Jalopnik drives the 2010 Chevrolet Equinox

MikeMike

Lifer
Feb 6, 2000
45,885
66
91
Conventional wisdom would have us believe American car companies can't compete with Japanese rivals on quality and economy for popular models like compact SUVs. The 2010 Chevy Equinox seeks to prove GM can.

For years it was enough to just have an entry in the compact SUV segment. It didn't matter how boring or poorly packaged it was. Most were just that and sold fine anyways. Now, with the current annual automotive market sales rate sitting just under 10 million cars a year and this segment eating up a solid 10 percent of that, there's no room to be just "okay." The competition is cutthroat in this bread-and-butter class, so in order to be anything but an also ran, you have to be outstanding.


The 2010 Equinox approaches this ruthless market with a giant banner tied to it shouting about its fuel economy. It beats out the main competition from Honda, Ford, and Toyota in all trim levels in both city and highway figures. The 188 HP, 2.4-liter direct injection four-cylinder in front wheel drive form claims a 22/32 MPG city/highway fuel economy figure, with the bigger, and mildly more satisfy 264 HP 3.0-liter V6 clocking in at 18/25 MPG. In comparison, the four-cylinder 2009 Toyota RAV4 returns just 21 MPG city/27 highway while making nine less HP.

Both engines get a six speed automatic transmission, optional all-wheel drive and are available with every trim level except the low-end LS, which is available with the four-cylinder only. For those looking for even more economy ? and despite sensationalist reporting by our peers ? we were given a strong "negatory" on the possibility of a hybrid in the near future and no possibility of dropping the platform-mate Saturn Vue's dual mode hybrid powertrain into the engine bay.


For the vast majority of buyers, the DI 2.4-liter with FWD will be totally adequate. It's responsive without protest, returns a workable 8.7-second 0-to-60 MPH time and, yes Virgina, it does get 32 MPG. With the "Eco" button pressed, the torque converter locks up sooner and shift points move down the revs, but it doesn't suck the life out of throttle response as on the Prius and Insight. As a trade off, it also only gives up an extra 1 MPG. With "ECO" lit up on our gauge cluster and under highway conditions, the on-board mileage computer spat out a respectable 32.1 MPG, certainly not scientific, but it means the figure is at least plausible. Everyday mixed use saw an average of about 28.2 MPG, even accounting for our leaden foot. The thirstier V6 with all-wheel-drive returned 21.8 under mixed use and the four-cylinder with all-wheel drive managed 23 MPG.

We're kind of wondering why GM even bothered with the Eco-mode button. Unless you're really leaning on the car, you'll never notice a difference with it on, and the one mile per gallon difference seems silly for the trouble of a button that'll probably always be in "on" mode.

Mileage stuff is boring though. The drive is what's important to us and here the Theta-platformed Equinox delivers like its Japanese competitors don't. Despite the Michelin low rolling resistance tires, road feel is actually not too bad, body control is excellent for the segment, pushing the vehicle further into the territory of car-like feel than its predecessor. Understeer comes on a bit abruptly, but let's be honest here, this rig ain't going to see an autocross course any time soon. Shifting isn't exactly a drama-filled experience, but it's not hunting for gears and getting in the way. As with most recent GM autoboxes, you can manually control it with a shifter-mounted rocker switch. If you're in a sporting (but not too sporting, this is a compact SUV) mood, running up to the 7,000 RPM rev limiter is pretty fun and far more exciting than mashing the gas and waiting for a downshift. Steering is electronically boosted, but not overly light.

That the powertrain is wrapped in an all-new body seems to be secondary to the competent performance, but we'd be remiss in failing to mention the looks. Along with the maximum fuel economy slathered across giant flashing billboards and proclaimed from the heavens in skywriting, GM will be touting the style. Inside and out the Equinox gets thoroughly updated everything, borrowing liberally from the precedent-setting Malibu which was a breath of fresh air in Chevy's previously stinky automotive stable. It's got a clean, modern look, which is simultaneously inoffensive and handsome.

Which brings us to the interior, a traditional GM weak point. Make that a really weak point. While the Equinox delivers in spades when it comes to interior style ? and at all trim levels we might add ? it still, in our mind, falls a bit short of where we wish it would be. We have to keep price point in mind when we're talking about this segment, and while we'd have loved soft-touch plastics, you get solidly constructed rubberized plastic ? like all the competition. There's plenty of storage and it passes the knock test (Jalopnik patent pending) on everything but the gauge hood, which isn't something often interacted with. Ergonomically, everything works fairly well, though the driver's reach for some radio adjustments and the far corners of the touch screen nav system are excessively long. The centralized switch panel works nicely and consolidates everything for easy control.

Where the interior excels is with the seats. Here's the weird thing, the cloth option is way better than the leather. It's a sporty, airy neoprene-like material that's grippy and comfortable. Stretched over dual density foam, we sat in complete comfort for hours of driving. The back seats have the benefit of fore and aft adjustments to make way for legs or cargo, whichever is most pressing, and the seat backs recline to a comfortable angle, should you get bored of watching the optional flip-up DVD players.

