War.
New battles in Tikrit, Air strikes restarted, etc. Is THAT a place where safety can be provided for the rebuilding of the country? Where law and order duties can be passed to other nations?
I don't blame ANY country for not sending troops right now, not until the current security issues are at least on the mend.
Sorry that is gutless. You think the U.S. and it's soldiers should be the only ones to rid the world of ruthless Dictators? Where in the Constitution does it say we are the Worlds Cop?
Every country that believes in Democracy should be helping out otherwise they are just the wusses that they were and always will be.
The Security Issues is everyone's business not just the U.S. Our Men and Women will get the job done though without your help obviously.
Originally posted by: bigdog1218
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: chazzheatherly
Back in 1941, they were gonna take over the world. In 2003,
they can't even take over a street corner -
Gutless, useless, worthless - almost as bad as the French.
At least Tojo does not smell!
You made the bed, now lie in it. Why should they come in when Iraq is almost as dangerous now as during War.
New battles in Tikrit, Air strikes restarted, etc. Is THAT a place where safety can be provided for the rebuilding of the country? Where law and order duties can be passed to other nations?
I don't blame ANY country for not sending troops right now, not until the current security issues are at least on the mend.
Sorry that is gutless. You think the U.S. and it's soldiers should be the only ones to rid the world of ruthless Dictators? Where in the Constitution does it say we are the Worlds Cop?
Every country that believes in Democracy should be helping out otherwise they are just the wusses that they were and always will be.
The Security Issues is everyone's business not just the U.S. Our Men and Women will get the job done though without your help obviously.
American troops are only there because taking control of Iraq benifits America, it has nothing to do with making the world a better place. If we were all about Democracy why don't we start with Cuba? Or how about some other dictators like in North Korea?
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: chazzheatherly
Back in 1941, they were gonna take over the world. In 2003,
they can't even take over a street corner -
Gutless, useless, worthless - almost as bad as the French.
At least Tojo does not smell!
You made the bed, now lie in it. Why should they come in when Iraq is almost as dangerous now as during War.
New battles in Tikrit, Air strikes restarted, etc. Is THAT a place where safety can be provided for the rebuilding of the country? Where law and order duties can be passed to other nations?
I don't blame ANY country for not sending troops right now, not until the current security issues are at least on the mend.
Sorry that is gutless. You think the U.S. and it's soldiers should be the only ones to rid the world of ruthless Dictators? Where in the Constitution does it say we are the Worlds Cop?
Every country that believes in Democracy should be helping out otherwise they are just the wusses that they were and always will be.
The Security Issues is everyone's business not just the U.S. Our Men and Women will get the job done though without your help obviously.
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: bigdog1218
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: chazzheatherly
Back in 1941, they were gonna take over the world. In 2003,
they can't even take over a street corner -
Gutless, useless, worthless - almost as bad as the French.
At least Tojo does not smell!
You made the bed, now lie in it. Why should they come in when Iraq is almost as dangerous now as during War.
New battles in Tikrit, Air strikes restarted, etc. Is THAT a place where safety can be provided for the rebuilding of the country? Where law and order duties can be passed to other nations?
I don't blame ANY country for not sending troops right now, not until the current security issues are at least on the mend.
Sorry that is gutless. You think the U.S. and it's soldiers should be the only ones to rid the world of ruthless Dictators? Where in the Constitution does it say we are the Worlds Cop?
Every country that believes in Democracy should be helping out otherwise they are just the wusses that they were and always will be.
The Security Issues is everyone's business not just the U.S. Our Men and Women will get the job done though without your help obviously.
American troops are only there because taking control of Iraq benifits America, it has nothing to do with making the world a better place. If we were all about Democracy why don't we start with Cuba? Or how about some other dictators like in North Korea?
They aren't supporting terrorists and don't have unaccounted-for materials for the manufacturing of WMD, genius.
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: chazzheatherly
Back in 1941, they were gonna take over the world. In 2003,
they can't even take over a street corner -
Gutless, useless, worthless - almost as bad as the French.
At least Tojo does not smell!
You made the bed, now lie in it. Why should they come in when Iraq is almost as dangerous now as during War.
New battles in Tikrit, Air strikes restarted, etc. Is THAT a place where safety can be provided for the rebuilding of the country? Where law and order duties can be passed to other nations?
I don't blame ANY country for not sending troops right now, not until the current security issues are at least on the mend.
Sorry that is gutless. You think the U.S. and it's soldiers should be the only ones to rid the world of ruthless Dictators? Where in the Constitution does it say we are the Worlds Cop?
Every country that believes in Democracy should be helping out otherwise they are just the wusses that they were and always will be.
The Security Issues is everyone's business not just the U.S. Our Men and Women will get the job done though without your help obviously.
Originally posted by: Gaard
<<
KEEP MILLENNIUM BANNED FOR GOOD THIS TIME!!>>
Banned again?
