ITunes quality question

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Finally went looking around, and found some things I like. I would not be using an Ipod device, but burning a CD for my home theater, and sometimes putting them on my PDA.

How is the sound quality?
 

Goosemaster

Lifer
Apr 10, 2001
48,775
3
81
it is decent, as long as the material isn't too demanding. Classical might stick out like a sore thumb if it is demanding (see:carmen) but for simple beats such as techno, r&B, hiphop, and pop, it should be fine....

Then again I got Blur's "song 2" it the 128kbps is noticable....

EDIT:

In general, what suffers the most is "soundstage"
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
it is decent, as long as the material isn't too demanding. Classical might stick out like a sore thumb if it is demanding (see:carmen) but for simple beats such as techno, r&B, hiphop, and pop, it should be fine....

Then again I got Blur's "song 2" it the 128kbps is noticable....

EDIT:

In general, what suffers the most is "soundstage"

Is there a higher quality alternative to ITunes then?
 
Mar 11, 2004
23,444
5,851
146
I think the highest I've seen (for legal services) is 192, which is good, but VBR would be better. Too bad you can't download songs in the Apple lossless format (essentially the AAC).

 

loup garou

Lifer
Feb 17, 2000
35,132
1
81
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
it is decent, as long as the material isn't too demanding. Classical might stick out like a sore thumb if it is demanding (see:carmen) but for simple beats such as techno, r&B, hiphop, and pop, it should be fine....

Then again I got Blur's "song 2" it the 128kbps is noticable....

EDIT:

In general, what suffers the most is "soundstage"

Is there a higher quality alternative to ITunes then?
AllOfMP3, but it's a gray area, legal-wise.
 

GoodRevrnd

Diamond Member
Dec 27, 2001
6,801
581
126
Week later bumpage....

So iTunes music is ONLY available in 128? What a rip off... looking for at least 192 or AAC. Is that AllOfMP3 thing safe, payment-wise?
 

elbosco

Senior member
Jul 17, 2004
907
0
71
Originally posted by: GoodRevrnd
Week later bumpage....

So iTunes music is ONLY available in 128? What a rip off... looking for at least 192 or AAC. Is that AllOfMP3 thing safe, payment-wise?

Music off iTunes is AAC...
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
So iTunes music is ONLY available in 128? What a rip off... looking for at least 192 or AAC. Is that AllOfMP3 thing safe, payment-wise?

....its not mp3. itunes uses the aac? or was that acc compression.. its a newer audio compression tech by the mpeg group. its more advanced so it is probably about comparable to 192kbs mp3 at 128kbs.
 

zakee00

Golden Member
Dec 23, 2004
1,949
0
0
the quality is generally pretty damn good, there are only a few songs that i've downloaded that I wish were better. Apple Lossless would be pretty dumb simply because 1 song is about 25MB. High quality VBR MP3/AAC's are what I would like to see. I used to hate MP3s, but then i discovered EAC and LAME. WOW!!
Nick
 

Gurck

Banned
Mar 16, 2004
12,963
1
0
Originally posted by: zakee00
the quality is generally pretty damn good, there are only a few songs that i've downloaded that I wish were better. Apple Lossless would be pretty dumb simply because 1 song is about 25MB. High quality VBR MP3/AAC's are what I would like to see. I used to hate MP3s, but then i discovered EAC and LAME. WOW!!
Nick

ogg > mp3/aac... I'd also suggest lossless (though a more widely supported standard like flac - nobody uses apple lossless) - if you're paying full price, why not get the full data? If you want to compress it for a portable device or to your own varying preferences depending on genre / your interest, there's also nothing stopping you.
 

Goosemaster

Lifer
Apr 10, 2001
48,775
3
81
Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: zakee00
the quality is generally pretty damn good, there are only a few songs that i've downloaded that I wish were better. Apple Lossless would be pretty dumb simply because 1 song is about 25MB. High quality VBR MP3/AAC's are what I would like to see. I used to hate MP3s, but then i discovered EAC and LAME. WOW!!
Nick

though a more widely supported standard like flac - nobody uses apple lossless)

You always have to put stuff like that in:p

 

Koing

Elite Member <br> Super Moderator<br> Health and F
Oct 11, 2000
16,843
2
0
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: zakee00
the quality is generally pretty damn good, there are only a few songs that i've downloaded that I wish were better. Apple Lossless would be pretty dumb simply because 1 song is about 25MB. High quality VBR MP3/AAC's are what I would like to see. I used to hate MP3s, but then i discovered EAC and LAME. WOW!!
Nick

though a more widely supported standard like flac - nobody uses apple lossless)

You always have to put stuff like that in:p

LOL so true :p

Koing
 
Jun 14, 2003
10,442
0
0
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
it is decent, as long as the material isn't too demanding. Classical might stick out like a sore thumb if it is demanding (see:carmen) but for simple beats such as techno, r&B, hiphop, and pop, it should be fine....

Then again I got Blur's "song 2" it the 128kbps is noticable....

EDIT:

In general, what suffers the most is "soundstage"

Is there a higher quality alternative to ITunes then?


yeah encode it yourself im afraid.
 

flxnimprtmscl

Diamond Member
Jan 30, 2003
7,962
2
0
Originally posted by: werk
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
it is decent, as long as the material isn't too demanding. Classical might stick out like a sore thumb if it is demanding (see:carmen) but for simple beats such as techno, r&B, hiphop, and pop, it should be fine....

Then again I got Blur's "song 2" it the 128kbps is noticable....

EDIT:

In general, what suffers the most is "soundstage"

Is there a higher quality alternative to ITunes then?
AllOfMP3, but it's a gray area, legal-wise.

I <3 allofmp3.com. It gets my vote.
 

Gurck

Banned
Mar 16, 2004
12,963
1
0
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: zakee00
the quality is generally pretty damn good, there are only a few songs that i've downloaded that I wish were better. Apple Lossless would be pretty dumb simply because 1 song is about 25MB. High quality VBR MP3/AAC's are what I would like to see. I used to hate MP3s, but then i discovered EAC and LAME. WOW!!
Nick

though a more widely supported standard like flac - nobody uses apple lossless)

You always have to put stuff like that in:p

Sorry, it's just true... How many portable or pc software players natively support the two formats? In the case of apple lossless, only one of each...