What's missing from the cabin is noise. Acoustics engineers bent over backwards to make this thing insanely quiet, it's got acoustic glass surrounding the front passengers, spray-in-place sound deadening, triple door seals and active noise cancellation through the standard subwoofer; the end result is a remarkably quiet cabin. Not just for the segment, for the market. It's not quite at Lexus levels, but us even mentioning that in the same company of a mere Chevy says something.

The bottom line comes down to the bottom line. The Equinox in base LS trim with the 2.4-Liter and front-wheel drive starts at $23,185, a full $1,825 cheaper than the last model. A fully loaded LTZ with all the bells and whistles should top the charts at around $35k, but nobody will buy that car, because it's totally unnecessary. Buying the cheap model doesn't mean you have to suffer el-cheapo plastics, harsh NVH and hideous seats. With the Equinox, GM figures it's providing more interior room, more standard equipment, higher fuel economy and better design at competitive pricing. After this first look, we're inclined to agree. You'd have to put a gun to our heads to get us to buy an entry-level compact SUV, but if we had no choice, we'd go for the new Equinox.

http://jalopnik.com/5284939/20...et-equinox-first-drive

Thanks Rick and Bob, you guys brought out the best in GM engineering and design and then got forced out.
 

MBrown

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2001
5,726
35
91
:thumbsup: Its too bad people will be boycotting GM. *runs and hides*
 
Jun 18, 2000
11,191
765
126
The Equinox seems like a great cute ute. Could be a real class leader.

Hopefully some day GM will get a car review without all the backhanded complements. "Everybody knows domestic interiors are crap, but not this one!" "Not normally their strong point, gas mileage is competitiive with Japanese rivals." Etc, etc. I mean overall the review was extremely positive. Kudos to GM. It looks like they are finally winning over the media. Hopefully in generation or two they'll be comparing imports to GM and Fords in this same way.

Hell the review starts out with:

"Conventional wisdom would have us believe American car companies can't compete with Japanese rivals on quality and economy for popular models like compact SUVs. The 2010 Chevy Equinox seeks to prove GM can."
 

Bignate603

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
13,897
1
0
Originally posted by: LOUISSSSS
http://jalopnik.com/photogallery/2010equint1/1008683751
omg imagine all the dirty/rock/feathers/threads/random crap that will get stuck on those meshy looking seats

Here's the weird thing, the cloth option is way better than the leather. It's a sporty, airy neoprene-like material that's grippy and comfortable. Stretched over dual density foam, we sat in complete comfort for hours of driving.

They sound fine to me.
 

LOUISSSSS

Diamond Member
Dec 5, 2005
8,770
54
91
theres a difference between driving a car once for a review (which is brand new of course), and driving one for years which accumulates crap.

sure, they may be comfortable (subjective, lets leave it out) but mesh pockets will def keep the dirt and small pebbles on better.
 

MikeMike

Lifer
Feb 6, 2000
45,885
66
91
Originally posted by: LOUISSSSS
theres a difference between driving a car once for a review (which is brand new of course), and driving one for years which accumulates crap.

sure, they may be comfortable (subjective, lets leave it out) but mesh pockets will def keep the dirt and small pebbles on better.

dude, you are so biased, you cant even compliment a domestic car, you are a troll to the Nth degree, someone who runs to the teacher to rat out the kid like a little tattle tale. you see the world through douchebag colored glasses.
 

Bignate603

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
13,897
1
0
Originally posted by: LOUISSSSS
theres a difference between driving a car once for a review (which is brand new of course), and driving one for years which accumulates crap.

sure, they may be comfortable (subjective, lets leave it out) but mesh pockets will def keep the dirt and small pebbles on better.

Most people aren't walking around with large clumps of dirt and pebbles on their butt.

Honestly if the absolute worst you can think of is "Oh noooooos, the seat will collect small pieces of string or pebbles that are sticking to my hind quarters" it's a pretty decent vehicle.

BTW, this SUV with an auto gets better than a 4 cylinder Accord with a manual.

Equinox Auto- 22/32 mpg
Accord manual - 22/31 mpg
Accord Auto - 21/30 mpg
 

LOUISSSSS

Diamond Member
Dec 5, 2005
8,770
54
91
actually you guys are baiting me. i stated my opinion on something as "not important" about the car as the seat covers: it shouldn't get all your panties wet like i always do. actually i like it, which is why i'm here. you guys cry so much that 1 person hates your american pos cars. i love it

i never said it was an absolute worst car etcetc. YOU'RE THE NUB thats saying it. but i guess now that you mention it, i'd rather get the best selling cr-v, even if it may be a little smaller. what u gunna say now mr america? that the cr-v sucks? LOL all the americans r buying it! and if not the cr-v then the rav4!