6 months into this conflict and the Materials are still unaccounted for and the theory that Iraq had ties with Al Qaeda has been debunked (well ties before the war) So I guess that we go to war with ruthless Dictators based on Faulty Intel.Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: bigdog1218
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: chazzheatherly
Back in 1941, they were gonna take over the world. In 2003,
they can't even take over a street corner -
Gutless, useless, worthless - almost as bad as the French.
At least Tojo does not smell!
You made the bed, now lie in it. Why should they come in when Iraq is almost as dangerous now as during War.
New battles in Tikrit, Air strikes restarted, etc. Is THAT a place where safety can be provided for the rebuilding of the country? Where law and order duties can be passed to other nations?
I don't blame ANY country for not sending troops right now, not until the current security issues are at least on the mend.
Sorry that is gutless. You think the U.S. and it's soldiers should be the only ones to rid the world of ruthless Dictators? Where in the Constitution does it say we are the Worlds Cop?
Every country that believes in Democracy should be helping out otherwise they are just the wusses that they were and always will be.
The Security Issues is everyone's business not just the U.S. Our Men and Women will get the job done though without your help obviously.
American troops are only there because taking control of Iraq benifits America, it has nothing to do with making the world a better place. If we were all about Democracy why don't we start with Cuba? Or how about some other dictators like in North Korea?
They aren't supporting terrorists and don't have unaccounted-for materials for the manufacturing of WMD, genius.
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
They aren't supporting terrorists and don't have unaccounted-for materials for the manufacturing of WMD, genius.Originally posted by: bigdog1218 If we were all about Democracy why don't we start with Cuba? Or how about some other dictators like in North Korea?
Originally posted by: chazzheatherly
Back in 1941, they were gonna take over the world. In 2003,
they can't even take over a street corner -
Gutless, useless, worthless - almost as bad as the French.
At least Tojo does not smell!
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
What's the point of being in the coalition if you're not going to lend any assistance?
Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: bigdog1218
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: chazzheatherly
Back in 1941, they were gonna take over the world. In 2003,
they can't even take over a street corner -
Gutless, useless, worthless - almost as bad as the French.
At least Tojo does not smell!
You made the bed, now lie in it. Why should they come in when Iraq is almost as dangerous now as during War.
New battles in Tikrit, Air strikes restarted, etc. Is THAT a place where safety can be provided for the rebuilding of the country? Where law and order duties can be passed to other nations?
I don't blame ANY country for not sending troops right now, not until the current security issues are at least on the mend.
Sorry that is gutless. You think the U.S. and it's soldiers should be the only ones to rid the world of ruthless Dictators? Where in the Constitution does it say we are the Worlds Cop?
Every country that believes in Democracy should be helping out otherwise they are just the wusses that they were and always will be.
The Security Issues is everyone's business not just the U.S. Our Men and Women will get the job done though without your help obviously.
American troops are only there because taking control of Iraq benifits America, it has nothing to do with making the world a better place. If we were all about Democracy why don't we start with Cuba? Or how about some other dictators like in North Korea?
They aren't supporting terrorists and don't have unaccounted-for materials for the manufacturing of WMD, genius.
So unless the dictator supports terrorists or has unaccounted-for-WMD-materials, we don't give two hoots for the citizens. I see. It's really not about democracy.
Easy, to have removed him by force might have resulted in a Nuclear conflict between us and the Soviets. At the very least it would have provoked them into invading West Berlin.Originally posted by: dmcowen674
But why did we leave Castro in power, he pointed WMD right in our face from 90 miles out and yet he is still there...
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: bigdog1218
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: chazzheatherly
Back in 1941, they were gonna take over the world. In 2003,
they can't even take over a street corner -
Gutless, useless, worthless - almost as bad as the French.
At least Tojo does not smell!
You made the bed, now lie in it. Why should they come in when Iraq is almost as dangerous now as during War.
New battles in Tikrit, Air strikes restarted, etc. Is THAT a place where safety can be provided for the rebuilding of the country? Where law and order duties can be passed to other nations?
I don't blame ANY country for not sending troops right now, not until the current security issues are at least on the mend.
Sorry that is gutless. You think the U.S. and it's soldiers should be the only ones to rid the world of ruthless Dictators? Where in the Constitution does it say we are the Worlds Cop?
Every country that believes in Democracy should be helping out otherwise they are just the wusses that they were and always will be.
The Security Issues is everyone's business not just the U.S. Our Men and Women will get the job done though without your help obviously.
American troops are only there because taking control of Iraq benifits America, it has nothing to do with making the world a better place. If we were all about Democracy why don't we start with Cuba? Or how about some other dictators like in North Korea?
They aren't supporting terrorists and don't have unaccounted-for materials for the manufacturing of WMD, genius.
So unless the dictator supports terrorists or has unaccounted-for-WMD-materials, we don't give two hoots for the citizens. I see. It's really not about democracy.
This has always been my question if you look at my posts looong before this whoe Iraq mess.
It has always seemed to me that we let and keep Dictators in power. There is some truth to the "We have to pick our Battles" kind of thing like someone mentioned above Countries harboring Terrorists, making WMD etc.
But why did we leave Castro in power, he pointed WMD right in our face from 90 miles out and yet he is still there...