birthdaymonkey

Golden Member
Oct 4, 2010
1,176
3
81
Rumours indicate that these should be available now. Are they just in notebooks, or can we expect desktop chips as well?
 

dma0991

Platinum Member
Mar 17, 2011
2,723
1
0
What if they made an I3 3120K

I would flip out, that thing would be awesome.
If they did, I'll gladly buy 3. First to be put through suicidal overclock, second in case the first died, third...because its cheap. ;)
 

birthdaymonkey

Golden Member
Oct 4, 2010
1,176
3
81
I'm interested in an i3 3225 (with HD4000) for my HTPC. My G620 can't quite manage madVR (although it comes close).
 

lehtv

Elite Member
Dec 8, 2010
11,897
74
91
What if they made an I3 3120K

I would flip out, that thing would be awesome.

It'll never happen... i5 sales would plummet.

Pentium G620K or an IB equivalent thereof would be awesome though :awe:
 

Puppies04

Diamond Member
Apr 25, 2011
5,909
17
76
If they did, I'll gladly buy 3. First to be put through suicidal overclock, second in case the first died, third...because its cheap. ;)

What do you mean "because it's cheap"? If they even made them they would cost at least what a base I5 did and then you would be back to complaining again wouldn't you...
 

IntelEnthusiast

Intel Representative
Feb 10, 2011
582
2
0
Rumours indicate that these should be available now. Are they just in notebooks, or can we expect desktop chips as well?

There will be 3rd generation Intel® Core™ i3 released for the desktop market but both of them (desktop and laptop Intel Core i3's) are not being released for some time to come.
 

ShintaiDK

Lifer
Apr 22, 2012
20,378
146
106
Well the Taiwan Intel rep only said "after june 24th". As impatient as we are, we quickly translated it into launch at june 24th.
 

ShintaiDK

Lifer
Apr 22, 2012
20,378
146
106
And the E6500K. That was cheap tho.

Remember why we got locked CPUs. Its due to counterfeits.
 

pantsaregood

Senior member
Feb 13, 2011
993
37
91
It'll never happen... i5 sales would plummet.

Pentium G620K or an IB equivalent thereof would be awesome though :awe:

I doubt i5 sales would plummet. An i3 at ~5 GHz isn't going to rival a quad-core at 4.5 GHz. It would cost around $20-30 more than the top i3 model, which would place it only moderately lower than the current low i5 model. Only enthusiasts would buy it.
 

borisvodofsky

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2010
3,606
0
0
I doubt i5 sales would plummet. An i3 at ~5 GHz isn't going to rival a quad-core at 4.5 GHz. It would cost around $20-30 more than the top i3 model, which would place it only moderately lower than the current low i5 model. Only enthusiasts would buy it.

Are you kidding me? an i3 at 5ghz for $100 less, NO ONE would buy i5s
 

dma0991

Platinum Member
Mar 17, 2011
2,723
1
0
What do you mean "because it's cheap"? If they even made them they would cost at least what a base I5 did and then you would be back to complaining again wouldn't you...
It isn't about the number of cores, it will be slightly more expensive but I doubt it will ever come near an i5 K model. An i3 K model would be the cheapest alternative for those who wants to get a kick out of overclocking, easily replaceable as well.
 

Denithor

Diamond Member
Apr 11, 2004
6,298
23
81
Yes they would. The I3 540 was unlocked and hit 5Ghz and people still bought 920's and 760's

Um, no. i3 540 certainly was not unlocked.

Remember fsb/bclk overclocking? Yeah, that had nothing to do with an unlocked multiplier...

The difference today is that we cannot overclock the fsb/bclk anymore since they set everything (SATA, PCIe, etc) to run off that frequency - and those portions cannot be locked to a set value like we could do back in the 'good old days.'

It's only going to get worse going forward, with Haswell Intel will also be integrating the VRM on die - meaning we won't be overvolting anymore unless they decide to unlock that setting in the BIOS for us on the 'K' chips.
 

Don Karnage

Platinum Member
Oct 11, 2011
2,865
0
0
Um, no. i3 540 certainly was not unlocked.

Remember fsb/bclk overclocking? Yeah, that had nothing to do with an unlocked multiplier...

The difference today is that we cannot overclock the fsb/bclk anymore since they set everything (SATA, PCIe, etc) to run off that frequency - and those portions cannot be locked to a set value like we could do back in the 'good old days.'

It's only going to get worse going forward, with Haswell Intel will also be integrating the VRM on die - meaning we won't be overvolting anymore unless they decide to unlock that setting in the BIOS for us on the 'K' chips.

You are correct but the 540 could do 4.9Ghz+ with a good motherboard. I've seen it done as well as 5Ghz+ with a 550.

Not quite 5Ghz but you get the point

i3_540_oc.jpg