 

zoiks

Lifer
Jan 13, 2000
11,787
3
81
Originally posted by: LOUISSSSS
actually you guys are baiting me. i stated my opinion on something as "not important" about the car as the seat covers: it shouldn't get all your panties wet like i always do. actually i like it, which is why i'm here. you guys cry so much that 1 person hates your american pos cars. i love it

i never said it was an absolute worst car etcetc. YOU'RE THE NUB thats saying it. but i guess now that you mention it, i'd rather get the best selling cr-v, even if it may be a little smaller. what u gunna say now mr america? that the cr-v sucks? LOL all the americans r buying it! and if not the cr-v then the rav4!

I wouldn't get a boring piece of shit Honda for anything. Same goes for a excruciatingly boring Toyota.
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
32,878
12,149
136
Originally posted by: LOUISSSSS
actually you guys are baiting me. i stated my opinion on something as "not important" about the car as the seat covers: it shouldn't get all your panties wet like i always do. actually i like it, which is why i'm here. you guys cry so much that 1 person hates your american pos cars. i love it

i never said it was an absolute worst car etcetc. YOU'RE THE NUB thats saying it. but i guess now that you mention it, i'd rather get the best selling cr-v, even if it may be a little smaller. what u gunna say now mr america? that the cr-v sucks? LOL all the americans r buying it! and if not the cr-v then the rav4!

quoting for admitting to being a troll... just in case
 

Falloutboy

Diamond Member
Jan 2, 2003
5,916
0
76
yah saw this car at the carshow this year, and knew it was a winner at first site.

al you GM haters have to admit GM has things figured out lately

Malibu is equal or better than anything toyota and honda have
Traverse and other Lamda SUVs are solid and very well built
Equinox is a SUV that gets the milage of a good midsized car and as this review shows very well made
Cruze looks to be more of the same, and hopefully will be a good replacement for the shit cobalt.
 

LOUISSSSS

Diamond Member
Dec 5, 2005
8,770
54
91
Originally posted by: zoiks

I wouldn't get a boring piece of shit Honda for anything. Same goes for a excruciatingly boring Toyota.

I wouldn't get a boring piece of shit GM for anything. Same goes for a excruciatingly boring (insert domestic car here.)
 

TehMac

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2006
9,976
3
71
Originally posted by: KnightBreed
The Equinox seems like a great cute ute. Could be a real class leader.

Hopefully some day GM will get a car review without all the backhanded complements. "Everybody knows domestic interiors are crap, but not this one!" "Not normally their strong point, gas mileage is competitiive with Japanese rivals." Etc, etc. I mean overall the review was extremely positive. Kudos to GM. It looks like they are finally winning over the media. Hopefully in generation or two they'll be comparing imports to GM and Fords in this same way.

Hell the review starts out with:

"Conventional wisdom would have us believe American car companies can't compete with Japanese rivals on quality and economy for popular models like compact SUVs. The 2010 Chevy Equinox seeks to prove GM can."

It serves them right for being a bunch of pussies and caving into labor legislation and demands in the late 70's, 80's, and 90's.
 

Bignate603

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
13,897
1
0
Originally posted by: LOUISSSSS
i never said it was an absolute worst car etcetc. YOU'RE THE NUB thats saying it.

I never did either, let's take a look at what I said.

Honestly if the absolute worst you can think of is "Oh noooooos, the seat will collect small pieces of string or pebbles that are sticking to my hind quarters" it's a pretty decent vehicle.

I never said it was the worst car. I said that your worst insult was the seats were bad. If you didn't have anything more than that to complain about the car must be pretty good.

what u gunna say now mr america? that the cr-v sucks? LOL all the americans r buying it! and if not the cr-v then the rav4!

Yes, and you're comparing them to a vehicle that doesn't isn't available for sale yet. Also just an FYI but, last month the Ford escape outsold the CR-V and Rav4 here in the US.
 

PricklyPete

Lifer
Sep 17, 2002
14,582
162
106
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
Thanks Rick and Bob, you guys brought out the best in GM engineering and design and then got forced out.

It really does sadden me that they put so much good effort into overhauling the GM line...were only 1/4 of the way through and got pushed out. Between productions like the CTS, G8, Camaro, Lambda platform, Malibu...and the upcoming Equinox, SRX, Cruze, Volt...they really had some quality products coming down the line.

I'm also excited about this DI 4 cylinder being used in other vehicles...seems like a great engine.
 

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
Originally posted by: LOUISSSSS
Originally posted by: zoiks

I wouldn't get a boring piece of shit Honda for anything. Same goes for a excruciatingly boring Toyota.

I wouldn't get a boring piece of shit GM for anything. Same goes for a excruciatingly boring (insert domestic car here.)

Really? Don't you own a excruciatingly boring car already (Accord)?
 

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
To get back on-topic, the Equinox is a great SUV. A good friend of mine just bought one, and it is very nice. Neither he, nor I, have problems with feathers or rocks stuck to our clothing, so the seat should be just fine.

The CR-V and RAV4 are nice too, but this comperable and is priced to sell.

Again, sales don't equate to good. Was the Ford Taurus the best car in the late 80's or early 90's? No, but it sold well. That argument is getting REALLY old.

Edit: SP